I agree with what you say, but I hate that you felt the need to take Christ's name in vain to do so.

Imagine if you said "Nigger" I'm sick of all these Special Snowflakes. There would be an outcry from all the Leftist Bigots on this site. But as long as you are demeaning Christianity, it is all fine with them.

I would hope that someday, people might have respect for Christian's and their faith, and quit using our Lord's name as a swear word.

I can self identify as whatever I want. If I want to be a black rockstar what's it to you?

2 genders and theres only a couple sexualitys, gay bi and straight, or you can do trans if you have changed your genitals. Otherwise you're a sad man with certain kinks. Your kinks dont make a gender

You make a vaid point. That sounds like straight to me, too.

But hey, whether there are 70+ sexualities, or just 2, you're still not getting any action. Natural selection at work.

The idea that there are 70+ sexualities is absurd.

There are infinite genders. Why is that absurd?

Gynesexual- being primarily sexually, romantically and/or emotionally attracted to some woman, females, and/or femininity."

This, to me, is still straight!!! How is this it's own sexuality? It's just a preference. And as for the attraction towards femininity, that could also fall under bisexuality. Which is a normal sexuality.

This is the one that I am. I'm the other 70 as well.

The idea that everything needs labels is absurd, but the idea of sexualities makes sense--every human is different. People will always have clashing experiences and opinions, it's the beauty of diversity. Being straight could be a matter of romantic attraction, or a matter of sexual desire. One may outweigh the other, or they may be equal--that doesn't make a person any less straight, it just means they experience their attraction in a different form than others. The 70+ sexuality idea is based off of this diversity, and while I admit it may sound "ridiculous" and "absurd" to some, it's only a form of compensating for the uniquity of each individual living being to reside on this planet. It's the same idea of gender--even if you are cisgender, that doesn't necessarily mean you'll fall into stereotypes. Stereotypes will always be stereotypes, and that's not going to change--it's a societal fault. With stereotypes comes a need to fit in, and fitting in normally means following new stereotypes under new labels to feel comfortable. There are not enough labels to fit every single person on our planet--70+ sexualities is just the beginning of a sea of individuality.

The idea that everything needs labels is absurd, but the idea of sexualities makes sense--every human is different. People will always have clashing experiences and opinions, it's the beauty of diversity. Being straight could be a matter of romantic attraction, or a matter of sexual desire. One may outweigh the other, or they may be equal--that doesn't make a person any less straight, it just means they experience their attraction in a different form than others. The 70+ sexuality idea is based off of this diversity, and while I admit it may sound "ridiculous" and "absurd" to some, it's only a form of compensating for the uniquity of each individual living being to reside on this planet. It's the same idea of gender--even if you are cisgender, that doesn't necessarily mean you'll fall into stereotypes. Stereotypes will always be stereotypes, and that's not going to change--it's a societal fault. With stereotypes comes a need to fit in, and fitting in normally means following new stereotypes under new labels to feel comfortable. There are not enough labels to fit every single person on our planet--70+ sexualities is just the beginning of a sea of individuality.