If it was "dominated", surely there would be no difference. Just the places of male female would interchange. But females have love and compassion their weapons as men have power. So world would have been loving and caring. It would discuss problems on love rather than war. And surely, population would be low. But I don't think they would "Dominate", because domination requires power. Women would have controlled and that too very efficiently.... But it would surely have been better compared to today's world....!!

No difference. Women would get on their PMS wagon once a month and ravage the country side. But men would get their revenge by forcing women to put the toilet seat down. If they resit men on that issue, men wold then never lift it ;)

yes they are less corruptible because thinking they need prostitution to exist is less likely. In a utopia no one would have to sell sex but very perverted woman. In other words maybe the only reason we don't live in a futuristic utopia now is that some people think they need conditions to exist that coerce people to do humiliating things for money. Including a dead end paycheck to paycheck 9-5 job doing useless repetitive things because of a system stacked against you.

Yes. This is because women are smarter than women, and we would have made less stupid decisions (such as starting a war). Not to say that all women would be like this, because some women are as... idiotic? ridiculous? aggrivating?... as men.

First of all thank you for your replies. Its my first time to create such a debate.

Second is that I would also think that nothing would change. Maybe prostitution may be lessened and rape would probably lessened as well.

Deceit does not choose anyone so therefore they may still be subject to civil unrest and conspiracies.