CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
You can share this debate in three different ways:
#1
#2
#3
Paste this URL into an email or IM:
Click here to send this debate via your default email application.
Click here to login and CreateDebate will send an email for you.
Should we illegalise gay marrige
VOTE PLEASE! IF YOU HATE GAYS AND WANT TO KEEP SUPPORTING THE INSTITUTION THAT OPPRESSES THEM AND HELP MAINTAIN THE LIE OF HOMOSEXUALITY, CHOOSE NO AND KEEP GAY MARRIGE. READ MY OLDER ARGUMENTS...WAIT, I'll copy paste them here some time later. Anyway, DON'T HATE GAYS! HATE HOMOSEXUALITY!
I agree with your agreement but I also disagree because making them get madatory divorces involves the usage of the word divorce which suggests that at one time in the past they were "married".
Since homosexuals aren't real (Or rather, homosexuality is a lie) gay marrige is a lie too. That's why we shouldn't acknowledge gay couples since they can't get married in the first place. They should both get psycological counseling (Seperately)
I know that gay marrige is legal. Please read the title more clearly again. It say "ILLEGALISE" gay marrige. You see, the gays aren't actually gay. It's a lie they use to hide their actual psycological trauma. That's why making gay marrige illegal again will actually help the gays because it will lead them to confront what is actually hurting them.
Basically, I am trying to get everybody to say "HELL NO!" to gay marrige.
That is because that sadly, before everybody misunderstood gays. Instead of trying to give them psycological help for the trauma they sufferend at an invariable point in their lives, the people and media called them objectionable names like "fag" "faggot" and "bugger" and so forth.
Then when they were thrown into hospitals they were shown pornorgraphy instead of being offered real psycological help to get the the actual roots of their trauma.
Gay people are actually nice people that are just suffering very much from the psycological trauma they have. Of course they were disgusted by the pornography and insults which just made them more ostracized by helping to enforcce the "we've gotta stick together and be gay" mentality among themselves.
That's why for 230+ years they didn't get help.
Now that we understand them, we should help them. Don't hate homosexuals because they really aren't homosexual. You should instead hate homosexuality, the lie which these poor people are sadly using to bury and therefore perpetuate their pain and psycological trauma.
I once wrote an article on this but I haven't published it yet. When I do you can be assured that it will have critical acliam and completely change what we percieve about gays.
Ultimately it will culminate in me winning the Nobel Prize for the development of psycology and all of you guys saying that I had been right all along and after all. XD
I once wrote an article on this but I haven't published it yet. When I do you can be assured that it will have critical acliam and completely change what we percieve about gays.
I hope you have a really good editor to help you spell acclaim and perceive.
Hey, it is difficult to type super fast like I do. In case you haven't noticed, my messages are like grand speeches while people who dispute them such as yourself (Among others) only reply in short anecdotes.
Why don't you try to write everything that I have written without making any typos!
PS: Thanks for writing acclaim and perceive. I had always thought it was I before E except after C but it seems this is an exception. Anyway, I don't need an editor because I am an excellent editor myself.
I, like I'm sure most, don't really care what gays do; it's their personal business. They just need to keep it personal and quit forcing their agenda on the public. I don't have to accept you and no amount of ranting and protesting is going to change that. Go about your business and leave me out of it.
There are many words ending in ise/ize. For instance;- ''legalise'', pasteurise, capitalise, and marginalise. The difference in spelling comes from the U.S./U.K, versions of English. In the U.S, it is more common to use the 'ize' ending, whereas in the U.K, ise is almost always used without exception. Both endings are acceptable variant spellings. The post uses the term ''il''legalize, to make illegal something which is currently legal.
That is right! You are not so stupid after all it seems, mr. altris.
Oh wait, sorry. I thought you were mr. altris but it seem you are mr. antrim instead.
I made this mistake because you both use the british flag so you can understand why it happened so.
Anyway, if you can, please declare mr. altris as an enemy because trust me, he is stupid. Just go read some of the things he has written. They are full of grammar mistakes.
He seems to think that WORDS is a plural word. While that is true, in the context in which he used it (Which I have addreessed) in a different post, it is actually 1 whole concept (That which is spoken) which means that he should have used illustrate.
Anyway, from that you can know that he is SUPER STUPID, so if you are smart which I assume you are, you should declare him an enemy. I will do so too! XD
Yes, and for me too. But I think you should have accepted the meaning of this bastardized word, which is a corruption of the English language, and pursued your argument on it's intended meaning within the context of the question. The little squiggly red line tells us all that the word isn't recognized, but when education fails us we tend to invent words which illustrates what we mean. This is how languages, especially English, expand when new words are formed and through constant use are accepted into the legitimate vocabulary.
we tend to invent words that illustrates what we mean
IT SHOULD BE >>>Illustrate
I think you need to go back to school mr. antris. While you are there, ask the teacher to teach you what IILEGALISE means! IT IS A REAL WORD! You are just stupid, though you wouldn't even know that as you are SUPER STUPID.
It is not for anyone to pass judgment on those whose deviant form of sexuality is a condition of birth, not of choice. Homosexuals quite rightly, have the same legal status as heterosexuals and should be treated in every way with the same respect and consideration as everyone else. Homosexuals, who were victims of the prejudiced judgments of conceited bigots include, the brilliant British scientist/mathematician Alan Turing whose work at the code deciphering centre at Bletchley Park, England saved countless allied lives and is considered by military analysts to have shortened the war by 6 months. Along with his colleagues he is accredited as the inventor of the world's first programmable computer. As a result of official hounding and the judgmental prejudiced neanderthals he committed suicide. Then we had the Irish literary genius, Oscar Wilde who was sent to prison for homosexual indecency. How the pompous fools sat, and still do, in judgment of those outstandingly brilliant human beings who happened to be born with a deviant form of sexuality.
Hey! I just noticed that there was this british guy named Altris or something who mentioned Alan Turing! This is great, it seems everybody has seen The Imitation Game! A wonderful movie made by gays which proves how sick and twisted homosexuality is!
They tried to promote homosexuality with the film but all it did was make clear how wrong homosexuality is.
You see, homoseuxality is just a lie traumatised people use to cover up the true roots of their psycological pain.
In the show, Alan Turing is a normal boy who has difficulty fitting in. People bully him not because he is gay or shows gay tendencies but simply because they can.
You see, the just enjoy being able to make somebody suffer as most bullies do. But then, he has this one friend who helps him among everybody else. Hence, he becomes so obsessed and psycologically dependant on him as an only friend, that he eventually develops pseudo-feelings of attraction for him.
In reality, it demonstrates his unhealthy psycological "leech" attraction to his friend.
Homosexuals aren't actually homos. They;re just using it to deny the real reasons of their psycological pains.
So there, now you all know I am right as The Imitation game is actually supposed to be a pro-gay film.
Also, who else liked the performance of Eric Pumbercatch? He was great in the show, really demonstrating the profound trickery people tell themselves to cover up their true psycological trauma.
I am not homophobic because there is no such thing as homosexuality. Homosexuality is just a lie supposedly gay people use to hide what really traumatises them. Instead of going along with their lie which is actually HURTING them, we should give them psycological help and oppose homosexuality.
Also I don't understand your supreme court reference. Are you saying I am gay? Because I am not.
I am not homophobic because there is no such thing as homosexuality.
You are homophobic and statistically more likely to be a homosexual.
Also I don't understand your supreme court reference.
You are probably gay and you can't come out of the closet because the people around you are bigots and you are mirroring their behavior to remain hidden.
1. Did you just arbitrarily make up statistics or are they the fabrications of gay lobbyist pseudo-scientists.
2. In case you forgot, there is no such thing as coming out from the closet. That is simply a lie gays tell to mean that they are further stuffing themselves into another closet.
3. I am not a homophobe because there is no such thing as homosexuality. The fact that you are so desperately insisting that I am a homosexual possibly means that you are in fact a homosexual.
It is ok, you can get help, I won't judge you. Once you have confronted the true roots of your psycological trauma, you will fell much better.
2. You can't come out of the closet with that attitude at least. You will some day.
3. Said the homophobe. There has only been a pattern with people denying being homosexuals. No pattern with people who try to convince gay men to be themselves.
I hope one day you can stop pretending that you are straight and have the life you deserve. Fortunately, the gay community is fighting for your rights.
And are your scientists named fifi, fufu and pringles? Your real science is just imaginary animals jumping around in white suits. Real scientists and psycologists are proving that homosexuality isn't real.
2. I can't because I am not in de closet.
3. I am not a homophobe because homosexuality doesn't exist! I can't be afraid of nothing as nothing is quite simply, nothing!
You are the person who is pretendig mr. whiNybiTcH
1. I think you misunderstood me. I am the one using actual scientists. You are using imaginary animals.
2. Convincing of what? I can't remember what I wrote last and i'm waaay to tired to check it but since I stand by everything I have said and you are disagreeing to it, I can safely say that I disagree with your disagreeing to my argument which you have disagreed to.
3. No, you are misunderstanding me again. I am the one who is saying that I can't be afraid of nothing. Since homosexuality is just like nothing because it doesn't exist, I am neither afraid of it and nor does it exist (Since as you have said yourself, I cannot be afraid of nothing and homosexuality is nothing) XD
4. Says the person who is actually not real.
Since you are not real you cannot pretend that I am real, which means that I am real and you are not.
1. All of your scientists have been refuted more recently. It turns out they were lying.
2. You said you weren't in the closet, which means you already came out of the closet. I was successfully able to convince you that you were really gay.
3. There is nothing to misunderstand. You are a very simple person. You clearly fear the gays. You keep claiming that you don't, but everything you do says otherwise. And, you claim you can't fear something that doesn't exist. Therefore, you are admitting that gays exist.
1. Says the person who thinks my scientists don't exist! That just proves that you're making stuff up! The scientists I quote do exist and they can't be disproven because they are right.
2. No, that is wrong. You seem to not understand simple English. I did not say "I am not in the closet", "I said I waasn't in the closet" which means that I wasnever in the closet in the first place. Your lack of understanding of English, makes you both stupid and wrong. LOL
3. That is a baseless and incorrect claim. I do not fear them because they do not exist (Or rather, homosexuality doesn't exist, which makes them just lying straight people whom I do not fear) hence you are wrong. Homosexuality doesn't exist, nor do I fear it since as you have said before, I cannot be afraid of nothing.
4. HAH! YOU ADMIT THAT YOU ARE NOT REAL! I KNEW IT! You must be a stupid spam robot or something. I should have known. Well played stupid robot. You have wasted my time.
1. A: THERE ARE SO MANY STUDIES OUT THERE! JUST GOOGLE IT! You are like an idiot demanding evidence for the existence of a burger even though a burger clearly exists and yOU COULD JUST GOOGLE IT LIKE RIGHT NOW! Also, I am one of the many scientists too and based on my own studies on a small gay community of about a hunded or so gays, I AM correct. About more than half of them have become cured from being gay and are now happy, normal people, while the rest are still undergoing so far successful therapy sessions.
2. So that means I am not and was never gay. :)
3. It is highly likely that I fear something since everybody scientifically and statistically speaking, fears something, What I said was that I cannot fear nothing (You yourself agreed to that) so since homosexuality is like nothing, Ido not fear it.
4. That sounds funny. Also, you are not real. You admitted to that yourself so there really isn't a debate :)
Also, I looked up what circular logic means. I did not realise you were insinuating that I was lying, so I agreed. Now disagree because it is not true.
1. I did. They have all been shown to be false. I GOOGLED IT. IT SAYS YOU ARE WRONG. Google says you are wrong. Where is your published paper? Being around 100 gay people all the time must help you with your desires. Good choice. ;)
2. No, it means you are now and will always be gay. But I can see how no one would interpret what I said the way you interpreted it.
3. And normal people fear something other than homosexuality. Since you can't fear nothing, and you do fear homosexuality, homosexuality must exist.
4. No, I admitted that I knew you weren't real.
It is amazing that someone who uses circular logic so well wouldn't know what it means.
1. Ahh, that is because you are either lying or using opposite search. Let me explain. Either you are lying or instead of inputting "Why homosexuality isn't real" you wrote "Why homosexuality is real".
My and my colleagues studies are many but also quite new so it will be awhile before a lot shows up. You have to type the correct phrase. That or you are lying, which I believe you are.
Oh and that last allegation is ridiculous. I am there to help them become not gay. Most have already quit their horrible gay addictions.
2. That is wrong and if you don't know that you are stupid. I am not gay.
3. That would be right except I do not fear homosexuality because IT DOESN'T exist. Hence your logic (Or lack thereof) is fallacious.
4. I don't know what it means (Or rather, I didn't) because I do not use circular logic.
Think about it, you think I am not real and you say I am not real, yet in fact, it is you who are not real because you yourself have admitted so.
If you are telling the truth that you are not real, then you must be lying that I am not as something that is not real (you) cannot have thoughts on wether something else (me) is real or not.
If you were telling a lie that you are not real, then it is possible that I am not real. However, I and my friends and pretty much everybody know that I am real. According to Renee Descartes (Who by the way was a real stupid idiot but somehow managed to say one smart thing in his stupid existence)
I think therefore I am, therefore I definitely exist.
Hence because what you said about my non-existence is false, it must necessarily be that you are lying which hence leads us to the conclusion that you are lying (Obviously)
Recall the first assumption that you were lying about existing. If you were, you must certainly have been lying about my non-existence and since we have established that no#2 is a lie (Since I do truly exist) it would then only make sense hat assumption 1 is correct.
(Since according to assumption 2: I do not exist. Which has been proven to be incorrect.)
Therefore it becomes impossible that assumption 2 exists.
So there, that is definitive proof that you DO NOT EXIST.
That actually makes me feel stupid. If you do not exist, why have I gone to such lengths to prove that you do not exist. After all, since you do not exist, I shouldn't have to care what you say.
I think you might not be a robot after all. Maybe you are a voice inside me, telling me to ignore stupid people (Not you since you do not exist although the things you say are stupid)
So...thanks I guess.
You've taught me a lot. In the future when I meet a stupid person like you (Even though that isn't quite true since you don't exist) I will ignore him.
That would save me a lot of time!
HEY! You are a good thing (Or should I say force for good) after all!
So thank you Mr. Non-existent Cartman. I will ignore you from now on.
1. No I did a search for homosexuals being traumatized.
2. You should really consider not lying any more. You will live a much happier life.
3. You clearly do fear homosexuality. You are the one with the logical fallacy. You are begging the question. You are claiming something doesn't exist because you can't fear something that doesn't exist, then claiming that is the reason why you don't fear it.
4. It is incredible that someone who uses circular logic so well doesn't know what it is.
I never admitted that I wasn't real. You are using double circular logic. You created a circular argument to show I wasn't real, and you used the reaction to your circular argument as a false admission of not being real. Now you are claiming your original circular argument is true because of me admitting I wasn't real AFTER you made the circular argument. Bravo on your circular expertise.
If you are telling the truth that you are not real
Oh no, you are now going to make a massive logical leap based on a faulty premise.
I think therefore I am, therefore I definitely exist.
This actually calls your existence into question quite a bit. :D
That actually makes me feel stupid.
It should, but for all the wrong reasons apparently.
That is very stupid. I am sorry but you need to know that you are very stupid indeed. Take it from me, I have spoken with many stupid people, in particular, Outlaw60, so trust me when I say that you are very stupid (And by that I mean you can be assuredly sure that you are very stupid indeed.)
No! I'm stupid and I like oppressing the gay people so that they will be sad forever because I am evil and I support gay marrige which is in fact HURTING the gays whom are NOT ACTUALLY GAY!
Sadly, this is the smartest thing you have said and it was sarcastic. You are stupid and you do like oppressing gay people. The funny thing is by admitting you are stupid and like oppressing gay people we can safely ignore your assessment about gay marriage gaming gays.
No, I don't mean I am stupid and I like opressing gays. I only wrote this here to tell everybody that anybody that agrees on this section is stupid and opresses gays! Like you said, it is sarcasm.
I am not in any way saying that I am stupid, I am sarcastically stating that anybody who would agree with keeping gay marrige legal is stupid and opressess gays. So logically therefore...
You are stupid and you oppress gays whom are not actually gay as homosexuality doesn't exist! (No offense)
I simply wrote that to achieve 50 characters so that I could post without the site telling me that I could not post since any post of mine that is less than 50 characters is potentially a dumb joke (According to the site)
The fact that you don't understand that means that you are a dumb joke. (No offense)
I am not against gay people. Gay people are sad, psycologically traumatised people who need help. I hate homosexuality. If you don't understand, go read my first argument against homosexuality
2. You are completely ignoring every good argument I have presented you. It seems that it is not that you don't agree with me. I am sure you can see the error of your beliefs now, but because you are so stubborn and insisting on your stupid belief, you refuse to agree and are now resorting to denial without any evidence at all!
3. No, it seems you did not understand what I meant when I said it doesn't exist. I am saying that nobody is homosexual in reality as it is just a cover up for psycological trauma. However, traumatised people practising homosexuality do esxist, as such, I am against their practice but not them.
I HATE THEIR ACTIONS. I DO NOT HATE THEM. Really, gay people are not gay, they are just poor, misunderstood people who need a friend who will actually help them cure their real problem and not encourage them to be gay and therefore depressed.
4. That is just you being a sour apple because you clearly cannot out-think or out-argue me.
PS: PLEASE RESPON D ONE ARGUMENT AT A TIME> IF YOU RESPOND AT MULTOIPLE TIMES, HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO KNO W THAT YOU HAVE RESPOnDED!
Theykeep getting phased out of the recent disputes box! ONE AT A TIME PLEASE! I want to cou nter all your stupid arguments. (No offense)
1. It is not baseless. I was basing that fact on your arguments against gays. It is not stupid since it is accurate. And clearly you were trying to be offensive. It didn't work though.
2. Every "good" argument you have presented me has been shown to be fake for the last 30 years. The only stubborn person here is the one who believes the same thing that hasn't been accepted by psychologists for decades.
3. Of course I don't understand what you mean when you say it doesn't exist or when you say it exists because those are contradictory statements. You are against them and you are for the practice (statistically speaking)
You are jealous of their actions because you can't freely partake because of the bigots in your life that will judge you.
4. I am being a sour apple because I live in reality and you don't.
I am sorry that you can't keep up with my arguments.
