CreateDebate


Debate Info

4
4
Clear as day Are not hiding it
Debate Score:8
Arguments:16
Total Votes:9
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Clear as day (4)
 
 Are not hiding it (5)

Debate Creator

TimCast(429) pic



The left cool with having guns, unless it's you

Clear as day

Side Score: 4
VS.

Are not hiding it

Side Score: 4
1 point

I am personally in favor of having guns so that we can shoot the police while defunding them. I believe Antifa and BLM should be armed with military grade weapons and the police should be disarmed.

Side: Clear as day
1 point

I am personally in favor of having guns also. Just like we have for many years. I am NOT in favor of allowing military-grade weapons as "toys" for every Tom, Dick and hairy dickhead that wants to spray bullets. I WANT the 2nd Amendment .... adjusted to fit these modern times! An AR-15 is NOT a musket, as was the prime weapon at the time the Second was envisioned.

No, NO militant group should be allowed to outgun the normal "peacekeepers and lawmen". Many countries allow their people to own guns, NONE of them have the problems WE have today. If we have THAT MUCH mental illness, as the NRA seems to imagine, we need STRONGER restrictions than the original Amendment requires ... until we find our SANITY!

I have owned guns since I was a teen. I was a proud NRA member for many years .... until they contracted the "mental illness" of today. Hopefully, we'll find a cure someday and the NRA will again get back to basic gun safety, which was their prime directive when I was a member.

Side: Clear as day
BurritoLunch(4910) Clarified
1 point

Hopefully, we'll find a cure someday and the NRA will again get back to basic gun safety, which was their prime directive when I was a member.

One thing I've learned in life. As heartbreaking as it sometimes is, you can only ever go forward. Never back.

Side: Clear as day
AlofRI(3126) Clarified
2 points

That WOULD be forward. ;-)

Side: Clear as day
Dermot(5688) Clarified
0 points

As heartbreaking as it sometimes is, you can only ever go forward. Never back.

I thought you had a time machine ? 不不不不不不不

Side: Clear as day
-1 points

Question. Are there links to aforementioned testimony that the man killed was, in fact, carrying a rifle? Is there alternate photographic evidence? What I see in the photo is one arm in a position that yes, may indicate he is pointing a Kalashnikov style rifle in a way that is threatening. It may also be he was holding it at low ready, which does not excuse his actions and does not necessarily condemn the accused driver. It may also have been a black blur in the image. To be clear, I will not argue that the accused driver doesn't have every right to defend his life, nor will I argue that this level of hypocrisy is something I put past the established far left. However, before I can make a fair judgement, I need to see further evidence that he was, in fact, armed.

Side: Are not hiding it