CreateDebate


Debate Info

59
41
True. Wait..., I'm, uh, never mind
Debate Score:100
Arguments:61
Total Votes:105
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 True. (25)
 
 Wait..., I'm, uh, never mind (32)

Debate Creator

joecavalry(39261) pic



The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist.

True.

Side Score: 59
VS.

Wait..., I'm, uh, never mind

Side Score: 41

Now let's find out who here is a radical ;)

Side: True.
4 points

Proper Terrorists that have been proven to be guilty fine take em out, the problem is a government can label anyone a terrorist which would be where the problem arises, the only other problem is that by killing territorists you could be creating martyrs for their cause.

Side: True.
4 points

What would you do with live one anyway :)

Side: True.
4 points

Especially when the terrorists are your own governmental leaders, or is that called something else?

Side: True.
4 points

Technically speaking. They are called Terrorist because they only seek to spread terror.

Terrorists is different from Rebels

Terrorists are like Bandits with well funded weapons

Side: True.
1 point

It's the other way around.

Side: Wait..., I'm, uh, never mind
4 points

Allah though to be fair even bad terrorists make good dead terrorists too.

Allah Give You A Holla
Side: True.

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

Side: Wait..., I'm, uh, never mind
Casimir(1) Disputed
5 points

Islamists do not fight for their freedom. They fight for removing freedoms from all human kind.

Side: True.
1 point

How do we determine what freedom they wish to pursue? They may want revenge and the feeling of liberation to enter their mind. People fight for many reasons and freedoms can be depicted many ways. Also when you say "Islamists" you must realize that all Islamic people arent terrorists. Anybody can be a terrorist. The boston marathon suspects were Russian the last time I checked.

Side: Wait..., I'm, uh, never mind
joecavalry(39261) Clarified
4 points

Freedom fighters do not blow up marathon runners ;)

Side: True.
1 point

Freedom fighters do not blow up marathon runners ;)

Yes, they bomb whole cities :))

Side: Wait..., I'm, uh, never mind

The truth of this statement can only be truly appreciated when you understand how unfair it is that a government can never be labelled the terrorist organisation in a war.

Side: Wait..., I'm, uh, never mind

Please do not leave the country. The FBI will be contacting you shortly ;)

Side: Wait..., I'm, uh, never mind

Governments do not blow up marathon runners ;)

Side: Wait..., I'm, uh, never mind

Please do not leave the country. The FBI will be contacting you shortly ;)

Side: Wait..., I'm, uh, never mind
1 point

Nooo... Ahhhh for gods sake. No you can't just say " oh he killed people, and that was bad. Now we'll do something good. And kill them instead." How stupid!

An eye for an eye and we shall all be blind. Never heard that?

Side: Wait..., I'm, uh, never mind

It raises the question do we come after the terrorist or make it okay for people like the terrorists to do what they did again?

Side: Wait..., I'm, uh, never mind
1 point

I only believe in the death penalty if there is a threat to life or civil liberties.

Side: Wait..., I'm, uh, never mind
4 points

That it the point of terrorism. They way to cause terror by killing people. I dont know if they deserve the death penalty though.

Side: True.
Sitara(11082) Clarified
4 points

I prefer not to kill, but if life or civil liberties are in danger, it is on.

Side: True.
Chuz-Life(496) Disputed
4 points

I only believe in the death penalty if there is a threat to life or civil liberties.

Abortions take the lives of the children killed and abortions (by killing them) deny those children their lives and civil liberties.

But you don't see that as a violation of the child killed at all?

Amazing.

Side: True.
1 point

once again "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter"

let us look at Syria... to Assad the Rebels are terrorists and to the west they are freedom fighters. So if the only good terrorist is a dead one the west should go give Assad a big hug and send him lots of weapons and send their own armies to kill the "terrorists".

But the Free Syrian Army is considered (on the whole) as a force for freedom and therefore not a terrorist organisation. that is by the west. Perhaps its better for us to look at the Free Syrian Army as our terrorists, not a view we want to embrace, but that is basically who they are.

so if you support Freedom in Syria then you cannot agree with the statement that "The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist"

Side: Wait..., I'm, uh, never mind
Nox0(1393) Disputed
5 points

In Syria are no freedom fighters. It's dictator vs. Islamist terrorists so there are both sides bad.

Side: True.
Julius(201) Clarified
5 points

Damnit, you beat me to my own argument! .

Side: True.

The Syrian rebels are targeting Assad's military, not civilians.

They are Freedom Fighters, not terrorists.

Assad's army is targeting civilians.

They are terrorists.

;)

Side: Wait..., I'm, uh, never mind
1 point

What's a terroist? The Syrian goverment is classifing the rebels as terrosits, and should they be dead?

Though, being dead would be better than G. bay....

Side: Wait..., I'm, uh, never mind
1 point

John Brown was hanged for his acts of terrorism.

His crime was that the raided an armory and tried to wage a civil war to free American slaves.

I don't agree that he should have been executed for that crime.

Side: Wait..., I'm, uh, never mind