Debate Score:	45
Arguments:	27
Total Votes:	51
More Stats

This house supports the UN's proposed anti-blasphemy law.

Definitions:

House = international commnunity

anti-blasphemy law = the law proposed to the UN after the recent uprisings in Libya against the US ambassador.

The debate is about whether the UN should legalize the law. What are the benefits? What are the harms? Will it actually prevent violent uprisings? Is it an infringement of freedom of expression? Discuss

We support this. Side Score: 13		We do not support this. Side Score: 32
Add New Argument		Add New Argument

kjgallmeyer (22)

1 point

I'd say you just need to put on red and try to fit in people! we communist are finally taking over.

11 years ago Side: We support this.

Support Dispute Clarify

Linsdip (111)

1 point

Seems to me we have laws that make racial hatred illegal and racial prejudice or just straight forward prejudice is illegal so by extrapolation then Anti Blashemy should be the same. Blashemy promotes racial hatred and is already kind of illegal so lets make it proper illegal

11 years ago Side: We support this.

Support Dispute Clarify

Add New Argument

GuitaristDog (2548)

5 points

FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD FUCK MUHAMMAD

Arrest me, I fucking dare you!

11 years ago Side: We do not support this.

Support Dispute Clarify

↑ Hide Replies

ChadOnSunday (1863)

1 point

I sense some lyrical inspiration coming on...

Sounds punk. Or metal. As fuck.

11 years ago Side: We do not support this.

Support Dispute Clarify

↑ Hide Replies

GuitaristDog (2548)

1 point

Yeah, I could picture Joan Jett singing this at a concert in Israel.

11 years ago Side: We do not support this.

Support Dispute Clarify

whereingred (3) Disputed

1 point

Arrest you? Yeah...I don't believe you'd do shit, except shit on yourself.

11 years ago Side: We support this.

Support Dispute Clarify

↑ Hide Replies

GuitaristDog (2548) Disputed

1 point

Its funny, cause your not and it makes no sense. Fuck Muhammad and you.

11 years ago Side: We do not support this.

Support Dispute Clarify

Lynaldea (1231) Disputed

1 point

DAMMAHUM KCUF....... you're ridiculous.

You're fuckin trippin man, woman, whichever way you roll.

11 years ago Side: We support this.

Support Dispute Clarify

EnigmaticMan (1840)

3 points

I have never supported the United Nations' right to dictate domestic policy . I do not admit of any unelected body, the right to dictate the laws by which all sovereign nations are bound, forasmuch as their decrees overrule those of the elected national government. Nor do I believe that religious beliefs of any kind ought to be protected by secular law.

11 years ago Side: We do not support this.

Support Dispute Clarify

↑ Hide Replies

Qymosabi (203) Disputed

1 point

It is obvious that you lack sound judgement. The world has become a smaller place because of a variety of communications systems. "You" are wrong (for once haha) this is the perfect time in history for ALL nations large and small to have these words added to their constitution to speak with one voice on the one issue that disrupts the everyday life of ordinary people throughout the world...."religion". "TO ENSURE DOMESTIC TRANQIILITY"....and enforce it! Disrespect towards to religious faith of others publicly in any manner should be strictly prohibited and soup n' crackers should be ones diet in prison for 90 days and 20 lashes of the whip every third day as a reminder of the severity of your crime of disturbing....domestic tranquility. This would all but end playing the "religion" card throughout the world literally....over night.

11 years ago Side: We support this.

Support Dispute Clarify

↑ Hide Replies

EnigmaticMan (1840) Disputed

3 points

It is obvious that you lack sound judgement.

What is obvious is that you are a bitter, hateful person, who derives his pleasure principally in the issue of incendiary remarks against individuals and nations. I had thought myself well rid of you.

The world has become a smaller place because of a variety of communications systems.

And how precisely does this give the United Nations the right to repeal over two hundred years of the separation of church and state?

this is the perfect time in history for ALL nations large and small to have these words added to their constitution to speak with one voice on the one issue that disrupts the everyday life of ordinary people throughout the world...."religion".

You are simply spewing nonsense. You make no attempt to support your arguments by logic or reason, and seem to think that declaring one's opinion loudly is enough to make it sound.

Disrespect towards to religious faith of others publicly in any manner should be strictly prohibited and soup n' crackers should be ones diet in prison for 90 days and 20 lashes of the whip every third day as a reminder of the severity of your crime of disturbing....domestic tranquility.

You are such a boring, tedious man. I imagine that you are an embarrassment even to your fellow Negroes.

This would all but end playing the "religion" card throughout the world literally....over night.

Yes, imprison everybody who disagrees, and you end dissent. Ingenious.

11 years ago Side: We do not support this.

Support Dispute Clarify

GuitaristDog (2548) Disputed

2 points

Freedom of speech should have no limits and offending someone should never be illegal. If you want to be a fascist you missed the Soviet Russia and Nazi Germany but I hear North Korea has some openings.

11 years ago Side: We do not support this.

Support Dispute Clarify

↓ Show Replies

kjgallmeyer (22) Disputed

1 point

I disagree. We are in great strides at becoming communist. I would argue that as a whole we are more communist than capitalist. There's a reason the Berlin wall came down. Our side finally had enough communism to mesh well. So here we are, Communist USA. What are you going to do about it? Let me tell you what. NOTHING! That's because your vote doesn't matter. All that matters is who's counting the votes. SO GET USED TO IT! Your freedoms are getting ready to all come crashing down!

11 years ago Side: We support this.

Support Dispute Clarify

↓ Show Replies

GuitaristDog (2548) Disputed

1 point

I'm talking about limitations on free speech, not communism.

What are you going to do about it? Let me tell you what. NOTHING! That's because your vote doesn't matter. All that matters is who's counting the votes. SO GET USED TO IT! Your freedoms are getting ready to all come crashing down!

I don't need to vote for liberties there are billions of people like me who fight back against your oppression.

11 years ago Side: We do not support this.

Support Dispute Clarify

↓ Show Replies

ChadOnSunday (1863)

2 points

It would infringe on freedom of and from religion as well as freedom of speech and expression all for the sake of not wanting a few radical Muslims to hear opposing opinions that might challenge their barbaric ideals. I do not support this.

11 years ago Side: We do not support this.

Support Dispute Clarify

Hellno (17753)

2 points

-Blasphemy had nothing to do with what happened in Libya.

-Who cares about a "UN law"? It wouldn't mean anything.

-Fuck the UN

11 years ago Side: We do not support this.

Support Dispute Clarify

joecavalry (40163)

1 point

To heck with the U.N. (sorry about the foul language ;)

T H I S - I S - A M E R I C A ! ! ! !

Too bad there's never a deep hole close by where you can kick someone into it for dramatic effect ;)

What is the U.N. Going to do? Break my door every time I post something on CD ;)

11 years ago Side: We do not support this.

Support Dispute Clarify

Cuaroc (8829)

1 point

Why should their be a new law because some muslims over reacted?

11 years ago Side: We do not support this.

Support Dispute Clarify

↑ Hide Replies

joecavalry (40163)

1 point

I think they are called little sheet heads ;)

11 years ago Side: We do not support this.

Support Dispute Clarify

Emperor (1348)

1 point

I support a "No killing people and destroying property law for any reason" law.

Because the alternative is insane.

11 years ago Side: We do not support this.

Support Dispute Clarify

↑ Hide Replies

kjgallmeyer (22) Disputed

3 points

sure Mackinlaw-law..............................................

11 years ago Side: We support this.

Support Dispute Clarify

↑ Hide Replies

Emperor (1348) Disputed

1 point

What??..........................................................................................?

11 years ago Side: We do not support this.

Support Dispute Clarify

Lysenko (38)

1 point

All anti-blasphemy laws are just theists who aren't confident in their own beliefs imposing their insecurities into global law.

11 years ago Side: We do not support this.

Support Dispute Clarify

wardogninja (1789)

1 point

Taking away freedom of speech for fear of violence is dangerously wrong

11 years ago Side: We do not support this.

Support Dispute Clarify

Add New Argument

#1	#2	#3
Paste this URL into an email or IM:	Click here to send this debate via your default email application.	Click here to login and CreateDebate will send an email for you.

Debate Info

Argument Ratio

Debate Creator

This house supports the UN's proposed anti-blasphemy law.

We support this.

We do not support this.

Browse More Debates

Already a Member? Login.	OR		Join CreateDebate! It's quick and easy.