CreateDebate


Debate Info

5
3
Let them run amok unhindered. Deny them confrontation.
Debate Score:8
Arguments:11
Total Votes:9
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Let them run amok unhindered. (3)
 
 Deny them confrontation. (2)

Debate Creator

Miocene(557) pic



We sould give the rioters and looters enough rope with which to hang themselves.

The rioting filth are seeking a body of authority against which they can be seen opposing.
When they become emboldened with the lack of law and order their destructive and murderous activities will become more frequent and devastating. As their mindless rampaging progresses their support will dwindle and most of their ardent supporters within the rioter's 'no go zones' will push back and demand an end to the rioter's criminality and a return to the rule of law.
The deployment of any of the security forces or law enforcement agencies is exactly what scum bags want.

Let them run amok unhindered.

Side Score: 5
VS.

Deny them confrontation.

Side Score: 3
3 points

The rioting filth are seeking a body of authority against which they can be seen opposing.

They'll just start pretending to be right wingers and fight each other just as Alinsky taught them to do. The time for attempting to reason with these maniacs is over.

Side: Let them run amok unhindered.
Miocene(557) Clarified
1 point

It's a question of winning their hearts and minds.

But when you have such filth by the balls their hearts and minds usually follow.

Side: Let them run amok unhindered.
1 point

Left to their own destructive ways the rioting dirt ball's true colours will be on display for the world to see.

Most of 'THE FILTH' are no more than 'virtue signalling' idlers who find the media coverage of their criminality to be good for their ego.

Side: Let them run amok unhindered.
1 point

Nothing gives the anarchists more stature than to be seen confronting the repressive forces of law and order.

Such confrontations are the most effective form of recruitment promotion the FILTH could hope for so let them run out of steam.

Side: Deny them confrontation.
1 point

Your avatar is of a proud moment in America's history. Many other proud moments were when the REAL America set up military attacks, movements, operations, that considered minimizing "collateral damage".

We've had SOME politicians who were against such a "weakness", but, that's America ... as it was ... when it WAS "great". We did that to minimize the deaths of people we really didn't know for the most part. There is still some resemblance of the OLD America left that considers people we DO know! So, much as some would like to, we don't just grab our AR-15s and go out and mow down everybody hoping to get all the "bad guys". We know everybody, ... even a large majority of those in the streets ARE GOOD AMERICANS! So, it's America's way to separate the bad guys and still protect the First Amendment rights of the GOOD Americans. Rioters and looters are the enemy. Like many of our enemies, they use the cover of innocents to do the dirty work. WE, as Americans, have to be a bit more "surgical" in our attacks, some like YOU (?) would like to see the situation 2nd Amendmentized. That could kill some of the relatives of those raisng the flag on Mt. Suribachi.

I DO agree, we should "give them enough rope" and hang'em when we catch up to them ... let them separate themselves from the "crowd". Many of them will likely be caught, many won't ,but, we kept the collateral damage to a minimum, like America DID when it WAS great ... back around 2016BT and before! ;-)

Side: Deny them confrontation.
Miocene(557) Clarified
1 point

Hi AlofRI, thanks for the reply.

I feel that when the nation is facing such challenges there are no innocents.

Anyone whose actions cause unnecessary demands on our police and health resources during a crisis cannot be described as an innocent.

Side: Let them run amok unhindered.
AlofRI(3126) Clarified
2 points

Well. you have to look at things with your left eye, also. I haven't put any unnecessary demands on our police OR health resources yet, and I'm not alone, so, there ARE some innocents. ;-)

Unlike the current occupier of the White House, who will hold a YUGE rally in Tulsa next week ... that is, if anyone is stupid enough to come! THAT will put a YUGE AND UNNECESSARY DEMAND on BOTH .... during a YUGE CRISIS! And, NO, He's NOT an innocent!

There's a Latin phrase ... it's been a long time ... not sure of the spelling.. "In Absentia Dukatus" (I think) ... "In absence of leadership". He takes our motto "E Pluribus Unum" personally .... and HE is UNUM! :-(

Side: Let them run amok unhindered.
angerissues(16) Clarified
1 point

I am going to ram your ass hole with a 50 foot whale cock.

Side: Let them run amok unhindered.
BellyButton(17) Disputed
1 point

we don't just grab our AR-15s and go out and mow down everybody hoping to get all the "bad guys"

I see no right wingers out in the streets with AR-15s. I see a bunch of armed leftists destroying leftist cities and tormenting their own liberal citizens like the Nazis they are.

Side: Let them run amok unhindered.