What are girls more attracted to?
Lovers or Fighters?
Pretty boys
Side Score: 7
|
 |
Tough guys
Side Score: 8
|
|
|
|
|
Girls don't like big old meatsticks like yourself. They prefer a guy who knows how to dress well, drives a nice new Range Rover, and has access to all the best restaurants and clubs in the area. They don't want to go out with someone who everytime someone looks at them or says hello he's going to jump in their face and try to start a fight.
Side: Pretty boys
What part of "I don't mean meatheads either" did you miss?? I said "able to defend their girl against a rabid crackhead" not "jump in someone's face and start a fight when they say hello". Furthermore, a tough guy can absolutely dress well, drive a range rover, and have access to all the best restaurants and clubs in town. lol, I didn't say to be tough you had to be homeless. Ok, another comparison, for you literary types out there, in the Trojan War, are girls more attracted to Odysseus, or Paris... For you non-literary types, in the movie Troy, are girls more attracted to Brad Pitt, or Orlando Bloom, lol.
Side: Tough guys
1
point
Actually, I think girls are attracted to girth. Maybe length but definitely girth. Oh, and money. Oh, and power. Ok, girth, money and power. But since money is power, then girth and money. But in the future, if doctors find out how to give you girth, then money. Yeah, that's it. Girls are attracted to money. Side: Pretty boys
|
I agree. I don't like guys who take longer to get ready than I do. That said I don't like guys that are always getting into fights and think they have to prove that they are tough guys. I like guys who are smart, and don't feel like they have to prove anything to anyone.
Side: Tough guys
Editor's Note:(I feel I must argue for this side as I was just boxing up at West Point and now have a big ol' black eye, lol) I don't mean meatheads either, I just mean someone that could protect their girl if they had to. So really, from a biological standpoint, girls would be attracted to the tough guy, as he would be strong and in shape (in hunter/gatherer times, this meant he could catch more food for her), and more specifically they would be able to defend her from other animals (or in modern times, Crackheads) Now ladies, for arguments sake, keep in mind that when I say pretty boys, I don't mean a gym rat that takes time to make his hair nice. I mean, scrawny dudes that have a pretty face... Think Jared Leto, for example, would you be happy with him defending you against a crackhead?... I think not!
Side: Tough guys
If we we're to go back to early human history, before the idea of "pretty" came about, history teaches us that women are more attracted to men who can demonstrate a protective and aggressive action. We can look to the animal kingdom today and see this in action. The male who is the strongest, the toughest, and more leader like, is the one who had the pick of the females.
We humans are nothing more than bi-pedal primates, still subject to our primal and natural animal instincts. If you remove all the amenities that society provides us, we would be left to our natural inclinations...and that is to say, that women would more attracted to the men who demonstrate fearlessness, protection, leadership and direction. Side: Tough guys
|
