CreateDebate


Debate Info

13
6
Agree - many advantages Disagree - many disadvantages
Debate Score:19
Arguments:16
Total Votes:26
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Agree - many advantages (9)
 
 Disagree - many disadvantages (5)

Debate Creator

bmckeown(5) pic



TV News Reports are great!

Television is a popular place many people receive their news, but is it as great as it is made out to be?

Agree - many advantages

Side Score: 13
VS.

Disagree - many disadvantages

Side Score: 6
2 points

It is really fabulous being able to, not only hear, but hear and see all the Bolshevik fake news, left wing fabrications and communist lies in wonderful technicolor.

Side: Agree - many advantages
1 point

TV News Reports are great!

Hello b:

Lemme see... Do I trust Lester Holt over Rush Limprod?? I DO.. Do I trust the NYT over the Washington Examiner?? I DO. Do I trust Thom Hartman over right wing talk radio?? I DO. Do I trust MSNBC over FOX News?? I DO!!

One side of that group tells LIES, and the other tells the TRUTH. Could I convince you that the truth IS the truth? Nahh..

excon

Side: Agree - many advantages
2 points

Truth, like the Russian Collusion Hoax perpetrated by your favored networks and rags?

Side: Disagree - many disadvantages
TaterOfTot(40) Disputed
1 point

Lemme see... Do I trust Lester Holt over Rush Limprod?? I DO.. Do I trust the NYT over the Washington Examiner?? I DO. Do I trust Thom Hartman over right wing talk radio?? I DO. Do I trust MSNBC over FOX News?? I DO!!

One side of that group tells LIES, and the other tells the TRUTH. Could I convince you that the truth IS the truth?

And why is that? There are thousands of debates on this site proving left wing stories fake and false, and you aren't debunking anything right wing. Why is that? Is it that there's little to nothing for you to debunk?

Side: Disagree - many disadvantages
TaterOfTot(40) Disputed
1 point

Do I trust Lester Holt

NBC's Lester Holt emerges from debate bruised and partisan

But when Holt wasn't being invisible, he was targeting Trump's weaknesses while avoiding Clinton's.

That's not to say the Republican nominee shouldn't have been challenged or fact-checked. But as we've seen throughout this general election campaign, only one candidate is getting fact-checked while the other largely gets a pass.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/media/297978-nbcs-lester-holt-emerges-from-debate-bruised-and-partisan?amp

Rush Limprod

Give us a list of times Rush provably lied. Now explain why you trust outlets that have thrown 5,000 claims at Trump which have been proven to be fake, false, and phony. Also explain why you trust a media funded by the Chinese Communist Party that is running cover for Communists.

https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/12/21/one-of-americas-biggest-chinese-language-newspapers-toes-beijings-party-line-china-influence-united-front/

Side: Disagree - many disadvantages
1 point

It has plenty of advantages. People need to do some research though to make sure they aren't just soaking in one side to a story. It's important to realize news reports can and are very biased.

Side: Agree - many advantages
Metroid(73) Disputed
0 points

You having fun watching the left burn down their own cities Mint?

Side: Disagree - many disadvantages
Mint_tea(4641) Disputed
1 point

Nope. Not even a little. I don't care what side you're on, you burn your own city you are a dumbass.

Side: Agree - many advantages
excon(18261) Disputed
1 point

You having fun watching the left burn down their own cities

Hello Met:

It's true.. The "organizers" should have arranged for buses so they could burn the burbs..

excon

Side: Agree - many advantages
No arguments found. Add one!