CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy.
If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
Arguments with the highest score are displayed first.
Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument.
To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
To vote for an argument, use these icons:
You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument.
Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change.
Yes, you can change your vote.
Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account.
All scores are updated in real-time.
To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument.
If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.
You can share this debate in three different ways:
#1
#2
#3
Paste this URL into an email or IM:
Click here to send this debate via your default email application.
Click here to login and CreateDebate will send an email for you.
The agnostic is the most rational stance to hold. Is the agnostic stance most logical?
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
Being that the existence of God hasn't been proven or disproven, The most logical position to be in as agnostic.
That's purely agnostic by the way. .
Really as simple as can be.
Let me know if I missed something.
For clarity or questions, Please send a message or comment prior to accepting debate.
The agnostic position rationalizes that currently there is evidence or a fact concerning the existence of God.
The fact is that the reality of a god is inconclusive. Their position totally sways on evidence alone. That is the basis of the scientific method, empirical data , research and etc.
All other positions that take a belief in the positive or negative are less rational based on the previous mentioned fact regarding the agnostic role.
That is the summary and size of it. That'll do for now.
I completely agree with you and have considered myself agnostic for several decades now.
That said, in agnosticism there is a danger to assume that, because the question of God can't be answered definitively one way or another, that must therefore mean the probabilities are equal. That isn't the case. In particular, organised religions are so specific in their beliefs that it automatically minimises the probability they can be correct.
I am crazy in love, with Yeshua...............................................................................................................................
Fine. Allah can kiss my fucking lilly white rosy cheeked, mother fucking ass, bitch. How does that, suit the pallet?
Allah just got in touch and said heโs willing to let you suck his rod but only if Satan can butt fuck you at the same time ......god can watch ๐ช๐จ๐จ๐จ๐จ๐๐
Hypocrite, if they can slander Yeshua, I can go after Allah. You just exposed you lies and hypocisy, and yes, I do have the right to criticise religigious ideas, if other people do, but I am willing to be respectful, if you are.
Hypocrite, if they can slander Yeshua, I can go after Allah.
You just demanded people speak about Yeshua with respect so obviously you are the hypocrite!!! You are not willing to treat other people's beliefs with the same respect you demand for your own!!
All you are good for is making sandwiches. Fuck off you nasty bitch and learn to love thy neighbor.
If you you can say nasty stuff about Yeshua, O can say nasty stuff about Allah.
And if you can say nasty stuff about Allah, then I can call Yeshua a stupid little bitch. You have no right to demand people respect Yeshua because you don't respect anybody else's beliefs. So go fuck yourself.
Yes I do have the right because if you are going to speak to me, you are going to respect Yeshua, not curse Him, and Yeshua is Risen Lord and God, in Human Flesh, so democracy can kiss my ass, and that was not a sin, because ass is in the KJV Bible sweetheart, please check it out.
When you are ready to use more respectful language about Yeshua, then I will speak to, you. Good day, dear Clown.
Translation from pretend โChristian โ to english .......The hideous dog ๐ถ Dana has no valid answer so runs ๐โโ๏ธ ๐โโ๏ธ ๐โโ๏ธ
If you are going to attack Yeshua, I have not a fucking thing to say, to say to tu punta culo.
Hey chill bitch I only bear a message from Allah he wants to know when you want him to butt fuck your bitch ass and when can his buddy Satan put his fiery dick in your mouth ?
God is waiting on the show he even bought popcorn ๐ฟ ๐โบ๏ธ
For those confused about fictitious characters being real like the leprechaun or unicorn or superman, that's all been proven to have been made up. Doesn't compare to the inconclusive existence of God. So therefore the most rationality of anything concerns the most science and evidence. The most evidence we have to date over anything is the inconclusive nature of existence for a god. That's where the agnostic view comes into play
For those confused about fictitious characters being real like the leprechaun or unicorn or superman, that's all been proven to have been made up.
No it hasn't. You can't prove these things don't exist and hence you can't prove anybody made them up. It's the exact same thing with God.
Doesn't compare to the inconclusive existence of God.
Are you stupid? You are literally making decisions about fantasy concepts based solely on what your personal bias is towards those concepts. Leprechauns have been "proven to be made up", but God simply has an "inconclusive existence". I mean, just look at the vast difference in language you are using to describe two different fantasy beings which have an identical lack of evidence supporting them.
"No it hasn't. You can't prove these things don't exist and hence you can't prove anybody made them up. It's the exact same thing with God."
Oh excuse me. What are the origins of these made up characters, the unicorn, superman and leprechaun?
"Are you stupid?"
Am I stupid to what ?
"You are literally making decisions about fantasy concepts based solely on what your personal bias is towards those concepts. Leprechauns have been "proven to be made up", but God simply has an "inconclusive existence". I mean, just look at the vast difference in language you are using to describe two different fantasy beings which have an identical lack of evidence supporting them."
What's the evidence that they're fantastical? See, just pay attention to the words you're using. If there is no evidence for or against what we're talking about here, it's inconclusive. Do you follow what I'm saying?
But you use the word fantasy. In order to identify something as fantasy, there's evidence of it being such. How else do you know it is?
That's what I said from the beginning, made up unlike God unless you or anybody has proof otherwise.
Oh excuse me. What are the origins of these made up characters, the unicorn, superman and leprechaun?
You've asserted the answer to your own question within the question you contemptibly empty-headed dolt. If you are going to answer your own questions then what do you need me for? You cannot PROVE that any of your named characters were "made up". You can only prove that people have written about them in a fictional setting.
Where did those people that wrote about these characters in a fictional setting get them from?
This is quite laughable. It's obvious to try and lump everything together to try to make it all ridiculous. But we have to be honest with this information here. You can't know to call something fantasy and be correct without proof of it being so.
This is why agnostics exist. There's no proof of God being real nor proof that this is fantasy.
There's certainly a lot to be said for 'hedging your bets' or 'leaving all options open' but in the case of religion one should either believe emphatically in the existence of their God or unashamedly reject the presence of some omnipotent, supernatural creature.
If one takes the time to dispassionately research the available evidence to establish or shun the reality of a God one must come to the only logical conclusion that there ??????????????????????????.
i suppose ur agnostic about unicorns and leprechauns too. ffs.
Can you prove unicorns and leprechauns don't exist you retarded bitch? Maybe in your world we reject things we don't like the sound of without any supporting evidence. Not in mine.
i actually quite like the sound of unicorns and leprechauns. however, i have no use for suspending disbelief in every baseless and bizarre notion that someone else cooks up in their imagination. i find definitive opinions overwhelmingly more useful than agnostic indeterminacy. its not like u practice ur agnosticism anyways; it's just a desperate veneer you maintain for urself to as a feeble assurance against ur transparently low self-esteem.
It's a rational stance, and a logical one, but that doesn't qualify it for the 'most' anything. People can realize there is no hard evidence to prove or disprove God and still believe in Him or not. I suppose it depends in the end on what you want to believe.
People can realize there is no hard evidence to prove or disprove God and still believe in Him or not.
That is true but it is also misleading because one could make the exact same argument about any invention of the human mind. If I wrote a serious book arguing that there was a secret intelligent banana who meticulously planned every major world event there would be no hard evidence to prove or disprove it, and you would be equally free to either believe it or not believe it. But CLEARLY that story has come from my own imagination.