#1 |
#2 |
#3 |
Paste this URL into an email or IM: |
Click here to send this debate via your default email application.
|
Click here to login and CreateDebate will send an email for you.
|
Cool
Side Score: 24
|
 |
No cool
Side Score: 39
|
|
1
point
1
point
Look.. I don't argue with videos because they can't argue back. How is a book different? I'm letting you know there's a new book out there that's #1 on the best seller list you should read. Don't you want a copy to understand the vile deeds and nature of your media? Side: No cool
1
point
1
point
So no rebuttal or response to why the left wing media covered up the Holocaust and named Hitler Man of the Year Hello bront: Well, there ya go. You DON'T know what a straw man is.. Lemme help. STRAW MAN: An intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument. So says google. DUDE! excon Side: Cool
1
point
set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument. Except that you didn't make any argument for your claim to be true. An intentionally misrepresented proposition My question is in the book, isn't a misrepresented proposition, is objectively true, thus it is on topic, relevant, and you still haven't answered it. Side: No cool
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
Okay, why was the left wing press trying to cover up the Holocaust, and why did they name Hitler "Man of the year"? Hello bront: Alright.. I'll engage you.. That you BELIEVE such hogwash is fucking amazing.. DUDE! That you believe the American press supported Hitler during WW II, is more than fucking amazing... It's absolutely INSANE.. So, YES.. It's a straw man, alright.. A dirty, nasty, lying, piece of shit straw man. excon Side: Cool
1
point
That you believe the American press supported Hitler during WW II, is more than fucking amazing... It's absolutely INSANE.. Oh? Is it objectively true that Hitler was named Time Magazine's "Man of the Year" and didn't villify him, but glorified him? Isn't it true that the New York Times itself has spoken about its deeds during that time and doesn't deny my claim? Side: No cool
1
point
That you BELIEVE such hogwash is fucking amazing.. DUDE! Oh? Do you believe that the Communist Party Directive instructed its members to tie fascism to the right as a smear? I do, but I've read it. Do you believe the CPD tells its followers to call its opposition "racists" until it sticks? I do, but I've read it. Side: No cool
why did the left wing press try to cover up the Holocaust, and why did they name Hitler "Man of the year"? Hello again, bront: Ok... I see where you're coming from.. Time magazine named Hitler man of the year BEFORE he started WWII.. In terms of your Holocaust straw man.. NOBODY knew about the Holocaust until AFTER the fucking war. So, YES.. It's a straw man, alright.. A dirty, nasty, lying, piece of shit straw man. excon Side: Cool
1
point
The Times has already admitted it knew, and apologized. Hello again, bront: I say again, NOBODY knew.. The camps were liberated between 1944 and 1945. The first major camp, Majdanek, was discovered by the advancing Soviets on July 23, 1944. So says google... One more time, your fucking LIE is a nasty, piece of shit, straw man.. excon Side: Cool
1
point
I say again, NOBODY knew The Times admits it knew and has issued an apology. Side: No cool
The Times admits it knew and has issued an apology Hello again, bront: I see where your right wing rag says the Times apologized, but could you link me an actual NY Times story where they apologized?? If you can, I'd sure be appreciative.. It's NOT that I don't believe right wing media, but I DON'T believe right wing media. excon Side: Cool
1
point
1
point
So why does the left seem comfortable with people who hate Jews? Hello bront: STRAW MAN, STRAW MAN, STRAW MAN, and even STRAW MANIER than that... See, when you put something up there that ISN'T true, and then as us to defend it, IS a CLASSICAL STRAW MAN... I dunno what's so hard to understand.. Look.. Try a little whataboutism.. You'll have better luck with that.. For example, you could say what about that Muslim congress lady or even Kieth Ellison.. They hate Jews, right? I mean they're the left, right? DUDE! excon Side: Cool
1
point
1
point
1
point
Look.. Try a little whataboutism.. You'll have better luck with that.. For example, you could say what about that Muslim congress lady or even Kieth Ellison.. They hate Jews, right? I mean they're the left, right? So you admit there are antisemites flooding the left. Name any right winger in Congress who has said anything antisemitic. Side: No cool
1
point
not believing in pseudo-science make you a hater of Juden? Hello hater and science denier: DUDE! You BELIEVE in a time machine, right?? So, my DNA is pseudo science, but time travel is REAL??? Snicker.. Snicker... Bwa HA HA HA HA HA.. DUDE!! excon, Jewish Prince, science BELIEVER Side: No cool
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
In your twisted, decayed mind does not supporting Israel and not believing in pseudo-science make you a hater of Juden? No. Pointing only at Israel when Muslim countries do worse as you don't point at them is antisemitism. Otherwise one would call out Islamic countries for killing gays and punishing women for...being raped, or perhaps for gassing their own people... Side: No cool
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
Isn't it true that Saul Alinsky told his Commie followers to dress as Klansmen and attend Republican events in his pamphlet on this topic called “Rules for Revolution”? Is it not true that a person dressed as a Klansman showed up at a Trump rally, but was tossed out by security on command by Trump from the podium? Side: No cool
Isn't it true that Saul Alinsky told his Commie followers to dress as Klansmen Hello again, bront: Another straw man???? DUDE! I'm a lib and I've never heard of Alinsky.. Personally, I follow the Constitution.. Maybe you should ask his actual commie followers.. We got some. excon Side: Cool
1
point
the Democratic Party not only know full well who he is, they quote him, Hello again, bront: Another straw man??? DUDE! I PAY attention to politics. I PAY attention to WHO says WHAT.. I am QUITE well informed, as you well know.. Or, maybe you don't.. Personally, I have NEVER heard of Alinsky until you brought him up.. Plus, I have NEVER heard ANY leader of the Democratic party QUOTE this guy or make REFERENCE to him.. Could you LINK us to ANY Democratic leader who says such nonsense... Otherwise, it's a dirty, nasty, stinkin, piece of shit straw man.. excon Side: Cool
1
point
Personally, I have NEVER heard of Alinsky until you brought him up.. Plus, I have NEVER heard ANY leader of the Democratic party QUOTE this guy or make REFERENCE to him.. Yes, but that's because you aren't familiar with him. It's like if I hear the terms "he who lives by the sword shall die by the sword" or "know the truth, and the truth shall set you free", etc, I know it's Jesus, whether the person says it's Jesus or not. The same applies to Alinsky disciples. Side: No cool
1
point
Could you LINK us to ANY Democratic leader who says such nonsense... Otherwise, it's a dirty, nasty, stinkin, piece of shit straw man.. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HillaryRodhamseniorthesis https://washingtonmonthly. Side: No cool
Could you LINK us to ANY Democratic leader who says such nonsense... Otherwise, it's a dirty, nasty, stinkin, piece of shit straw man.. Hello again bront: I'm sorry.. I asked for a Democratic LEADER.. Clinton isn't a leader. Never was a leader.. She's a follower of Alinsky.. No wonder she lost.. Got anybody else? Shumer, Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler, Cummings??? You know the LEADERSHIP of the Democratic party.. Any Alinskyites among them? excon Side: Cool
1
point
1
point
Got anybody else? Shumer, Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler, Cummings??? You know the LEADERSHIP of the Democratic party.. Any Alinskyites among them? Yes. That's why these "committees" look like Stalin's Star Chamber. Dems: Crime? We don't need a crime. We're investigating a person, in case there's a crime. Bronto: investigating anyone else just in case? Dems: No. Just him. Side: No cool
1
point
1
point
Sure it is. Let's take a peek, shall we? Side: No cool
1
point
Right Con. Would you care to share with us your position on gun grabs? Hello bront: My position on the Constitution is that it CAN be amended... Article V of the Constitution says so.... Therefore to SUPPORT amending the Constitution, pursuant TO the Constitution, is certainly indicative of my SUPPORT for the Constitution.. To your specific question, long dead right wing Antonin Scalia, said in Heller, that the 2nd Amendment CAN be modified. Heller stated that the right to bear arms is not unlimited and that guns and gun ownership would continue to be regulated. excon Side: Cool
1
point
To your specific question, long dead right wing Antonin Scalia, said in Heller, that the 2nd Amendment CAN be modified. Heller stated that the right to bear arms is not unlimited and that guns and gun ownership would continue to be regulated. Yes, but we have leftists on this site and elsewhere who don't want to "ammend" or "midify", but to abolish. Side: No cool
1
point
Gonna throw in a little whataboutism, huh? Very cool. Or the reality of your party being flooded with not "gun law amenders" but "gun grabbers". Notice, my party has no gun grabbers due to my party supporting liberty and freedom. Yours party wants gun grabs. You yourself admit you want a gun grab. Why? Because theleft believes we all belong to the omnipotent state, and that we are its slaves. Now, as for "whataboutism", now explain to us why pointing out your party is flooded with antisemites and gungrabbers is "whataboutism" and then explain to us how saying "whataboutism" isn't simply the left's way of deflecting when people point out their hypocrisy. I'll wait. Side: No cool
1
point
|
1
point
1
point
1
point
|
