Debate Info

Debate Score:10
Total Votes:12
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 The Democrat party always explains which abortions are ok, but never which ones are not. (6)

Debate Creator

Cuaroc(8836) pic

The Democrat party always explains which abortions are ok, but never which ones are not.

For decades, the Democrat Party and the Left has spent all their time fighting for the right to kill unborn babies, while never distinguishing or differentiating the healthy viable late term babies that should be protected. Do you see their priorities? They are so quick to speak out on the right to kill unborn babies, but never give one thought to all the healthy late term viable babies that they should be demanding are protected.

WHERE IS THEIR TOLERANCE AND COMPASSION FOR THESE BABIES? They have NONE because these viable healthy babies with healthy mothers can not vote! It's all about big money from feminist and pro abortion lobbies! Money supercedes innocent life!

This is just one more example of their radical support for No Restriction abortions, even when the vast majority of Americans say they want restrictions on late term abortions.

To all the phoney people who say you do not agree with late term abortions for convienence, tell me what restrictions do you want and why have you not forced the Democrat party to clearly differentiate and prevent late term abortions for convienence?

If you refused to vote for them in one election cycle, clearly telling them why, we would see a new abortion bill protecting healthy viable babies within a year.

How could you vote for a Party that refuses to make abortions laws protecting the thousands of healthy viable babies with healthy mothers? The answer is obvious. You are complete phonies and could not care less for these viable babies.

Every article a read from Pro abortion extremists, speaks to how only approximately 1.7% of abortions are late term.
1.7% of 700,000 abortions per year adds up to over 10,000 per year.
Maybe you think 10,000 innocent viable lives are not worth fighting for, but that would show your lack of humanity.

The phonies who could not care less, will now say how some of those 10,000 abortions are extreme cases.
GET THE POINT! You phonies care not how many are extreme cases and how many are for convienence. No one differentiates and tries to protect those healthy viable babies killed for convienence in the 8 or 9 No Restriction abortion States.

During the Partial Birth Abortion hearings in Congress, Doctors testified that the majority of those types of late term abortions were done on Special Need's babies. The next time you watch Special Olympics on TV, I want you to think about the fact that you support killing these Special children for merely being different and diverse.
They do not look exactly like you, or they don't sound exactly like you.......KILL THEM!

You support the deaths of all viable babies for any reason everytime you vote for this radical pro abortion Democrat Party. Will that effect your vote next time. I truly doubt it because you simply DO NOT CARE, even though you deceptive phonies say you do care.
Add New Argument
2 points

The Democrat party always explains which abortions are ok, but never which ones are not.

Interesting. So say there are 10 numbers. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10.

And say, out of those ten I only like the numbers 2,7,8 and 4.

Are you not able to figure out which numbers I don't like from there?

1 point

For those who would vote for the Democrat Party. If you have an ounce of integrity, and an ounce of caring for these late term lives, speak out to your Party, or any politician who will not clearly define which viable babies should be protected.

You will find that you are speaking on deaf ears. They create abortion laws that brings in the feminist and pro abortion money.

The only thing you have that will make them listen is your vote! USE IT!


1 point

In some cases, like FromWithin, I favor post-birth abortions. Clear enough?

Preaches big against the killing of a foetus but once they're born into poverty wants there to be no safety net.


Cuaroc(8836) Clarified
1 point

Gotta get cannon fodder from somewhere.

The understanding is abortion of human pregnancy was never constitutional represented to the public. Pregnancy Abortion is a self-incriminating confession to a felony crime. It is a person intellectual saying they are, or will officially end human life.

Not only is this immoral to have anyone confess to a crime to receive medical treatment. It is legally wrong to create legislation declaring a public immunity to the mass confession of human murder. So that there is no mistake in the extent of this abuse of public trust.

The United States Constitutional expression to abortion would be wording in the line of Gender Specific Amputation. Why is the Constitutional change important? It provides the clear set boundary to expectable publicly share accessory to crime, both before and after the fact.

First things first. Though a woman has rights granted by all constitution, it is a duty and obligation of their independence to honor those rights and the burden that came with them.

2 points

Pregnancy Abortion is a self-incriminating confession to a felony crime. It is a person intellectual saying they are, or will officially end human life.

What are you talking about? The state ends life all the time. When George W Bush was governor of Texas, he put more people to death than anybody else in the history of the state.

Besides which, your argument is predicated on the very questionable premise that an undeveloped fetus without a central nervous system (i.e. cannot feel pain) is the same thing as human life.