CreateDebate


Debate Info

6
7
No non-biased media in U.S. Biden can do no harm.
Debate Score:13
Arguments:17
Total Votes:13
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 No non-biased media in U.S. (6)
 
 Biden can do no harm. (6)

Debate Creator

Norwich(525) pic



Where is the media outrage as Biden builds Trump's wall?

The mainstream American media is corrupt, prejudiced and unashamedly biased.
Having winkled their way into the top positions of our long established broadcasting and news publishing institutions the radical leftists and sexual deviants now have total control over our major media corporations and can influence the outcome of elections and sway people's attitudes and acceptance of certain vitally important issues.
THIS DANGEROUS MONOPOLY OF THE MEDIA BY THE LEFTISTS MUST BE CHALLENGED BY USING EVERY LEGAL METHOD AVAILABLE.

No non-biased media in U.S.

Side Score: 6
VS.

Biden can do no harm.

Side Score: 7
1 point

When THE IMBECILE was inaugurated and immediately commenced to demolish the economic and political structures of the United States the predominate media outlets prioritized their LEFT-WING IDEOLOGIES over the well-being of the nation by concealing the self-destructive nature of the Democrat's policies.

WE CAN ONLY MAKE JUDGMENTS ON SUBJECTS ABOUT WHICH WE'RE RELIABLY INFORMED.

OUR COMMUNIST CONTROLLED MEDIA MAKES SURE WE ONLY GET TO HEAR ABOUT WHAT THEY WNAT US TO.

''SUCH IS THE LEFT-WING FILTH''.

Side: No non-biased media in U.S.
1 point

America is in a sorry state, so much so the international press refers to our RADICAL LEFT-WING GOVERNED NATION AS;- THE SORROWFUL STATES OF AMERICA.

MAN, MAN OH MAN, why did we let this happen?

Side: No non-biased media in U.S.
1 point

Biden administration will close gaps in US-Mexico border wall,

OR

Biden is 'building Trump's wall' with no media outrage.

Hello:

One of those statements is true, and the other is not.

excon

Side: No non-biased media in U.S.
Norwich(525) Disputed
1 point

Well, not really.

If you finish building a wall by constructing other walls to adjoin and/or extend an existing structure, or adding to its original dimensions you are building a wall, or walls.

Only a fool would try to argue that by erecting additions to and/or extending an existing wall does not blatantly contradict the declaration;- ''not another foot of wall.

Don't become an IMBECILE by trying to defend THE IMBECILE.

Side: Biden can do no harm.
seanB(950) Clarified
1 point

You're a Trump supporter and Conservative/Republican right? So, the wall was something that you wanted? And now you're getting it fixed up, expanded and the gaps closed, right?

So, isn't that a good thing for you?

I mean, I don't know about you but for example I was not much of a Trump fan when he was in office, but I was thrilled that he was taking China to task on a lot of things towards the end of his Presidency, even if I didn't think he was the best leader, personally.

Is it possible that you prefer the thrill of chasing divisions and criticising "the left" more than you actually want to see the realisation of the policies you support and desire?

And is it also possible that this is a part of the issue to begin with of why the US seems so polarised at the moment?

I don't know about everyone else but I'm pretty exhausted of the "culture war", toxic neomarxism/feminism/identity politics vs science denialism/anti-humanism/religiosity.

Where's the common ground? We've got to all sit down like adult human beings and speak with common sense.

I mean, you're right. Adding pieces to a wall is by definition building a wall. But if that's what you wanted and it saves even one more vitriolic argument, then why be so intent on creating the vitriolic argument? Where is the adult in all of this at this point?

Side: No non-biased media in U.S.
Nicephorus(110) Disputed
1 point

One of those statements is true, and the other is not.

Explain to us the difference between the two sentences there Einstein. We gonna be waiting for an answer for eternity again? Yes, we are. Here's where you vanish because you don't know the fucking difference seeing there isn't one.

Side: Biden can do no harm.
excon(17248) Disputed
1 point

Here's where you vanish because you don't know the fucking difference seeing there isn't one.

Hello hater:

OMG!!! I better answer or you'll think ill of me..

Bwa ha ha ha ha ha.

excon

Side: No non-biased media in U.S.

It's an election year ploy. He'll go through the motions b4 the election, then do nothing afterward. It's just to mitigate the damage before November.

Side: Biden can do no harm.
Norwich(525) Clarified
1 point

Yeah, The term;- ''a damage limitation exercise'' takes on a whole new meaning when it comes to THE IMBECILE'S shambles .

Side: No non-biased media in U.S.
1 point

Note how the media omitted to show Biden scoffing at trump when he caught covid-19.

NOW THE IMBECILE HAS CAUGHT IT TWICE.

Or has he?

Maybe this announcement is only a ruse to keep THE IMBECILE away from the cameras.

Side: Biden can do no harm.
1 point

As THE IMBECILE sits in front of the cameras spewing out his anecdotal childhood experiences and telling us that he was brought up in a middle-class home, his madcap left-wing policies have razed our economy to the ground.

HOW OUR ENEMIES MUST BE CHEERING THE IMBECILE ON.

They will be shouting;- Come on IMBECILE, keep the illegals streaming into your country and accelerate the insolvency of your country.

Don't consider providing your citizens with competitive gas prices by recommissioning your nation's wealth of energy reserves.

That way you'll keep inflation high and cause further dissent among your restless and concerned people.

Our enemies couldn't have asked for a better President than the ''IMBECILE''.

Side: Biden can do no harm.