CreateDebate


Debate Info

26
54
Yes, they are No, they are legit
Debate Score:80
Arguments:51
Total Votes:113
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes, they are (24)
 
 No, they are legit (27)

Debate Creator

Thewayitis(4071) pic



The cries of losers

  Atheist use words like: logical fallacy, critical thinking, pseudo-problem of logic, a matter of proper authorities, logical coherency, uses incorrect authorities, debating has rules, equivocation, logical errors, anecdotal, Irreducible Complexity, converse error, and sophistry. 

 

These are taken from religious debates here on CreateDebate.

Yes, they are

Side Score: 26
VS.

No, they are legit

Side Score: 54

There is no formal proof that God does not exist. So when atheists talk as though they have science on their side, I laugh. On the other hand, religion doesn't have a formal proof either. So I guess that the logical option is to become an agnostic. Anything else is just a logical fallacy. If you do some critical thinking, you will see that you arrive at my conclusion. Anything else is just full of logical errors, lacks logical coherency, and is usually anecdotal. I mean, it is just sophistry and if I knew how else to incorporate the remaining words, I would ;)

Side: Yes, they are
Akulakhan(2985) Disputed
1 point

Well, consider this. If I stated there was a magical space panda, you could not find evidence against it. In fact, the debates over it's existence would go exactly the same as any religious debate. A lack of evidence against something does not infer that something is likely, or even realistic.

Side: No, they are legit
Thewayitis(4071) Disputed
1 point

You used the word infer to argue whether these types of words are legit and by doing so only proves one has no argument.

Side: Yes, they are

"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction."

Albert Einstein

Side: Yes, they are

Now quotes from Einstein are getting down-voted, this person must be way smarter person than a genius.

Side: Yes, they are
ricedaragh(2494) Disputed
1 point

This Quote would be a fitting reference if in the simplicity of your arguments you actually approached even a modest level of profundity. But Atheist bashing is not profound.

I can see through your thin veil of moral superiority to the darkness that ails you, you boast of being a strong Christian but fall on the fundamentals such as humility, understanding and peace. Is it not Jesus that said let he who is without sin cast the first stone? The benefit of being an Atheist is that to us sin is a meme, one fostered by ancient men as a primitive judicial system.

You seem to me to be one of the Christians that turns a blind eye to the teachings and also the contradictions in order to function as both a Christian and a sinner.

Side: No, they are legit
3 points

There's nothing absurd about not believing in God. It's just not choosing to subscribe to the rambles of a minister.

Side: No, they are legit
2 points

Did your pride get hurt with all the times you've been shot down recently?

It sure does seem like it. You're getting desperate and stupid.

Call it what you want, but as long as it makes sense, it's legitimate.

Side: No, they are legit
Thewayitis(4071) Disputed
0 points

Had a bad day and instead of kicking the dog, I decided to go a step a below and kick an atheist.

Side: Yes, they are
Warlin(1213) Disputed
2 points

Had a bad day and instead of kicking the dog, I decided to go a step a below and kick an atheist.

Devaluing your fellow man? Is that what Jesus would want you to do? You should be ashamed of yourself; you're a terrible Christian.

Side: No, they are legit
1 point

Without a commitment to logic and basic rules of debate, it becomes a free for all with no need for coherency. Words like those you listed describe concepts that are either prominent tools for misleading or general rules for constructing an argument. It's all a part of following the rules to have a cogent argument that must follow from the premises.

Side: No, they are legit
Thewayitis(4071) Disputed
1 point

"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough."

Albert Einstein

Side: Yes, they are
aveskde(1935) Disputed
1 point

"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough."

Albert Einstein

Not really pertinent to the subject. We are discussing a complicated thing.

Side: No, they are legit
0 points

well everyone beleaves on whatever they want! everone has their own opinion

Side: No, they are legit