CreateDebate


Debate Info

4
2
proposition: it must be banned opposition: no, it should not.
Debate Score:6
Arguments:12
Total Votes:6
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 proposition: it must be banned (4)
 
 opposition: no, it should not. (1)

Debate Creator

Daemon(27) pic



THW: ban the Deep Web

More than 99% of the world is hidden beneath the surface known as the Deep Web. The deep web is a part of the internet which cannot be indexed by search engines, such as Google. While the internet we know makes up 17 terabytes, the Deep web has an astonishing amount of more than 7,500 terabytes. The US military had made this vast plain of unknown internet in order to make secret missions such as tracking hackers easier, and for the past years, it has proved useful. However, there is a negative side to the Deep Web as well. People like Ross Ulbricht has been making sites like the Silk Road, a site where drugs like cocaine are bought or sold. Ross Ulbricht, owner of this website, has been arrested, but the number of the corrupted sites is only increasing.

Should the government ban the Deep Web because of these problem, or should it let it run still for better military uses?

 

sites for you to see:

wikipedia article about the Deep Web

the Silk Road(online marketplace in the Deep Web)

the good and bad of the Deep Web

proposition: it must be banned

Side Score: 4
VS.

opposition: no, it should not.

Side Score: 2

Dang, I had no idea stuff like this existed. Anyways... I believe it should be banned because as the old saying goes:

"If what you are doing is really innocent, then you shouldn't have to hide it"

:D

Side: proposition: it must be banned
JustIgnoreMe(4290) Clarified
1 point

It was basically developed and funded by the military and used by spies, but they wanted it publicly available to have their traffic blend in.

It is generally accepted nowadays that the NSA has found a way to deanonymize most users anyway.

Side: proposition: it must be banned
2 points

I think the NSA have made it impossible to advocate banning Tor. It is the only way to communicate now that cannot be harvested and stored by them. You don't have to be a criminal to use it you just have to be someone that values the fact that your communications won't be stolen by government organisations. The last sentence sounds like I am a conspiracy theorist but unfortunately wikileaks has shown that the conspiracy theorists were right. I don't think even the wildest of them could have imagined that the NSA would have put a balloons in the sky to mimic cell towers to collect the private communications of whole cities...

Side: opposition: no, it should not.
Amarel(5669) Clarified
1 point

It is the only way to communicate now that cannot be harvested and stored by them

How do you know this?

Side: proposition: it must be banned
Atrag(5666) Disputed
1 point

Because I understand how tor works.

Side: proposition: it must be banned