Snappys 2013 - Category #16 MOST CLUELESS

Hellno (17753)

1 point

I like them both a lot but I have to agree.... Srom has matured a lot the past year though so I'll go with Dana even though she'll be pissed at me I'm sure... she's just way too wishy washy about everything... she's old enough that she needs to control her emotions... do the research, decide once and for all who the hell she is and then stand up for herself with confidence!

10 years ago

Sitara (11080) Disputed

1 point

I know who the fuck I am, oh "libertarian" who voted for Hillary.

10 years ago

GuitarGuy (6096)

1 point

She is definitely going to win Most Annoying. . .

10 years ago

Centifolia (1319)

2 points

Do we really need a most clueless award when the nominees are the old members? (aka most experienced)

10 years ago

LizziexLaura (4278)

1 point

It is slightly unfair. I can see why you say this.

10 years ago

GuitaristDog (2548)

2 points

I nominate Numm and Kozlov.

10 years ago

hannah165 (523)

2 points

Lolzors .

10 years ago

Elvira (3446)

1 point

I nominate myself. I admit I have entered arguments where I knew barely anything about the subject matter...

10 years ago

Quocalimar (6470)

1 point

I'll just go with popular opinion here and say one of our resident, friendly trolls.

10 years ago

Sitara (11080)

-1 points

Hellno because he is a judgemental hypocrite who calls himself a libertarian and voted for Hillary.

10 years ago

GuitarGuy (6096) Disputed

2 points

You're just saying that because he voted for you.

10 years ago

Sitara (11080) Clarified

1 point

Not really. .

10 years ago

GuitarGuy (6096) Disputed

1 point

Uhhh... yeah you are. You don't have any other reason to vote for him. You guys are on complete opposite sides of the scale in this category and you happen to be the one who is closest to winning.

10 years ago

Sitara (11080) Disputed

1 point

Let me present my case first. He said that I am the on who is confused, yet he is a libertarian who voted for Hillary? You voted for me, but I did not judge you so your logic does not compute.

10 years ago

GuitarGuy (6096) Disputed

2 points

He said that he voted for her because she was the "lesser of the evils". That doesn't make him clueless. I voted for you because you ARE clueless, and each argument you make is further proof.

10 years ago

Hellno (17753) Disputed

2 points

Once again you prove me right... you only voted for me because I agreed with GuitarGuy... you can't control your emotions. As for Hillary... everyone knew after W Bush that the next POTUS would be a Democrat... in the primary I voted for Hill-dog because she was the lesser of two evils. I voted for McCain in the general and still would have even if Hillary won the primary... maybe you haven't noticed but they're aren't too many viable libertarian candidates to vote for out there.

10 years ago

Sitara (11080) Disputed

0 points

Actually no. I voted for you because you are a hypocrite. You are NOT a libertarian if you voted for her: not that there is anything wrong with that.

10 years ago

Sitara (11080) Disputed

0 points

Ron Paul, biznatch! He is more libertarian than you will ever be!

10 years ago

Chuz-Life (497)

-2 points

Sitara (11080) Clarified

4 points

We get it, you hate abortion. Try to find a hobby. Both sides of the abortion debate are nucking futs.

10 years ago

Chuz-Life (497) Clarified

0 points

I can't turn my back on what I feel is a violation of human rights, Dana.

And it's not abortion that I hate... There are cases where I actually think an abortion can be justified.

What I hate are clueless idiots who can't even admit that an abortion kills a child. Dullards who deny the fact that a human being in the fetal stage of their life is a human being. Etc.

10 years ago

Sitara (11080) Clarified

2 points

I am upset at people who are too dogmatic on either side. A 100% ban on abortion is bad for women, but I am only for theraputic abortion in the case of trauma to the mother, not elective abortion for any reason. Neither side will accept me. I do agree 100% on the FACTS that abortion kills a BABY who's LIFE BEGINS AT CONCEPTION, though. The fetus is also proven scientifically t5o be a human being. The defination of a human being is someone who is a member of the human species. I challenge any state educated moron on this board to prove that the human fetus is another species. I will give them 100 dollars if they can.

10 years ago

CrocoDuck (28) Disputed

0 points

That is your opinion, based on your present religion and no one gives a shit about it... you keep making same debate over and over and keep loosing them...

10 years ago

Chuz-Life (497) Disputed

2 points

1. I am not religious and I don't base my views on abortion on any religious views. I could be an all out Satanist and it wouldn't change my views on abortion at all.

2. I see it (abortion) as a human rights issue and as a violation of human rights because a human being is killed after being denied their rights and the protections of our laws. That fact doesn't have anything to do with religion.

3. I haven't lost any debates on this subject at all. Being outnumbered in a debate thread on this site - by a bunch of trolls and idiots - is not something I would ever see as a loss.

P.S. - Only Chicken shits use troll accounts to attack others like you did. Not that I expected anything less. I'm just calling you out on it.

10 years ago

Sitara (11080) Disputed

1 point

He is not a Christian, dude. .

10 years ago