Was British rule in India good or bad?
It was
Side Score: 2
|
 |
It wasn't
Side Score: 3
|
|
|
|
|
So, that's your input to the thread. A standard, meaningless Brit response. Cock your ear and you'll soon hear Boris a-knock-knock-knocking on the door of the Brussels Parliament inquiring about the terms for the U.K's re-entry into the E.U. Covid-19 has masked, and been blamed for many of the food shortages, supply and transport problems, the scarcity of labor and additional E.U., travel restrictions that are all attributable to BREXIT. Sort your own house out before you come on here with your Brit arrogance. Side: It was
|
The good which was created by the British in India included the establishment of Democracy in both national and local government administrations. The British legal structure and judiciary processes still form the foundation upon which the Indian legal system is based. The wind of change which started to blow through the Asian and African continents from the early part of the last century saw the demise of Military rule in the nations of the British Empire. Note how the go-ahead Indian people now work with the British for the common good of both nations. Instead of adopting a Bongo style VICTIMHOOD MENTALITY of bellyaching about THE BIG BAD WHITE MAN the Indian nation is going from strength-to-strength in all fields including technology and industrial development. Side: It wasn't
|
