CreateDebate


Debate Info

17
16
yes no
Debate Score:33
Arguments:24
Total Votes:45
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 yes (10)
 
 no (14)

Debate Creator

kyauta(46) pic



War is the best way to solve conflicts

yes

Side Score: 17
VS.

no

Side Score: 16
3 points

wars are the good way to end conflicts because wars show that how powerful a county is and makes other countries to never dare attack this county

Side: yes
LoveU(339) Disputed
1 point

Still, its violent. Wars includes killing and hamful activities.i also don't think war passes the morality standard for it includes vengeance, wrath, greed, envy and pride. There's no peace and compassion at war.

Side: no
thingsthink(2) Disputed
1 point

You say they are a good way to end conflicts not the best way and that's what we are debating, on top of that solving conflicts don't just need you to show off the number of power you have to scare away others you do realize that concept is also the concept of middle and high school bullies use right? Morally speaking when did bullying become the best way to solve a topic I thought they taught in school to 10-year-olds that doing such an act is wrong? To all those who say war is the best way to end conflicts, you do know WWI was seen as the war to end all wars? Guess what though it wasn't. In other words, we can look at our own history as proof that war is not the best way to solve conflicts, it just causes animosity towards one another and creates more war.

Side: no
rickitomph(8) Disputed
1 point

One of the standout features of this device is its versatility. Whether I was camping in the wilderness or conducting nighttime surveillance, the Night Vision Plomotactical https://www.plomotactical.com/night-vision proved to be a valuable asset. Its lightweight and compact design made it easy to carry, and the durable construction meant I didn't have to worry about it getting damaged during rugged outdoor activities.

Side: no
2 points

That depends on the conflict. There are instances of tyrants and psychopaths who are and were unaffected by reason and diplomacy, and, in that instance, war is necessary to save lives and democratic principles.

Side: yes
2 points

It is because if they say lets talk and you go then they could kill you with a gun

Side: yes
2 points

If You go to talk then they may shoot you when you visit them.

Side: yes
2 points

How could anyone not get along after hearing this song?

"War Lyrics:

"Why Can't We Be Friends?"

Why can't we be friends?

Why can't we be friends?

Why can't we be friends?

Why can't we be friends?

I've seen you 'round for a long long time

I remembered you when you drank my wine

Why can't we be friends?

Why can't we be friends?

Why can't we be friends?

Why can't we be friends?

I've seen you walking down in Chinatown

I called you but you could not look around

Why can't we be friends?

Why can't we be friends?

Why can't we be friends?

Why can't we be friends?

I paid my money to the welfare line

I see you standing in it every time

Why can't we be friends?

Why can't we be friends?

Why can't we be friends?

Why can't we be friends?

The color of your skin don't matter to me

As long as we can live in harmony

Why can't we be friends?

Why can't we be friends?

Why can't we be friends?

Why can't we be friends?

I'd kind of like to be the President

So I can show you how your money's spent

Why can't we be friends?

Why can't we be friends?

Why can't we be friends?

Why can't we be friends?

Sometimes I don't speak right

But yet I know what I'm talking about

Why can't we be friends?

Why can't we be friends?

Why can't we be friends?

Why can't we be friends?

I know you're working for the CIA

They wouldn't have you in the Mafi-A.

Why can't we be friends?

Why can't we be friends?

Why can't we be friends?

Why can't we be friends?"

Side: yes
1 point

If it is not, then how do you think the Israelites won Canaan back. It was through war and nothing else.

Side: yes
1 point

wars forces economical growth of the nation

it makes a country good .yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

now u tell yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy yyyy yy yy yy y yy yy y y y yy y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y yy y y y y y y y yy y y y y y y y yy y y y y y y y y y yy y y y tell y yy y y y y y y y yytell tell

Side: yes
1 point

War is the ultimate way to decide an argument in your favor.

It is the tool of those who are unable to succeed in diplomacy for whatever reason.

Many wars are fought because oppressed people lack the ability to protect and defend their own position and must be assisted by those who have the power to take down an oppressive regime.

Other wars are fought for territory and power within a region.

Still there are other conflicts waged because intolerance toward religious belief compels people to arms rather than being willing to 'live and let live'.

While we all wish that we could live in peace, we have yet to developer a civilization that can truly overlook the offenses that are deliberately caused by another without becoming the doormat of the world's dictators.

War is sometimes the ONLY way to solve a conflict but should never be the first option.

Side: yes
1 point

Peace has no alternative. And peace has no replacement. However, no matter how peaceful one is unless the other party does not respond by peace. Sometimes war may bring a temporary solution to the peace but it may not be as stable as peace.

I am not finding better reference to explain here therefore I am giving an example from ramacharitamanas- when lord Rama was seeking the route by requesting the ocean, even after 3 days there was no response from the ocean then -he said ' Vinay na maanat jaladhi jad Gaye tin din beeti, bole ram sakop tab bhay binu hohi na preeti'

The saying by Rama is equally be applicable to all and and all such situations. What can you expect from a country like Pakistan and North Korea ? Pakistan spending most money on destructive activities, knowing that this is destructive not for India but for the entire world, and most importantly even for the Pakistan itself. For last decade there was not a single terrorism related event happened in any part of the world and Pakistan was not involved.

Pakistan is really a country that doesn't know the language of peace. No peaceful person can sleep with wild wolf. If you want peace, the peace in the same amount must be responded by the other side as well.

Punishment has its own role in promoting positive attribute in a Society. There are some stage where war also brings solution. Therefore, war always not necessarily is negative.

India avoided war against Pakistan result is Kashmir and extinction of 28% Hindu minority from there, plus two war against Pakistan and two war against China. Because of former prime minister Pt. Nehru's peace policy India lost its territory to China and Pakistan.

But in current situation one can see what happened in Doklang, China knew very well that this time the prime minister is different. So, the war was avoided and sought out the peaceful solution.

Peace produces peace all the time not necessary. Therefore, the alternative must be kept always open. Wicked nature person or country may not understand the language of peace. From Hindu scriptures there are several example where war / punishment recommended by the spiritual authorities.

Kaatahi pe kadali fare koti jstan kou seenchi, (Ramacharitamanas) banana can not fruiten unless it is cut down, no matter how many irrigation was given for fruitening. In Sanskrit through subhashitani, scholars have suggested that -shathhe shaathhyam samaacharet. Wicket being does not know the language of peace, it needs to be treated in its own way.

Side: yes
2 points

Wars make women widow, children are orphaned,Mothers loose their darlings.........and some people say that war is the best way to solve conflicts.......how ruthless these people are........

Side: no
1 point

war is not at all good in wars many innocent people dies.

Side: No
1 point

Of course not. First you try to solve with diplomacy and if you do not come out, you have to wait and then war may still be necessary, but that's only in rare cases like that.

Side: No
1 point

A war is never an option. Though certain wars have done a little good with a lot of loss. But, I strongly believe that wars can be avoided. There is always a better solution.

Side: No
1 point

War only achieves one good thing! And that is... culling of the population!

Your all dying for a good cause! Keep the good work up boys!

Side: no

How else does america sell off all the stock pile of weapons,cant keep making and storingthem,cant sell them quick enough even after massive clearance sale america still produces to much so the gun makers cause conflict in syria and then arm the taliban and send them in like salesmen,2 grenades for the price of 1s freedom

Side: no

War solves nothing. War causes death and destruction. War is horrible.

Side: no
0 points

As entertaining as war is, isn't there another way to resolve a conflict so that it doesn't involve bloodshed?

Side: No
0 points

I don't think it's ever the best way, but many times it's the only way.

* wait's for Gary's colorful reply

Side: No
0 points

war is a very good way of resolving conflicts because after the war a decision will came and both the countries can get out of the conflict. yes many lives will be gone but the countries can live in peace

Side: no
tomtomlab Disputed
1 point

you'r not in the good side if you say that, i agree with those who say that war aren't

a good way to solve conflicts. first, it disturb the system of the countries concerned, some populations are destroy cause of war, like per example Austro-Hungary, Tibet, Ottoman Empire etc.

Side: yes
0 points

No, war is the easiest way to solve a conflict, but far from the best. It creates tensions that last years after it's over, leave people poor, destitute, angry, sad, afraid.....very little good will is felt before, during and after a war.

Side: no