The Democrat party always explains which abortions are ok, but never which ones are not.
For those who would vote for the Democrat Party. If you have an ounce of integrity, and an ounce of caring for these late term lives, speak out to your Party, or any politician who will not clearly define which viable babies should be protected.
You will find that you are speaking on deaf ears. They create abortion laws that brings in the feminist and pro abortion money.
The only thing you have that will make them listen is your vote! USE IT!
If you believe what you just said, then never vote for the Democrat Party because they support No Restriction abortions. If you elect them, you are a phoney when it comes to No Restrictin abortions, and you might as well use the forcepts on those viable late term babies yourself, because it would be people like you keeping it legal.
This is not a Democrat or Republican issue. It is and has always was been a United States Constitutional issue.
The point to be made against abortion as illegality is not made as limit on a woman’s right to make self-incriminations publicly against herself. It is self-incrimination as an attack made against the United States Constitution which is what takes place with smarter intellectual ways a public can claim a felony crime can be undertaken.
The word abortion combined with pregnancy is the basic prediction of officially stopping human life. Which in turn is like asking us for permission to kill some-one. The use of wording is not limiting who is taking place in the self-incrimination when made. Abortion plus pregnancy simple pointing out the intended victim will always be a child, as aborting adults lives are not the common way people say, or will admit kill someone, by threat. Therefore some special circumstance can be applied by suggesting time frame.
THE YOUNG ARE NOT THE ONLY VICTUM. MURDER IS NOT THE ONLY CRIME THAT NEEDED JUSTIFICATION. What is important is that the self-incrimination is shared openly to the public, then spreads uncontrolled into the general population. This happens whenever the combination of wording pregnancy and abortion are suggested, medically, as natural abortions are often described as a miscarriage.
To illustrate Constitutional separation by meaning, the words Gender Specific Amputation combined together or including the word pregnancy, clearly only admit surgical removal of some kind, not the officially stop expressed by abort, which then turns into termination as the restart can never officially take place in conjunction with any plans, like let’s say aborting a medical surgery.
The second United States Constitutional argument made against direct pregnancy abortion legislation is finding public separation to the self-incrimination of declaration to Civil War. A Law is claiming intellectual right to officially forecast the end life, and not simple take steps of separation. This however address the argument made between Civil legal accusation Death Penalty and Constitutional Capital Punishment.
On a regular basis, the Left treats the Constitution as a living document than can be changed on the whims of the current culture.
This has led to the insanity of including abortion as a privacy issue spoken to in the Constitution.
This is how far the Left will twist the meaning of our constitution. The privacy clause now includes the privacy to taken an innocent life.
They twisted the Constitution to force every State to change their marriage laws, by calling it an equal right's issue. Under that sweeping logic, a man can say he should be allowed to have 30 wives in every State. He will say it is his equal right to do so.
All groups can demand anything they want under the all inclusive equal right's argument.