CreateDebate


Debate Info

8
6
NO. That’s STUPID YES. That’s SMART
Debate Score:14
Arguments:14
Total Votes:17
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 NO. That’s STUPID (8)
 
 YES. That’s SMART (6)

Debate Creator

excon(15058) pic



Should we send our kids to school to PREVENT them from being raped??

Hello:

Somebody on the right, most likely FOX News, is suggesting to its viewers that we SHOULD send children to school if it SAVES one child from being molested by a parent.. 

Wha???

I'm thinking that risking MILLIONS of children, their teachers, and their family isn't worth saving even ONE child from being molested..  And, even if it DID save a kid from their abusive parent during school hours, the child WILL come home..  What am I missing here?

OR, right wingers COULD believe that the virus is a hoax, and sending kids to school risks NOTHING..  In fact, NOT sending kids to school is a Democrat plot.

Seriously??

excon

NO. That’s STUPID

Side Score: 8
VS.

YES. That’s SMART

Side Score: 6
No arguments found. Add one!
1 point

Should we send our kids to school to PREVENT them from being raped??

Yes, and to prevent them from dying by being bitten by dogs they are around too long,. Why? Well...if we can save one child...

I mean, if it saves one child to not have tvs, cars, stoves, etc, we should definitely shut down our entire way of life to prevent one child death.

Oh, and if banning water saves a life, we should definitely ban water too....

Why? Well Leftism silly boy. Leftism.

Side: YES. That’s SMART
1 point

Oh, and if banning water saves a life, we should definitely ban water too....

How would banning water ever save a life you hilariously stupid imbecile?

Side: NO. That’s STUPID
BRONT(400) Disputed
0 points

How would banning water ever save a life you hilariously stupid imbecile?

You don't like leftist logic Nom? I mean, surely you desire to save a child from drowning even if it's just one child? No? Nazi, Nazi, Nazi.

Side: YES. That’s SMART
1 point

Yeah, think hard about it bro.

I'll give you ten bucks if you can write an answer which doesn't start with "the left" you crazy bastard.

Side: NO. That’s STUPID
0 points

Somebody on the right, most likely FOX News, is suggesting to its viewers that we SHOULD send children to school if it SAVES one child from being molested by a parent..

Nope. It was me mocking the "if we can save just one life" narrative of the left.

I'm thinking that risking MILLIONS of children, their teachers, and their family isn't worth saving even ONE child from being molested.. And, even if it DID save a kid from their abusive parent during school hours, the child WILL come home.. What am I missing here?

What are you missing? Well,if you're watching only left wing news outlets, you're missing about 3/4 of the news. For example? Some places have already put their kids back in school. So any objective observer would be interested in that data. By objective we can definitely exclude CNN...

FACTS AND SCIENCE AND STUFF-

No evidence of secondary transmission of COVID-19 from children attending school in Ireland, 2020

•As many countries begin to lift some of the restrictions to contain COVID-19 spread, lack of evidence of transmission in the school setting remains. We examined Irish notifications of SARS-CoV2 in the school setting before school closures on 12 March 2020 and identified no paediatric transmission. This adds to current evidence that children do not appear to be drivers of transmission, and we argue that reopening schools should be considered safe accompanied by certain measures.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7268273/

°

•The country (Iceland) did not close elementary schools, stores or child care facilities, but did ban gatherings of more than 20 people.

Stefansson reports that children younger than age 10 are less likely to contract the coronavirus than adults. Even if they do contract it, they are also less likely to spread the virus to adults.

“Children under 10 are less likely to get infected than adults and if they get infected, they are less likely to get seriously ill,” Stefansson said in an interview with Highfield later posted to the Science Museum Group's website. “What is interesting is that even if children do get infected, they are less likely to transmit the disease to others. We have not found a single instance of a child infecting parents.”

https://patientdaily.com/stories/536705605-ceo-of-iceland-genetics-company-says-children-with-covid-19-less-likely-to-spread-virus-to-adults

Side: YES. That’s SMART
1 point

I'll give you ten bucks if you can write an answer which doesn't start with "the left"

And then the reply:-

It was me mocking the "if we can save just one life" narrative of the left.

Simply priceless. You are a RIDICULOUSLY deranged Nazi idiot.

Side: NO. That’s STUPID
BRONT(400) Disputed
1 point

I'll give you ten bucks if you can write an answer which doesn't start with "the left"

And then the reply:-

It was me mocking the "if we can save just one life" narrative of the left.

Simply priceless. You are a RIDICULOUSLY deranged Nazi idiot.

Struggling to defend your brainless religion, eh Nom? How is Lord Moloch doing today buddy?

Side: YES. That’s SMART