What government will dominate the world in the future?
|
Communism will eventually die and democracy will come to dominate the globe. It won't all be true democracies, alot of it will be fake set-ups, but in name at least democracy will rule. "Democracy is the worst form of government, except all the others that have been tried"- Winston Churchill. Side: democracy
1. Communism and Democracy are not independent of each other as communism is an economic system, where democracy is a political system i.e you can have democratic communism 2. It doesn't really matter what system is "best", just which one produces the strongest military and economy. 3. To answer the question, I would have to say China. The U.S is currently on the decline and trillions of dollars in debt. Most of this debt is, you guessed it, owed to China. China has the largest population is the world and the consumerist lifestyle of the west is completely Dependant on the vast array of goods created there. The only way to stop this, I believe, is to boycott China which, living in this wasteful consumerist society, I know will never happen Side: democracy
1
point
If the strongest military mattered, history would have been completely different. A man fighting for freedom and liberty is worth a dozen fighting for a paycheck. As long as freedom and liberty is taken away from some, the goverment that grants freedoms and liberties will dominate. Side: democracy
1
point
1
point
Socialism,it's already starting with America. Whether you like Obama and Bush or not,you have to admit that our economy has become steadfastly worse and worse from Bush's presidency to now. Though Bush did many things to make our economy,he simply laid down the carpet for Obama to finish up the job. Are they aware of what they are doing? Of course they are,it's intentional. You really think that Obama,much less any other president would "coincidently" put arguably the best nation in the world,3 trillion dollars in debt. Of course not,this is all being done on purpose as we make our slow but steady approach towards socialism. Some of our leaders do not care about doing what is "morally" or constitutionally right anymore,they simply care about one thing and that one thing is money. What better way to gain money than through a socialistic government? In truth,there is no better way other than going up to everyone and demanding their money which wouldn't work very well in a country where the constitution guarantees us the right to bear arms. So then Obama must act like he's doing one thing,while in truth,he is doing another. Hidden motives,that seems to be the main way any corrupt leader can accomplish what they want to accomplish. Just look at what is going on in France right now,a fight over socialism. It's sad but true,that is the future of the world. The middle class and the upper class will soon know the horrors of living the life of a poor person. Of course,knowing Obama,he will offer government jobs to those who really need it and in exchange all you'll have to give him is 60% or more of what you make ans you'll most likely pledge your allegiance not to the U.S. Flag,but to him and his czars. Side: Socialism
If everything goes back to Obama and Bush, that'd be just great. But it doesn't. Plus, this is a debate, not a political belief sharing. Here's a few other things that just don't make sense: "Knowing Obama" You know him? 'Some of our leaders don't even know what's morally or constitutionally right anymore" Your point? " you have to admit that our economy has become steadfastly worse and worse from Bush's presidency to now" No, I don't. I have to admit it's gotten better. "Though Bush did many things to make our economy," THOUGH!? Are you saying that he just might have hurt our country? Really, you need to watch a few less Radical rallies and a few more enjoyment programs. Side: democracy
1
point
|
