CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:67
Arguments:48
Total Votes:69
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
  (46)

Debate Creator

nummi(1432) pic



If humans created artificial intelligence would humans then be Gods?

AIs that can spread and reproduce on their own. Can advance itself, essentially meaning it can evolve. Would humans in that scenario be considered Gods?

Add New Argument
3 points

I myself wouldn't consider us as Gods.

I intended this debate mainly for the religious, to see what they have to say about something like this. The creating of something intelligent and fully capable of "living" and surviving, and (yeah, I know, they deny it... a lot of them at least) evolving (all that is different from our perspective of "life" but still the same, simply different). The creation of that - something the religious seem to claim only God can do. And if humans did the same, what would they say then?

It is my first debate... Should I add this up there?

2 points

Well, in the religious aspects, no, we would not be Gods. For the sake of the argument. Lets pretend God is real. He supposedly created planets out of nothing, and created loving, angry, shameful, happy life out of it all. Completely original. If man kind were to do it, it would be because he is intelligent enough to do so. There is nothing Godly about it!

3 points

No. We define Gods as being all powerful. Humans are not all powerful just because the natural process of evolution may apply to some artificial intelligence we may create.

No matter what we do, we are slaves to nature. Nature causes us to develop. Nature causes us to develop technology. And if our technology develops on it's own, without our intervention, then that will mean it was just another act of nature.

2 points

Well, by the "technical" definition of a god, we wouldn't be. It would be damn impressive, though, even if we weren't omnipotent. Assuming Skynet doesn't wipe us out, anyways...

2 points

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.(Jhon1)

And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.(Jhon14)

Dremorius(861) Clarified
4 points

Only the bird is the word!

2 points

I dont think. Its like, entities who create 'life' as we know it are called 'Gods'. Artificail intelligence is something that we dream and design within the limitations of our existing resources whereas, God as we know, did create all what we see from nothing (so says the Bible, I dont think there is any other books that doesnt have a claim any different from this)

We inturn was created by something more powerful, then how can we create something less superior that ourself by resources that is not ours and still call us Gods?

2 points

It would just depend on what exactly you mean by 'God' as definitions vary. according to me, unless the human (only the creator not every human) cared for and took the responsibility for her/his creation, no that person does not become god

it also depends on how the created responds

2 points

I don't think we should be considered Gods or gods. Just creating something that is artificially intelligent really doesn't mean anything. It would be more meaningful if we discovered how to create life from the primordial soup. Either way, it is only using things we have been giveth, not being the creator of something from nothing.

2 points

I don't believe that humans created anything.

Everything was created by God, including artificial intelligence.

nummi(1432) Disputed
2 points

Okay, I'll follow your "logic". God created humans then humans created "programs" that could think for themselves, just like humans can think, and when given the necessary tools also spread, survive, and advance themselves. In that scenario, when exactly did God create artificial intelligence? Or are you saying everything that humans create is created by God?

_deleted0_(850) Disputed
2 points

I don't really know what how to epress myself on this one.

Im not saying something is the right answer and something its the wrong one, this is just what I believe.

I believe that God puts minds in our heads. I don't think we think by our selves.

I believe God created thoughts.. you know ? can you follow me? :p I know this is weird.

But I believe that those who made a useful tool, did it by themselves, but I think God like.. put the ideas in their heads.

You understand?

2 points

Some people, I think, would get big heads and maybe consider themselves just that. I believe it depends on the person.

2 points

Definitely not. The Gods that exist in religion and culture are fixed. People who can create artificial intelligence are only considered creators or reproducers of their own kind or of a different species. This does not automatically make them God.

2 points

How would humans be gods if god created them to worship him, not for Humans to be worshiped by lower life forms. And Nummi Just one last thing...

"Your a Nob"

nummi(1432) Disputed
2 points

We are not created by any god. There is no god.

My point was. If religious people regard humans as being created by a god then would humans also be gods if we created life of our own design?

"Your a Nob"? Nob? You mean "noob"? Oh, and it is "you're" not "your". You've got some learning and growing up to do.

Just one last thing... if you think there absolutely is a god then you've got things to sort out in your mind.

Another last thing... "Lower" life forms? Really? If you think humans were created by a god then you're lower than dogs who cannot even comprehend the concept of god, not to mention worship one. And yet they are alive and mostly happy.

One more last thing... Created to worship??? Stupid much? I don't worship anyone, neither do I need to.

1 point

Religion aside, no i do not think they would be. We have still yet to master creating living organisms. Of course, we are just beginning to clone people/sheep! But we are not engineering people. Robots, with an A.I. are only held together with wires and bolts. They have no soul, feelings, and what you call A.I. i call the same as a calculator, or a computer, or a fax machine. Its all the same. You just add a voice.

KingBlack(223) Disputed
2 points

Perhaps you didnt read the description of the debate and I take it that given the development of DNA computing id say that its not impossible to develop living organisms in a manner that can support AI. Besides calculators and such use basic I/O bits where as developments in quantum computing/mechanics use far superior qubits which could make AI of the nature in which he is speaking very possible. Besides all of that, any life form or any electronic device have one thing in common in that they are all just some sort of manipulation of energy/power and what do all living organisms have in common that current machines do not, the ability of wanting and knowing how to survive to stay live, come up with a equation or formula and i am pretty sure AI will be at its best and with quantum computing on the horizon i am sure that will make it that much easier to come up with a formula/equation that can support this.

nummi(1432) Disputed
2 points

A.I. isn't exactly the same as a computer or a calculator because those things don't have free "thoughts", they follow their predesigned programs. An A.I. can think on its own and learn, just as we do.

Jungelson(3959) Disputed
2 points

No. Sir if you cared to look at what A.I. stands for, you would see it is 'Artificial' Intelligence. If these things were so life like, why call it artificial?