CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:102
Arguments:99
Total Votes:109
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 The Hypocrisy of Mr Angry ( Burrito ) as he accuses everyone of racism (96)

Debate Creator

Dermot(5796) pic



The Hypocrisy of Mr Angry ( Burrito ) as he accuses everyone of racism

Let’s have a look at what his hero’s champagne Socialists had to say about blacks and Jews ......

Marx’s racism was not limited to Jews. His contempt for other races is made clear in his enthusiasm for the work of the racist French ethnologist Pierre Tremaux. 

Marx wrote to Engels that Tremaux had “proved that the common Negro type is the degenerate form of a much higher one” and that this was “a significant advance over Darwin”.

A further example can be found in Marx’s correspondence with Engels in 1862, saying that his rival “the Jewish Nigger Lasalle” was leaving Britain to return to Germany:

“It is now absolutely clear to me that, as both the shape of his head and his hair texture shows – he descends from the Negroes who joined Moses’ flight from Egypt (unless his mother or grandmother on the paternal side hybridized with a nigger.) Now this combination of Germanness and Jewishness with a primarily negro substance necessarily creates a strange product. The pushiness of the fellow is also nigger-like.”


Add New Argument
2 points

We can all take history out of context if we want to, you sick Nazi paedophile.

Lincoln didn’t believe black people should have the same rights as white people.

His views became clear during an 1858 series of debates with his opponent in the Illinois race for U.S. Senate, Stephen Douglas, who had accused him of supporting “negro equality.”

In their fourth debate, at Charleston, Illinois, on September 18, 1858, Lincoln made his position clear. “I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races,” he began, going on to say that he opposed blacks having the right to vote, to serve on juries, to hold office and to intermarry with whites.

https://www.history.com/news/5-things-you-may-not-know-about-lincoln- slavery-and-emancipation

Was Stephen Douglas perhaps a relative of yours, you hilariously nauseating, pathetic Nazi twat?

2 points

More Lincoln quotes from the same debate:-

while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.

I have never seen, to my knowledge, a man, woman or child who was in favor of producing a perfect equality, social and political, between negroes and white men.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/hard-truths-abraham-lincoln-was-a-racist-and-the-confederacy b59932564e4b0a88ac1bc3758?guccounter=1&guce referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce referrersig=AQAAAId2IXLLfKffurwWy9VS5spmjNxuoINCIRW7 9YKIsr-Bx2cLw15hfg4x40f9YjLQJSlbimd-x_xNXAqIg8wybd0xuPFgNaS3bFUgn15O1gVEo9RldT-vnckSIEkiwlsmVwrCUD2gfk3WY0Irfbg1vkPGON7o4CbVFoSsZC2xz1r

The last quote is of course particularly interesting because it illustrates that society in general was racist during that period in history, and that what our fascist friend Dermot is doing is deliberately misleading people. He is taking people of his choosing out of that period and scrutinising them from the perspective of a society several centuries into the future.

Because he's a Nazi. And misleading people is what Nazis do.

Dermot(5796) Disputed
0 points

He is taking people of his choosing out of that period and scrutinising them from the perspective of a society several centuries into the future.

Several centuries ???? Ah ooooookay so that’s why you have no problem with the Holocaust ......got ya

TerdinaBowl(29) Disputed
1 point

Burritolunch shows the most overt racism of anyone on the sight. He and Hitler have identical positions on Jews.

0 points

Yes I noted this he detests Jews but of course that means in his fevered brain it’s everyone else who is the Nazi/Socialist

Dermot(5796) Disputed
0 points

Comrade Burito banned for gross stupidity

Bwaaaaaaahahahahahaha comrade Burritos defence is Marx’s racism is fine as there is a context for it ........Thats Socialism for ya ......

Marx on blacks , who he called ‘niggers ‘ ........

“It is now absolutely clear to me that, as both the shape of his head and his hair texture shows – he descends from the Negroes who joined Moses’ flight from Egypt (unless his mother or grandmother on the paternal side hybridized with a nigger.) Now this combination of Germanness and Jewishness with a primarily negro substance necessarily creates a strange product. The pushiness of the fellow is also nigger-like.”

Hootie(451) Disputed Banned
2 points

Bwaaaaaaahahahahahaha comrade Burritos defence is Marx’s racism is fine as there is a context for it

No, I was just trying to educate you. My "defence" is that your Nazi propaganda has zero credibility as a source:-

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-signal/

As you can see it has an "extreme far right bias".

One can also see that you haven't told anybody where your quotes are from, presumably because you are also aware of the laughable lack of credibility which the source has.

Hootie(451) Banned
2 points

Marx’s racism was not limited to Jews.

A couple of quick points here.

1) Jews are not a race. There is no historical or scientific evidence to suggest that Jews are a race. The assertion that Jews are a race is a religious belief. It is a claim made in the Christian Bible and the Jewish Torah.

2) If Jews are a race then Marx was Jewish. His mother was Jewish.

Dermot(5796) Disputed
0 points

Afraid Science and History is against your there Holocaust denier ......

For populations of the Jewish diaspora, the genetic composition of Ashkenazi, Sephardi, and Mizrahi Jewish populations show significant amounts of shared Middle Eastern ancestry. According to Behar and colleagues (2010), this is "consistent with a historical formulation of the Jewish people as descending from ancient Hebrew and Israelites of the Levant" and "the dispersion of the people of ancient Israel throughout the Old World".

JamesDD(10) Disputed
1 point

Afraid Science and History is against your there Holocaust denier

On the contrary, in keeping with every single claim you ever make, this is the exact opposite of true:-

The Invention of the Jewish People is a study of the historiography of the Jewish people by Shlomo Sand, Professor of History at Tel Aviv University.

Sand began his work by looking for research studies about forcible exile of Jews from the area now bordered by modern Israel, and its surrounding regions. He was astonished that he could find no such literature, he says, given that the expulsion of Jews from the region is viewed as a constitutive event in Jewish history. The conclusion he came to from his subsequent investigation is that the expulsion simply did not happen, that no one exiled the Jewish people from the region, and that the Jewish diaspora is essentially a modern invention. He accounts for the appearance of millions of Jews around the Mediterranean and elsewhere as something that came about primarily through the religious conversion of local people, saying that Judaism, contrary to popular opinion, was very much a "converting religion" in former times. He holds that mass conversions were first brought about by the Hasmoneans under the influence of Hellenism, and continued until Christianity rose to dominance in the fourth century CE.[18]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TheInventionoftheJewish_People

Genetic markers cannot determine Jewish descent

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4301023/

1 point

Just as Nom is irrationally prepossessed with Bronto it would appear that whatever the depth of his psychosis may be or the state of his declared morality, he sure has you caught up in the tangled web of his runaway insanity.

I feel it would be best if the regular members of this site abandoned the false premise of debating and concentrated exclusively on calling each other nasty names just like a bunch of kids from junior school.

Dermot(5796) Clarified
1 point

Good to see you’re still here long time no see

I don’t nor ever have backed down to bullies this viper has never even attempted debate , Andy last year promised he would rid the site of scum like this creature but backed down.

When I first joined here there were some terrific debaters and the site was regarded as a very good site for such . People like this scum bag deserved to be called out on their BS pity it cannot be face to face as the matter would be settled in 10 seconds with Burrito waking up with a crowd around him

Miocene(655) Clarified
1 point

Well, that's fine, continue to give him a good thrashing.

Whilst he is a thicko of the 1st order, he has a lot of animal cunning and is a past master at introducing 'red herrings/straw-man arguments' into any discussion and has his opponent defensively contesting a subject of his choice that usually has nothing to do with the original thread.

Good luck.