The dropping of the first Atomic bomb was justifyed.
That is, I mean the atomic bomb dropped by America on Jpaan after Pearl harbour. Remember, it ended the war and Hilter was on teh verge of discovering atomic bombs. How messed up the world woul be if Hilter got Nuclear weapons. Also, America siad there was no such thing as radiation siclness afterwards... DISCUSS!
Justified
Side Score: 4
|
 |
NO WAY YOU FREAK!!!!
Side Score: 9
|
|
|
|
|
1
point
0
points
This side looked lonely, so... Sure, why not? The Japanese had no intentions of surrendering. Moreover, a full scale invasion would likely have cost more lives than the first bomb. The second, I'm not so sure. They didn't give the Japanese adequate time to respond. Side: Justified
1
point
1
point
0
points
Yes it is wrong. But i do understand the reasoning behind it. This war depended upon life or death of who civilizations. Even though I am not a fan of war nor nuclear weapons it, can help defend us. The negatives is that generations to come suffer from mutated gene diseases. Side: Justified
|
1
point
1
point
No...it is never acceptable to kill civilians as an act of war...To say dropping that bomb was justified, would be to say, that the mass murder the North Vietnamies committed against civilians during the Vietnam war was justified. ...IT IS NEVER ACCEPTABLE TO KILL CIVILIANS AS AN ACT OF WAR! Side: NO WAY YOU FREAK!!!!
It can not be justified, because the atomic bomb took the lives of millions of people, many have lost their parents, their children and relatives. Radiation resulting from the bombing even be passed on next generations. Thousands of people died from radiation sickness and other genetic mutations. Side: NO WAY YOU FREAK!!!!
1
point
|
