Which Is More Barbaric/Worse?
Killing An Animal For Someone
Side Score: 3
|
 |
Eating A Animal Someone Killed
Side Score: 1
|
|
|
|
|
2
points
1
point
However, if we apply this scenario to something like a supermarket (i.e. where you pay for the slaughtered animal), it could be argued that eating and therefore paying for a slaughtered animal is more morally incorrect. The reason behind this is by buying an eating the slaughtered animal you are supporting the meat trade, which of course cannot exist without consumers. By supporting the meat trade instead of boycotting meat, you are helping someone kill an animal, since you pay for their salary etc. Without you, the consumer, the animal would not have to die. The consumer is the root reason for the cessation of said animal's life. Side: Eating A Animal Someone Killed
1
point
There is nothing wrong with eating an animal. Humans need to consume both meat and plants in order to have a health life. And seeing as meat contains 9 essencial amino acids that plants (even soy) cannot suppliment, it is only natural that one eats meat. but, you do not have to kill the animal yourself. Buy it at the store, all prepared for you, and leave the guilt behind. Side: Killing An Animal For Someone
|
No arguments found. Add one!
|
