First off, it is hilarious for someone to completely deny actual observed evidence while telling others that they aren't following their own beliefs. There are gay animals in nature. Just get over it already. It wasn't a well thought out argument any way. Banning stuff not seen in nature would mean getting rid of religion. You shouldn't even try to make the argument that homosexuality is unnatural.

Evolutionarily speaking, it actually makes more sense to allow gay marriage. Forcing gay people to marry the opposite sex would just increase the likelihood of gay people if it is genetic. Even if it isn't genetic it would probably lead to less children. Let's take 3 couples: a gay man couple, gay woman couple, and a straight couple. If you force the gay couples to pair up nothing changes. But, if one of the gay men pairs up with the straight woman, and a gay woman pairs up with the straight man, and the last gay man pairs up with the gay woman you will see a problem. The straight couple would have 3 children because they are actually attracted to each other, but a couple with one gay person in it is only going to have 1 child. And a mixed couple of 2 gay people won't have any children because they don't like each other. When the gays are forced to marry the opposite sex you end up getting 2 children out of 3 couples instead of 3 children. That would reduce the number of people and reduce the chances of humanity surviving which goes against evolution.

With feminism you have missed the point of the feminist movement. Sexual dimorphism happens with sexual reproducing species, but the individuals of that species are still relatively equal. It only leads to different roles in making babies. The idea that women can do anything that a man can do is to change the idea that they can't do anything. It isn't enough to just say that women can work outside the home, they still need to be hired when they are qualified. The fight isn't over. The slogan that woman can do anything a man can do is not supposed to be taken 100% literally. If you want to argue against feminists who think there shouldn't be male sports, or who complain about sexism that doesn't actually exist, I would have no problem with that. But, when you lump all feminists together, even the ones who are just legitimately trying to make sure there is equal opportunity, then you are wrong.

Lets take feminism for example.....Feminists scream WE CAN DO ANYTHING A MAN CAN DO! I believe that statement is rebelling against the natural order of males and females? Why do you think we have so many separate female and male sports? It's because girls are not as good as the guys in most physical sports. Yet feminists deny the obvious when it comes to so many things in life.

While it is true that generally men are stronger, that doesn't mean there aren't exceptions. If a woman is as capable as a man then regardless she should have the same opportunity. Or at least have the ability to make that opportunity herself.

Feminists fear any notion that they are better designed for the nurturing of our children while the father is better designed to support the family.

Evolution doesn't "design" anything. It is based on survival of the fittest, and doesn't care about societal norms.

Feminists have severe insecurity issues case you missed it. They look at the natural roles of females and males in a family structure and say, we want to take the male role in life.

You realize that you are the exact misogynistic straw-man most feminists look for? Again, evolution doesn't assign any gender based roles.

On average, women do not posses the physical strength of a man.

This is true, testosterone helps with muscle growth - that doesn't mean there aren't exceptions though.

Man can not breast feed Babies. There is a natural order to life as we see in the animal kingdom.

Actually no, there is an apparent order which people themselves attributed to nature. To reiterate - evolution is not a "belief system," it is simply an explanation for the diversity of life. It does not care about how things appear to be, whatever works best survives. Additionally, that doesn't mean that we inherently have to carry out evolution - I mean going by your logic here Hitler had a justifiable motive.

But feminists rebel against their own beliefs of evolution when they deny the natural order of the male and female.

There is no natural order - just how things happened to evolve.

The Left bought right into this nonsense because of political correctness and their fixation to lift up anything at odds with our Christian heritage.

What the hell does political correctness have to do with evolution? No one supports the theory of evolution just to "lift up anything at odds with out Christian heritage." They do so because it is supported by facts and evidence - intelligent design has jack shit when it comes to proof. Additionally - we do not have a "Christian heritage," the US was made a secular country.

Before you start twisting my words as usual, I in no way would ever want to prevent women from having the freedom to pursue whatever job or life they would choose.

So why did you make this debate? The premise of it is skewed at best.

We had no laws forcing women to be homemkers 50 years ago. We simply as an inteligent people understood the natural roles of men and women and most did what was best for their family's well being.

Okay I'm sure that the no laws thing is bullshit, but I'm not going to bother with the research. Oh I see now, so the flawed premise of your debate here is that people who support the theory of evolution aren't misogynistic, and that supposedly contradicts evolution. So you decide to claim the moral high-ground here by saying that you ARE a misogynist, but don't support evolution.

Another example is the Left's fixation with Homosexuaity. It is completely at odds with evolution and the propagation of our species.

Yes because we need MORE people now, that's how to solve overpopulation.

Oh they will try and say there are gay animals running all over the forrests and they would be liars.

Well you can find examples of it here here and [here] (http://www.news-medical.net/news/2006/10/23/1500-animal-species-practice-homosexuality.aspx)

They bring up supposed Gay geese when in fact the paring of two male geese never involves sex. Gee, maybe the female Geese died and there were only other male geese to pair up with? Nah, they must be Gay Geese!

Well we do in fact see gay sex in animals so yeah

When's the last time you saw any gay pets who refused to have sex with the opposite sex?Dogs will come on to anything that moves so spare me. To be gay means you have no attraction for the opposite sex. We do not see this in our pets and one should be asking why? If homosexuality is natural why do we not see it in our pets?

Read the articles

There are many other examples of the Left totally ignoring and rebelling against the natural order of their own belief system of evolution.

Evolution is not a belief system

Hey, maybe this is why our families are so broken?

Well idk about your family but mine's okay

Not only do Progessives ignore our Christian heritage and the moral values that once kept our families together, they also ignore the obvious roles of men and women through evolution? They are truly lost!

Pull your head out of your ass, seriously

So are you against cars or computers since they aren't natural?

To be gay means you have no attraction for the opposite sex.

Not true it means you have attraction for the same sex.