Was Ronald Reagan the best President in modern American history?
He was
Side Score: 26
|
 |
He wasn't
Side Score: 22
|
|
|
|
|
1
point
Sorry for the long post it is a far more complicated Topic then it looks. There are no Best Presidents. Just Presidents men who represent all men before basic principle and legal precedent. Before the talk of discrimination clouds the ability to read and Constitutional law a woman’s title would be along the line of Prasedera. There is only one leader In Military Order. To answer the question we must have a clear understand what a President of the United States really is, and is not. By Constitutional Union the President is a Military Title demonstrated by ability. The Executive officer of the legislative branch of Government can seek this title by inherent right to defend, preserve and protect the United States Constitution. The information Nomenclature talks about is about a “Drug War.” Which in effect is a public declaration about condition of War, found by a President who may not yet have full intelligence, or reports to the nature of Constitutional separation in a Civil War of this nature. This War moving on to become a known begging of an international type Chemical War that was a toned down I.D. to create a lesser alarm. As Executive Officer expressing alibies by oath to President and judicial Separation by Courts, Executive Officer Reagan goes on to effect the Cold War which itself was a toned down explanation to another ongoing War and its escalation to Atomic War, the basic principles hidden in Atomic War joining it to the Drug War is Chemical War. All three Wars are Chemical based. Keep in mind that the War’s direction of assault was against the United States of Constitution, by organized crime operating in multiple Nation. These crime syndicates are what can be described as private militia as well. Presidential burdens of this time period may go into details on explanation of justification to Military Code and Conduct made in the time period of the 80’s. While a Congressional Militia known, or describes as, Congressional Arm Force Formed by public legislative action perpetuated by civil authority, expressing the addition of woman. This process was to relieve the Military’s position of an all-male Military Constitutional representation as fighting force preserving the United States Constitutional separation process. By a paid and trained station provided by a United State again a Military presidential obligation. Keep in mind as reading there is something I do not pick up in this debate. A grievance over War is not a description to understanding the abilities a person must display to be a President. It is not a Media Title, it is a Military station or rank, it is also not a democratic title, and a person can be relieved of command by demonstration, and not just rack inside of Martial authority. The relive of command processes always begins with a direct address to Constitutional preservation. Side: He was
|
5
points
Are you mad? Reagan funded terrorist states in Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras. He labelled them "fledgling democracies". In El Salvador, the government literally sent out roving military death squads at night to execute dissidents and their families. Under Reagan's leadership, the United States of America became the only state in recorded history to be convicted of international terrorism after the world court ruled it had "unlawfully used force" in the bombing of Nicaragua. He willingly traded with and aided apartheid South Africa, even sidestepping congressional legislation aimed at stopping him. He oversaw the selling of arms to Iran, including HAWK and TOW missiles. He sold chemical and biological weapons to Saddam Hussein. The exact same chemical and biological weapons Saddam used to gas his own people. Under Reagan, the American CIA became a drug smuggling operation to rival the top Colombian cartels. How about you start another thread and ask if Hitler was the best leader of Germany in modern history? You know you want to. Secretly. Side: He wasn't
2
points
Well let's use your claims Nom. He oversaw the selling of arms to Iran. And yet you can't condemn Obama. He sold chemical and biological weapons to Saddam Hussein. The exact same chemical and biological weapons Saddam used to gas his own people. And then you condemned Bush for attacking Sadaam Hussein, accusing him of war crimes... Drug smuggling We know for a fact that Obama protected Hezbollah's drug ring from the American CIA. From you? Nerry a rebuke. Side: He was
1
point
1
point
Reagan funded terrorist states in Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras. He labelled them "fledgling democracies". In El Salvador, the government literally sent out roving military death squads at night to execute dissidents and their families Interesting that you don't have the same labeling terminology towards countries in the Middle East that are guilty of worse. Interesting that you don't have similar rebukes for liberal governments nor the UN for enabling similar or worse behavior. Side: He was
1
point
Interesting that you don't have the same labeling terminology towards countries in the Middle East that are guilty of worse. You literally made that up you mad Nazi halfwit. You have never asked my opinion about death squads, nor have you ever provided any examples of governments which use them, in the Middle East or anywhere else on planet Earth. You are literally fucking ridiculous. Stop making up arguments and telling me they are mine, and stop deflecting the topic of your own debate. Side: He wasn't
|
