CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:22
Arguments:23
Total Votes:24
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 The "GREAT" Richard Dawkins tells his tail, atheism is for pedophiles (21)

Debate Creator

Saintnow(3684) pic



The "GREAT" Richard Dawkins tells his tail, atheism is for pedophiles

Add New Argument
2 points

Whether he was molested by a pedophile or not has nothing to do with atheism. Dawkins didn't invent atheism.

Saintnow(3684) Disputed
1 point

You haven't read much of Dawkins, have you? .

Dawkins explains why he approves of pedophelia
ThinkerLad(267) Disputed Banned
1 point

This guy in the video is just as much an idiot as you. Dawkins doesn't 'approve' of pedophilia. Do your research because I'm not doing it for you.

Cartman(18192) Disputed Banned
1 point

You think it is a great video? The guy is attacking a victim of child abuse. You Sunday morning Christians are sick.

SlapShot(2608) Clarified
1 point

But I HAVE read a great deal of Dr. Dawkins' work, Mr. Saint. All of it in fact. So what?

But what I CAN say here, without a doubt, is that, in my opinion, your headline here on Atheism being for pedophiles is one of your worst ever. That is to say, one of your most childish, inaccurate; unfair; and slanderous. I was going to add that, you can do better than this, but maybe you can't.

You Christians have gotten busted up pretty good over the past few months here on CD by us Atheists.Especially us who know a bit of science. We continue to prove the tenets of Evolution and cite how, yeah, it IS a Theory.

Just like Gravity! And how a Theory in science is MORE than just one fact. It is a collection of proven facts and observations.

We have continually been denied by you guys and SHRED of proof or even justification for your gods. We have pointed out ad nauseum the absurdity of a claim for a loving and personal god, given the state of the world and our history, and you have failed to EVER retort with an even mildly compelling response.

Rather, you guys have resorted, or rather, REVERTED, devolved, into juvenile name-calling. Using words like moron and punk and monkey and such. I am guessing this results out of your sheer frustration at being able to present to your debate foes even a modicum of proof for your beliefs.

Attacking a victim of child abuse is loathsome. Calling atheists pedophiles is beyond absurd and something a pissed-off retard 12 year old would say when some atheist kid began to speak of Evolution in his Sunday School class.

I cannot and will not even dignify your claim with a rebuttal. We all know, including you, that it is patently false and is one of the hugest and steamiest piles of Straw Man poo poo ever assembled here on CD.

Shame on you.

SS

Saintnow(3684) Disputed
1 point

watch the video and make some intelligent comments like you want to discuss things with me here or take a hike and don't let the door hit ya where the good Lord split ya.

Cartman(18192) Disputed Banned
1 point

Why can't you go to the source of the information you dispute instead of these preachers who clearly are massively biased?

Atrag(5666) Banned
1 point

Erm... ever heard of.. I dont know... the massive child sexual abuse scandal relating to the abuse of kids by Christian priests? Or how about this passage:

"They must be dividing the spoils they took: there must be a damsel or two for each man, Spoils of dyed cloth as Sisera’s spoil, an ornate shawl or two for me in the spoil."

Does this mean that Christianity is only for pedophiles? Well it has some specific doctrine that certainly attractions them (paradise despite whatever crime + the adoration of the concept of innocence) but no of course Christianity isnt just for pedophiles. Atheism? Of course not either. You complete and utter tit.

Saintnow(3684) Disputed
1 point

Go make your own discussion if you think you have something to talk about, deviant monkey.

1 point

Have you ever heard of a atheist pedophile? I have heard of hundreds of priest ¨play¨ with children... So, you are so easily manipulated by a video.

Saintnow(3684) Disputed
1 point

So what you are trying to say is that because some people you can name are pedophiles, there is nothing wrong with Dawkins' refusal to condemn "mild" pedophilia and "mild" molestation?

Saintnow(3684) Disputed
1 point

listen you idiot, all of those priests should be in jail if not executed for molestation. Dawkins plainly says he cannot condemn what he called "mild molestation" which happened to him and many other of his classmates. It's all evil, and you are evil for gloating over a bunch of pervert priests for their evil while using that as an excuse to ignore the SICK ideas of an atheist who fails to see the evil of the person who molested him "mildly". Take a hike, you are on the top of my list with Atfag for obnoxious characters now.

now

I've heard of a lot of atheists who think there is no such thing as right or wrong....and I have to think you are one of those perverts, trying to justify your own lust.......aren't you, pervert?

1 point

I can list hundreds of priests who have been convicted or accused of molestation. Are these not considered leaders of the church and at the very least, leaders of the local church.

When will you consider that Christianity could be a ploy for old men to get sexual satisfaction from little boys?

Your arguments are so lacking in evidence that you honestly just seem to make these assumptions in your head?

Saintnow(3684) Disputed
1 point

So what you are trying to say is that because some people you can name are pedophiles, there is nothing wrong with Dawkins' refusal to condemn "mild" pedophilia and "mild" molestation?

Saintnow(3684) Disputed
1 point

I don't even want to read your garbage when you are not condemning pedophilia. Take a hike, and don't let the door hit ya where the good Lord split ya.

Saintnow(3684) Disputed
1 point

listen you idiot, all of those priests should be in jail if not executed for molestation. Dawkins plainly says he cannot condemn what he called "mild molestation" which happened to him and many other of his classmates. It's all evil, and you are evil for gloating over a bunch of pervert priests for their evil while using that as an excuse to ignore the SICK ideas of an atheist who fails to see the evil of the person who molested him "mildly". Take a hike, you are on the top of my list with Atfag for obnoxious characters now.