CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:22
Arguments:27
Total Votes:24
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 The US should split up (17)

Debate Creator

Slavedevice(1300) pic



The US should split up

There would be much less violence if the country (which is a huge country) would split into 3 parts - left, right, and moderate.
Add New Argument
2 points

There would be much less violence if the country (which is a huge country) would split into 3 parts - left, right, and moderate

Hello S:

Cool.. Libs, of course, would get California, Oregon and Washington, plus all the north eastern states. I don't really care how you wanna divide up the rest..

You could make Bumfuk, Ok one capital, and Possom Trot, Al the other..

Bwa, ha ha ha ha ha.

excon

Amarel(5562) Disputed
0 points

The red counties in those states wouldn't accept it. You would have to divvy up by county and redraw state lines.

Supporting Evidence: Election map (brilliantmaps.com)
excon(15375) Disputed
1 point

You would have to divvy up by county and redraw state lines.

Hello A:

Huh??? That would mean we'd pretty much be living together, which kinda defeats the purpose..

excon

Hootie(429) Disputed
1 point

The red counties in those states wouldn't accept it.

I've noticed that most of the things you write involve you telling us what somebody else thinks, wants, or would accept. Always without ever asking them first. Very stupid.

CrotchRocket(63) Disputed
0 points

Cool.. Libs, of course, would get California, Oregon and Washington, plus all the north eastern states.

You'd soon be living in a copless, gunless world. Don't bend over to grab the soap.

Hootie(429) Disputed
1 point

You'd soon be living in a copless, gunless world

And a crimeless world, since the resources would be shared more equally and poverty would be greatly reduced.

excon(15375) Disputed
1 point

You'd soon be living in a copless, gunless world.

Hello C:

Uhhh, Dude. Isn't that the objective???

excon

2 points

That was tried a while back. The ones who wanted the break-up lost. Some tried it again on Jan. 6th ... they lost also.

DrChamberlin(145) Clarified
0 points

Can someone record this as verifiably proof that AlofRi barely knows anything about US history?

excon(15375) Disputed
2 points

Can someone record this as verifiably proof that AlofRi barely knows anything about US history?

Hello Dr:

Sooo, you don't know about the Civil War either, or how it happened, or how it turned out.. Cain't help that.. And, you got the nuts to challenge one of our top contributors and truth tellers on this site..

DUDE!

excon

PS> Plus, if you're gonna criticize someone for not knowing shit, I'd use proper English to do it..

DUDE!

1 point

All that has to happen is for the existing and well established racial, political and sectarian partition lines to be officially recognised and the map of the U.S.A., rehashed showing the two, or perhaps three separate newly formed nations.

The romantic nonsense of a great big melting pot is for story time at The Mickey Mouse Club.

In case the politicians haven't noticed the country is already divided into very distinct religious, nationalist and racial ethnicities.

The last I looked, which was some time back, the national debt was around 21 trillion dollars, and rapidly increasing within the cocid-19 pandemic.

The Reds vs the Blues, the Blacks vs the Whites, the Asians vs everyone, the Hillys vs the Billys.

We have the likes of A.O.C., whose latest vomiting session was to inform us that climate change is, WAIT FOR IT, YES YOU GOT IT, R-A-Y-C-I-S-T.

Yes sirree bob, mass unregulated immigration has brought America to it knees politically and financially.

MAN,MAN OH MAN.

We do have an issue here. If the US were to split up into it's own districts, or counties, especially separated on party lines. Then I believe that the republican, or otherwise more stable red states would fare far better than the democrat ran states.

Crime of all kinds would possibly run rampant in these democrat run states, which would either force them to either become almost entirely authoritarian, or be stuck with the crime as is.

excon(15375) Disputed
2 points

Then I believe that the republican, or otherwise more stable red states would fare far better than the democrat ran states.

Hello Dr:

Lemme see.. We got your Democratic states, who're VERY VERY rich, but don't know what they're doing, and then we got your right wing states who're VERY VERY poor, but they know what's happening..

DUDE!!!!

excon

DrChamberlin(145) Clarified
1 point

Rich and poor means very little when you're not only unwilling to stop violent crime in your streets, but you're willing to support it as your city burns.

-

Blue states/cities don't have a finance problem. It's a crime problem, and it's one that they allow to happen strangely enough.

Don’t forget a third part for moderates. I say west coast for extreme left, Texas and maybe the rest of the south (except Florida?) for white Christian nationalists. Then the rest of the country moderate. Don’t forget, there’s some Canadians that want in on this resectioning