@Sv3rige. So I think we have agreement about Factory Farms being an illegitimate enterprise, do you agree with that? Now, as for laws, I certainly in no way speak for Vegans as a group, in my view, what should be illegal is Factory Farming and obvious/blatant wicked mass torture/torment slaughterhouses. I certainly do not think that hunting and fishing should be illegal. Also, I don't think that other types of farming where the animals are not being tortured 24/7 should be illegal although I think there should be higher standards for the animals life quality while alive and the way that they are killed should be in as least amount of pain as is feasible (e.i. I don't agree with these practices but I don't think they should be illegal either in the way that I think Factory Farming should be illegal). Would you agree with this legal framework in principle?
"...tell me how it is you can get DHA on plant based diet?"
I mentioned diet in a previous thread. Speaking for myself, I have not experienced any adverse health effects as of now being 4+ years vegan. Now, if I did experience adverse effects at some point in the future with substantial reason to believe that it was connected to my vegan lifestyle, then I would progressively (in a "climb the ladder" format) introduced meat back into my diet with the principle in mind of committing the least amount of pain I could and maintain a healthy diet/lifestyle for myself. In theory, "climbing the ladder" would look like this:
0. Vegan
1. Clams, Muscles, ect.
2. Fishing (Going fishing myself)
3. Other seafood that I could potentially "fish" for myself
4. Hunt mammals
5. Local Farming
Now, going up from one stage of the ladder to the next I would require a lot of evidence of its necessity/utility to do so (because the cost for the animals is so high) but I do not object to the ethics of this framework. People have a right to live healthy lives if possible. I think we would both agree that this is not what is happening at all at the moment however?