Silencing the Debater: Yay or Nay?
Okay, I've been silenced three times in the past few days and this is how:
First I was banned from a debate:
Just a joke from someone who is a friend, Haha Ax!
Second and Third:
Two different debaters replied to me in a less than hospitable way and then closed their debates so I couldn't respond.
What is your opinion of this tactic? Dirty? Cowardly?
Or is it fair game?
Yes! Shut them up!
Side Score: 0
|
No, opinions count!
Side Score: 42
|
|
|
|
No arguments found. Add one!
|
11
points
3
points
Don't worry about it, Hellno. If you didn't rub somebody the wrong way, then you weren't doing your job. LoL I don't think I would shut anybody down unless it was ridiculously out of hand and someone was just getting vicious and attacking instead of debating. Side: No, opinions count!
1
point
Opinions count, definitely. I got threatened to be banned just because I was Christian and my opinion differed from his own. He beetled off somewhere though and I haven't seen him since which is rather awesome if I may say so myself. Silencing a debater kind of contradicts itself in an odd way but if there is a troll/imbecile ruining the mood of your debate - you have the right to give him the boot :) Side: No, opinions count!
There are so many cowards on this site. I am sure that a couple of them are actually reasonably well-known members here who have created a seperate account to up-vote their own posts so as to gain extra points plus to appear that some are in agreement with them. Pathetic. Absolutely shameful lol! Side: No, opinions count!
|