CreateDebate


Debate Info

2
0
Should be had Shouldn't be had
Debate Score:2
Arguments:2
Total Votes:2
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Should be had (2)

Debate Creator

Akulakhan(2985) pic



The right to abort a fetus based on it's genetic faults.

In the not so distant future, scientists will be able to determine what genetic faults one's fetus will have come birth or later in life.

Should it be the right of the mother or father to abort such a fetus, knowing these faults, even at a late stage of pregnancy?

Or should nature take it's place?

Should be had

Side Score: 2
VS.

Shouldn't be had

Side Score: 0
1 point

It should be a right, by the mother, to terminate her pregnancy at any stage, even late, if the consequences of the genetic makeup of a fetus will cause that fetus to live a crippling or painful life.

Side: Should be had
1 point

Further education and realizations of the issues with making abortion illegal show why government should have nothing to do with abortion.

Same goes with everything else.

As much as people have a moral issue with something, it is not moral for them to force their beliefs onto everyone else via government. If their morality is so great, they would be able to convince everyone else to do it through very good argument and reasoning.

Side: Should be had
No arguments found. Add one!