Some people, I'm afraid, should Not have the right to vote. Maybe people should pass a test before allowed to place a vote for the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. Then again, our rights would be trespassed. Sad, it truly is. I know a lot of Obama supporters are not like this, but what about the ones that are? There votes count the same. No wonder democrats want prisoners to vote! They prey on the clueless. Obama has plenty of reasons to actually vote for him. Why would anyone just go with the color of his skin, and CHOOSE to not be informed. Side: Clueless
1
point
Unfortunately we cannot base the right to vote on the I.Q. of people or their lack of information. One would think that in this election, particularly, people are more informed than ever before because of what's out there on the information highway. Not to worry though, the ignorance is well spread over both candidates voters. I wish I could remember who put up the video that was taken at a picnic or something similar out in Ohio! That was quite a goodie...talk about being uninformed....Sheesh! Also, can you point me toward something that speaks to the portion about Democrats wanting prisoners to vote? I'd love to read that! Side: Not an accurate representation
I've included some of the related links, but am having trouble finding the initial article. I'll add it if I find it... It makes since though. Democrats have always been somewhat more lenient on prisoners that republicans, and if you can give them the right to vote you have both the teacher's union and the prisoner population! I truly believed that this election in particular would at the very least cause a mass amount of people to become informed on politics. I would love to see the Ohio video. I am sure there are people out there on the republican side just as clueless, but I have yet to find a link for them. The Sarah Palin comment should have been a dead giveaway! I suppose I can't even begin to understand how someone who has the privilege of voting throws away the meaning by picking the one who "looks more educated". Appalling. http://news.aol. Side: Not an accurate representation
|
2
points
I believe this is the same video that was in another debate recently...the one where Shockey Jockey sends "Sal" up to Harlem to interview people about Obama. Harlem is THE Afro-American section of New York City. This is certainly not a cross section of voters but a pointed and unfair representation of what Howard Stern does and how he does it. This explanation in no way forgives the ignorance of the people whose snippets made it into the show. A Howard Stern presentation must be taken with a huge grain of Kosher salt (Not a slur, Kosher salt does have larger grains!)because of who and what he represents. I'm certain you can go anywhere in this land and find pockets of people who are equally as uninformed as these people, and on both candidates. One can only hope that when it comes time to vote next week, they vote for the right person, whomever that might be! Side: Not an accurate representation
2
points
I don't think that this is an accurate representation of the whole populace, but I do believe these voters are clueless. HOWEVER, I think that the exact same thing could be done in the south with white voters for McCain. You have to show both sides of the voters, and then make the conclusion about voters in general, not just one side. A small sampling is still indicative of nothing- any poll needs at least 33% to be deemed credible as a correlative relationship in political science, and over 50% in other sciences. Ignorance is apparent on both sides, but be aware that the American people elected to have a democracy where EVEryone votes, so we reap what we sow. C'est la vie. Side: Clueless
|
Welcome to CreateDebate
CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy. If this is your first time checking out a debate, here are some quick tips to help get you started:
- Arguments with the highest score are displayed first. Argument replies (both in favor and in opposition) are displayed below the original argument. To follow along, you may find it helpful to show and hide the replies displayed below each argument.
- To vote for an argument, use these icons: You have the power to cast exactly one vote (either up or down) for each argument. Once you vote, the icon will become grayed out and the argument's score will change. Yes, you can change your vote.
- Debate scores, side scores and tag scores are automatically calculated by an algorithm that primarily takes argument scores into account. All scores are updated in real-time. To learn more about the CreateDebate scoring system, check out the FAQ.
- When you are ready to voice your opinion, use the Add Argument button to create an argument. If you would like to address an existing argument, use the Support and Dispute link within that argument to create a new reply.