Should you marry out of love or out of money?
If you love someone but the finacial part of your marriage will be hard/difficult/stressful, do you still get married. Or do you marry someone that will be able to be supportive finacially but you don't necessary love them?
|
1
point
Marriage is not a prerequisite for love, nor does it help to maintain it (see the numerous divorce cases), From what I can see, the only purpose it serves outside of a religious context is to establish inheritance and insurance rights. I believe we should not marry at all. Side: Marriage is outdated
1
point
I agree with you, but one other thing marriage does, is help to cut down on the number of people with hyphenated last names. Imagine two people with hyphenated last names have children together. Those children would potentially have hyphenated hyphenated last names, and it wouldn't be long before two people with four last names have children with eight last names. Side: Marriage is outdated
1
point
0
points
0
points
in my case marriage is very important thing in our lives even the most important one, so people should be very responsible for their actions and if they decided to marry they should love their partners but not love their financial position. I think that money in comparison with human qualities is nothing. if you have money - it is good, if not - you can earn it! but if you do not like a person except his\her money there is nothing to do with that to be happy Side: out of love
1
point
0
points
you should marry out of love, and only when that love has become stable enough to handle itself. marriage is not a tool to help love advance, but rather a statement of the love. that statement allows the couple to carry on their relationship under law, religion, and tradition. It give helpful benefits to the couple, but only if love is involved. Side: out of love
1
point
|
