CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:36
Arguments:33
Total Votes:41
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 What would make Grenache ban you? (27)

Debate Creator

Grenache(6053) pic



What would make Grenache ban you?

I've never banned anyone and don't intend to ever have to do it.  I believe that is contrary to the reason people come to debate websites.  But if you could imagine a scenario that would make me change my mind what would it be?  What say you?  Use a little imagination.
Add New Argument

I put up nude pics of myself and he didn't ban me. Point of fact? He liked the pics, or at best, wasn't offended by a nude dinosaur.

2 points

Obscene amounts of spam on one of your debates?

Grenache(6053) Clarified
1 point

Maybe. Maybe. Unless it was Spam in a can. ..................

1 point

Would taking secret nude pictures of me and reposting them as Grenacne, like an Anthony Weiner flub up, make me ban you? Mmmm, nah. No. Just the fact you had to look at the pictures while pulling that prank kind of makes me think you already took revenge on yourself.

Foxglove(205) Clarified
1 point

What if someone slighted those you care about, such as your family?

Grenache(6053) Disputed
1 point

"Slighted"? You have to be a lot more graphic than that my friend. It's all just sticks and stones but words will never hurt me - until it gets really really serious. You'd have to start posting social security and cell phone numbers or something, and then I probably wouldn't have to ban you myself, the site administrator would act instead.

What you are doing is what Progressives believe in. A NO FAULT society whereby no matter what a person chooses to say or do, you won't hold them accountable.

They could be vulgar and childish, ruin other's responses to you, etc. etc. and there you are.... a good little progressive that lacks the character and integrity to hold them accountable for their actions. You bring disorder and disruption to a debate site

and you are proud of allowing a debate to be ruined by a lunatic trying to disrupt other's heartfelt posts.

People like you bring deception and vulgarity to a debate site because you allow it. Just as with no fault welfare, people like you hold no one accountable for their actions.

We are all seeing the results of a no fault culture. BROKEN HOMES, SWOLLEN WELFARE ROLES, DEAD UNBORN BABIES FOR ANY REASON UP TO BIRTH, DEAD BEAT FATHERS WALKING AWAY FROM THEIR RESPONSIBILITY AND LEAVING THE TAX PAYER TO RAISE THEIR CHILDREN, ETC.

No one holds them accountable for their choices and actions in life.

Do you think that is a good trait? I think it is a terrible trait. I like people who stand for SOMETHING and are willing to get angry over total idiots who would belittle very important issues. They should be banned when being deceptive or childish idiots.

Tell me what good it does allowing liars to keep spewing lies in a debate site?

The way you see life explains how Progressives will STILL vote for Hillary no matter how corrupt she is.

Cuaroc(8829) Clarified
1 point

Tell me what good it does allowing liars to keep spewing lies in a debate site?

Because it's amusing to read the rants they post.

Grenache(6053) Disputed
1 point

Nope. What I am doing is debating. You should try it sometime.

Lawyers and politicians don't get to censor opposition unless they're not in a real democracy with freedom of expression. Your approach has no place in a society valuing freedom.

Cuaroc(8829) Clarified
0 points

Is this what not responding to Grenache looks like?

1 point

Exactly. If roles were reversed he would ban me for not answering the question.

In the same way you allow idiots to ruin a debate with vulgarity or deception, it is the Left who has such sympathy for bullies in our public schools. You don't want to kick them out of school! You would allow a bully to keep terrorizing other children who want to learn.

Grenache(6053) Disputed
1 point

Nope. I engage in debate. Period. You lecture then censor. That's the difference between us.

FromWithin(8241) Disputed
1 point

You engage in deception along with your other progressive cohorts on my auto ban list. I will always hold people responsibile for their deception.

This is what happens when we hold others to accountability for irresponsibility. THEY GET BETTER AND BECOME MORE RESPONSIBILE! This is obvious human nature that mankind has understood forever, until mindless Progressives infiltrated the media.

cownbueno(407) Disputed
1 point

This is a lot coming from someone who's never actually participated in a real debate on this website? It's just you talking to yourself and banning people who actually want to debate. Then you do the exact same thing that they do and expect an actual intelligent conversation in return.

1 point

Ok. Ok . Hm. A detailed explanation as to wine sucks followed by a video of Tim Curry laughing for an hour....wait that last part is awesome. Hm. Wine sucks?

Grenache(6053) Disputed
1 point

That was a very good try.

But indeed wine DOES SUCK. (But not MY wine. Just yours. Stick around and pay attention and eventually your wine won't suck anymore).

1 point

The urge to ban coupled with a lack of resistance to acting on that urge.

1 point

Who cares ?

Cuaroc(8829) Clarified
2 points

You cared enough to respond.

1 point

Who cares ?

1 point

There is a possible scenario where you would ban a participant.

You accidentally click to ban abusive participants, and someone walks by and clicks to ban a specific person, or you get bumped on the hand and click to ban.

To actually convince you, someone may give you some cash to ban a participant that may not be active anyways and you think it is worth it for the profit you receive.

These are unlikely scenarios but possible.