CreateDebate


Debate Info

8
8
True Wait..., what? No!
Debate Score:16
Arguments:9
Total Votes:16
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 True (6)
 
 Wait..., what? No! (3)

Debate Creator

joecavalry(40163) pic



Voting criteria for the 2012 presidential elections

 

 "If you voted for Obama in 2008 to  prove you're not a racist, you'll have to vote for someone else in 2012 to prove you're not an idiot."

True

Side Score: 8
VS.

Wait..., what? No!

Side Score: 8

I'm sorry. People send me CD fodder all day every day and I feel compelled to post it ;)

Side: True
2 points

Don't be sorry, I happen to agree with the sentiment .

Side: True

Oh. OK then. Freaking Obama voters! There. I feel much better now. It's good to let it out ;)

Side: True
1 point

I completely agree ;)

Side: True

I say vote Green!!!! In my opinion in Canada they are the best party overall. In average on the other parties running in the election.

Side: True

It is true overall. If you did it just to prove your not a racist. Then you are racist. You vote for someone just because their colour is different and you dont want to be called racist. So really you are because you are not voting on what your true opinion is.

Side: True
4 points

It should be changed to: "If you voted for Obama in 2008 to prove you're not a racist, you'll have to vote for Palin in 2012 to prove you're not prejudice against "special" people"

Side: Wait..., What? No!
3 points

I'm not a fan of the compromiser in chief you guys elected, he is weak, hypocritical and can barely be considered liberal. As much as I am not a fan of Obama he will most likely be the lesser of two evils between him and some fundy republican nut job. I would still rather have another Obama than another Bush.

Side: Lesser of Two Evils
1 point

Curse you man! LOL! Anyone is better than Barry !

Side: Wait..., What? No!