That's that fake, plastic, secular moral highground they keep telling you about.

There's no objective morality so rape isn't objectively wrong. It is however, counterproductive and destructive behaviour. With morality, all it takes is for someone to not give a fuck for it to be thrown out the window. It doesn't matter if you label it "objective" or not. There will always be those that defy morality and law, but if people where raised to understand that in order to have a productive and safe society which is most beneficial to both their selfish interests and those of others instead of just indoctrinating them with morality hoping they care or threatening them with laws and hoping they don't find a way to get away with breaking them then even a psychopath will agree not to rape or murder etc. because they will understand that it's in their best interests not to.

Psychobabble from the Drooling Slobbering Lack of Facts

Lack of Facts is a psychopath. That is not a debatable question. The transparency is easily viewed.

There is nothing to agree or disagree with in this witch's brew of disjointed miscellanea.

It's no more than a feeble attempt to create a debate out of series of unrelated irrelevant trivialities and see if anyone is going to take the gobbledygook seriously.

I am not going to play a victim, but make a logical case that rape is wrong. It causes suffering, burden, and undue distress in the victim. This is what is wrong with the liberal left. They have literally no ojective morality, just like Joseph Stalin.