What's worse?
Abortion on demand
Side Score: 2
|
 |
Forcing women into childbirth
Side Score: 2
|
|
|
|
|
1
point
Mandating an injection is worse than both, and you supported it, so no one cares about the left's hypocrisy from that point forward. You gave the world open permission to say screw your body and your choice. Remember? What, you thought we forgot that you bellowed on and on about how our bodily choice didn't mean dick to you? Nah. We didn't forget bro. Side: Abortion on demand
|
Well, if it were the males of the species that had children I'm certain most would run with abortion on demand. Passing legislation which compels women to have an unwanted life form grow inside THEIR bodies and then go through the pains of hell during birth is inhuman barbarity. The ordeal doesn't end with the birth of the unloved and unwelcomed baby as the female will continue to suffer such maladies as postnatal depression, internal trauma and have to find some way of financing the 20 plus year cost of the undesired intruder into her life. Side: Forcing women into childbirth
1
point
OK first in all reality if they didn't want the "risk" of having a child they should of just kept there pants up. second "pains of hell"? women only feel pain when the give birth naturally not in a C-section. third if they didn't have an abortion and they went through the "pains of hell" and gave birth they can just give the baby up for adoption instead of finding a way to finance 20 plus year cost of the "undesired intruder". Side: Abortion on demand
We can call on a quote from Mother Theresa to give voice to the plight of the unwelcomed baby;- ''Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everyone, is I think, a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat''. As the the sanctimonious virtue signallers sit in their Ivory Towers do they ever consider the misery they are advocating? Side: Forcing women into childbirth
|
