CreateDebate


Debate Info

1
3
Support Oppose
Debate Score:4
Arguments:10
Total Votes:8
Ended:04/24/13
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Support (3)
 
 Oppose (3)

Debate Creator

lupusFati(790) pic



This debate has ended. You can no longer add arguments or vote in this debate.

Theory: The Weak should serve the Strong.

The idea behind the concept being those who are weaker in power should serve those who are stronger.  Whether that power comes from politics, knowledge, what have you is irrelevant; they need only be the superior of the two in some way.

I will refrain from stating my own opinions on the matter, but I am curious as to who supports this and who opposes this, and for what reason.  There is no wrong answer.

Support

Side Score: 1
VS.

Oppose

Side Score: 3
Winning Side!

Yes. In a way that is already the case. The weak in nature serve the strong in nature by providing the strong with nutrition. The weak in society serve the strong by literally working for them. In that scenario the strong are business owners while the weak are impoverished peasants and less rich people who need jobs.

If you look at it as serving the stronger you will find it to be evil, but if you look at it as maybe being led by people with power then it comes off as better.

Side: Support
lupusFati(790) Clarified
2 points

I attempted to word it neutrally. Perhaps I did not do a good enough job, but it got the point across. How one justifies the statement is up to their interpretation.

Side: Support
Quocalimar(6470) Clarified
1 point

It was okay. My argument was just explaining how it could go either way and how the people on my opposition could have an argument against me, and how I also could have an argument against them.

Side: Support

The weak and the strong should NOT interact. Interaction would lead to either the weak leeching off the strong or the strong enslaving the weak.

Am I going to get banned now ;)

Side: Oppose
lupusFati(790) Clarified
1 point

No. I feel you actually understood the question. I don't mean strong as in physical. I mean strong in any area that gives one a significant edge over others.

Side: Support
0 points

There are many other factors to one's survival ability including social skills (charisma) and pure intellect (IQ) strength alone is a pointless, animalistic way to determine hierarchy.

Side: Oppose
lupusFati(790) Disputed
0 points

Why am I not surprised that you have missed the point entirely.

This is not a survival debate. Please stay on topic.

And I highly suggest you actually read the body, not just the topic.

Side: Support
Rogue Rascal(9480) Disputed Banned
0 points

Charisma and IQ are highly important in one's survival as a means of competing with others of their species. Strength is only one of many factors.

Side: Oppose