The hypocrisy from Dems is amazing. No restriction abortions are ok to them. DEPLORABLE!
|
1
point
1
point
Why not once in your life try being honest with what is going on. Hillary called half of Trumps supporters all those names. Guess what? She has no clue if any of these people she insulted are what she claims. HOW COULD SHE KNOW? I would agree that truly phobic people are lacking compassion for many Americans. The worst of the offenders are Democrats who have NO COMPASSION for even viable unborn Babies. I guess we should name them UnbornBabyphobic. None of the Conservatives or Christians I have ever known have shown any of those phobias. None of the Conservative politicians I have ever followed have shown any of those phobias. We have compassion and care for all Americans. That does not mean we must support Gay marriage, or be labeled homophobes. That does not mean support abortions or be labeled haters of women. Why don't you try being honest for once on this debate site and admit that Democrats use these labels purely for politcal purposes. They have labeled people on the Right for decades, trying to condition voters to believe the lies. Of course there are racists and phobics in this nation. They reside in both parties and has nothing to do with the party. I think any person who supports no restriction abortions is deplorable, along with many other names. It is no guess on my part. I KNOW that the Democrat party supports no restriction abortions in at least nine states. So it is a FACT (NOT GUESSING) that the people who vote for these radical pro abortion politicians DO support no restriction abortions! No difference if I voted for an open KKK member. If I voted for him, and claimed to not be personally racist, because I am not a one issue voter, would you buy that garbage excuse? No, I would be supporting racism if I knowingly voted for a KKK member. There are some issues that supercede all other issues and should never be supported with our vote. I understand that so many on this site will deny these facts and the reason why I ban many of them. I wil not waste time debating deceptive people. I have given my personal beliefs on abortions many many times. I support life of mother abortions only for the fact it would be better to save one life then lose two lives. If there has to be the hideous choice of which life will survive, I would leave that choice to the mother and doctor. We have pills today that will prevent conception a couple days after a rape. Ask yourself why Democrats seldom share this knowledge on our media so that women would never get pregnant from a rape. The reason they seldom educate the public to this information is because they love using the rape excuse to scare women and keep the vast majority of birth control abortions, for any reason, legal. If the woman refuses to go to the doctor to prevent conception, it is not the Baby's fault. That innocent human life does not care who his father is. The value of that little life is no less than any innocent human life. There are millions of parents waiting for newborn babies to adopt if the mother does not want the baby. The GOP has a compromise Bill with a 20 week abortion limit (unless extreme cases in later term). Democrats stop them every time! There is not one unborn life at any stage for any reason that Democrats are willing to protect. They are tied to the abortion lobby hook line and sinker. THEY ARE DEPLORABLE! I'm not guessing if they are deplorable. I know for a fact that they support the deplorable act. Do you honestly think a baby a few weeks from birth is any less human than after traveling down the birth canal? Oh, but for Democrats, all they had to do is get five Justices on the courts to side with aborting these innocent lives, and then claim it is the law of the land so therefore is not deplorable. LOL, we all know in our hearts what we are supporting, but the deceptive ones simply deny the truth. It was legal to kill Jews in Germany but it was still deplorable. Just because the leaders or activist justices of a nation are deplorable, does not make it ok. 1
point
1
point
No difference if I voted for an open KKK member. If I voted for him, and claimed to not be personally racist, because I am not a one issue voter, would you buy that garbage excuse? No, I would be supporting racism if I knowingly voted for a KKK member. I would be open to you making the argument that the vote is justifiable as long as it was persuasive, though, regardless of whether it was persuasive, it would still be a vote supporting racism. 1
point
Maybe you can try and explain your own abortion position - something you abandoned long ago... 1
point
1
point
You are either a deceptive liar to say that the Democrat party does not support limitless abortions, or you are very ignorant to the facts. Here is a site once again showing each state's abortion laws..... I have many times given sites showing which states are no restriction abortions. I have many times given sites explaining when Democrats prevented the GOP 20 week compromise (unless for later term extreme cases). They have tried to pass the compromise in Texas and they have tried to get it passed in our Congress. DEMOCRATS ALWAYS STOP THE BILL EVEN THOUGH THE GOP HAVE THE EXTREME CASE EXCEPTIONS! The Democrat party will never be honest and say they support no restriction abortions, they just make sure no law is ever passed to prevent it. No matter what bill the GOP put forward, the Democrt party always finds something wrong with it to veto it. I don't know about you, but if I had a chance to make infanticide illegal, I would get together with the GOP to make it happen. What other issue attached to any bill could possibly supercede legal infanticide. Democrats will never compromise. Abortion is big money for their elections from pro abortion lobbies. 2
points
You are either a deceptive liar to say that the Democrat party does not support limitless abortions, or you are very ignorant to the facts. Do you normally insult people the first time you talk to them? Here is a site once again showing each state's abortion laws..... http://dailysignal.com/2015/05/08/ That article dishonestly uses the phrase "no limit". According to the Guttmacher Institute, all of the states that are listed in the Kazier Institute Map as having no limit, only allow for abortions for the protection of the mother's life and health. The "no limit" is referring only to time, but phrases it in such a way that it leads people such as yourself to think those states have absolutely no regulations on late term abortions, which simply isn't the case. I have many times given sites showing which states are no restriction abortions. I have many times given sites explaining when Democrats prevented the GOP 20 week compromise (unless for later term extreme cases). Not to me you haven't. So far as the Democrats preventing bills, can you provide any that were amendment free? Most of the votes on abortion related bills I have seen involved tooooons of extra amendments added on there regarding other topics that they knew the Democrats wouldn't vote for. Seems dishonest of them to me. The Democrat party will never be honest and say they support no restriction abortions, they just make sure no law is ever passed to prevent it. No matter what bill the GOP put forward, the Democrt party always finds something wrong with it to veto it. Can you provide any examples of one of the bills that you think should not have been vetoed? The specific bill number I mean, so I can look up the exact wording. What other issue attached to any bill could possibly supercede legal infanticide. Democrats will never compromise. But see that right there is the point. Compromise would be having them vote on a bill purely about abortion. Trying to force them to vote on a bill filled with tons of other riders is the exact opposite of compromise, it's attempted extortion. You should be calling for the Republican Party to put out a riderless bill only dealing with later term abortions and nothing else. At that point if the Democratic Party refused to pass it, it would actually mean they, in effect, support "limitless" (in terms of time) abortions. Abortion is big money for their elections from pro abortion lobbies. https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/ Actually, it isn't. That's barely over a million dollars. Exon Mobil alone has 5 times that in contributions. https://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/ Abortion is actually one of the smallest money big ticket issues. 1
point
1
point
WOW, you ask how does it affect me when someone takes an innocent life? Think about what you just said. Has your conscience been so hardened in this sick no fault me me culture? We are talking about no restriction abortions for babies who could be days from birth and you ask how does killing that child affect me? Gee, I guess it affects me the same way it affects you when you see some parent kill their child. So it doesn't bother you when some parent kills their two year old child? That unborn baby a few weeks from traveling down the birth canal is NO LESS HUMAN then that two year old. It's sick we have a Democrat party that has become so extreme and so tied to the abortion lobby. It's even more sick that 50% of Americans would vote for these extremists. Now do what all pro abortion people do and say that these late term abortions happen very seldom. So tell me, how many two year old children get killed by parents each year? Would it bother you if only one two year old child was killed each year or would you excuse it away by saying it does not happen very often? 0
points
|
