#1 |
#2 |
#3 |
Paste this URL into an email or IM: |
Click here to send this debate via your default email application.
|
Click here to login and CreateDebate will send an email for you.
|
Which country is better?
USA
Side Score: 109
|
 |
Russia
Side Score: 97
|
|
1
point
|
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
The idea of trying to discuss how two machines with classified specifications would fare makes no sense. Side: USA
1
point
1
point
You still haven't learned to stop letting me decide. Asking you what is your own opinion is giving you the control that you should have. Not the control that you try to have. The Abrams would win that fight every day and twice on Sunday. The Abrams isn't as powerful as people make it out to be. You do realise how many Abrams that the Americans have lost? The Abrams isn't that good, they have lost about 4,000 tanks in the past. We have only lost about 2/3 challenger 2 tanks and have lost none of our Challenger 1's. So the Abrams is definitely inferior to the Challenger 2. But what for the T-14 Armata or the T-90AM? Those tanks are not bad at all. Their new reflekt (that's foreign) explosive reactive armour is actually quite strong, which is in front of a firm, thick base on composite armour. The Abrams may have Chobham armour, but not the second generation of Chobham that the British use (the British use Dorchester), the USA just use an improved version of the original Chobham armour (Burlington). Side: Russia
1
point
Anyone who does will find that the United States is technologically superior both in terms of domestic technological applications and military applications. On top of that, we have a larger pool of active personnel and a substantially higher military budget. Have you done any research on this topic? Side: USA
1
point
Anyone who does will find that the United States is technologically superior both in terms of domestic technological applications and military applications. On top of that, we have a larger pool of active personnel and a substantially higher military budget. Have you done any research on this topic? Russia is technologically advanced both in terms of agricultural laboratory practices and military equipment. Russia has a larger base of alert soldiers and a substantially cutting military sharehold. Side: Russia
1
point
Russia is technologically advanced both in terms of agricultural laboratory practices and military equipment. In both cases they are less technologically advanced than the United States. Outside of agriculture we are still far beyond Russia in technological advancement. Russia has a larger base of alert soldiers and a substantially cutting military sharehold. Actually they don't. Russia has the 5th largest active pool at 845,000. We are second at 1.5 million. As for "a substantially cutting military sharehold", that combination of words does not result in any actual meaning. If you wrongfully phrased what you meant, feel free to try again. But you might want to check up on your facts before doing so. Side: USA
1
point
In both cases they are less technologically advanced than the United States. Outside of agriculture we are still far beyond Russia in technological advancement. Where is your proof! I love it when you use lexicological alchemy! Actually they don't. Russia has the 5th largest active pool at 845,000. We are second at 1.5 million. As for "a substantially cutting military sharehold", that combination of words does not result in any actual meaning. If you wrongfully phrased what you meant, feel free to try again. But you might want to check up on your facts before doing so. Any math behind this stuff? Oh, I see, more of your lexicological alchemy and word games! Clever man! Side: Russia
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
2
points
Aside from the fact that your sentence does not make any sense grammatically speaking, I am wondering what you have seen that leads you to hold the opinion that Russia is more economically stable than the United States. Deflecting to a grammatically nonsensical "I know you are but what am I" doesn't answer it. As for the facts, our financial sector is more powerful, our technological sector is more powerful, our revenue is vastly above theirs, our foreign economic partnerships are so far beyond theirs (the sanctions have really hurt them), our currency vastly outweighs theirs, our average household income is vastly beyond theirs, etc. I could go on. So. What makes you think that Russia is somehow more economically secure than the United States? Side: USA
1
point
Aside from the fact that your sentence does not make any sense grammatically speaking, I am wondering what you have seen that leads you to hold the opinion that Russia is more economically stable than the United States. Russia's banking system is more piercing, their scientific unit is more devastating, their savings is noticeable atop of theirs, their international banking union is so far beyond theirs (the sanctions have really prevented them), the USA currency vastly outweighs itself, their average family income is intriguingly scaling theirs, etc. Side: Russia
1
point
1
point
2
points
1
point
1
point
And again, this is why people call you a troll. If you reject that characterization, then take part in an actual conversation. But so long as you say things like "Russia's banking system is more piercing, their scientific unit is more devastating, their savings is noticeable atop of theirs, their international banking union is so far beyond theirs (the sanctions have really prevented them), the USA currency vastly outweighs itself, their average family income is intriguingly scaling theirs, etc.", then you won't be taken seriously. Side: USA
1
point
And again, this is why people call you a troll. If you reject that characterization, then take part in an actual conversation. But so long as you say things like "Russia's banking system is more piercing, their scientific unit is more devastating, their savings is noticeable atop of theirs, their international banking union is so far beyond theirs (the sanctions have really prevented them), the USA currency vastly outweighs itself, their average family income is intriguingly scaling theirs, etc.", then you won't be taken seriously. Don't you believe that Russia has good military equipment? Side: Russia
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
No wonder you can't answer questions. You don't even know when someone answers the question. You didn't answer my question. I didn't think you did, the guy who wrote the argument that you didn't address doesn't think you did. Why do you think that is? That is because he's tired, or stressed. Side: Russia
You didn't answer my question. You gave me a multiple choice question, and I gave you one of the possible answers. The question was answered. You now want an answer to the question "why?", but that would be a new question. That is because he's tired, or stressed. Yep, always someone else with the problem. Side: USA
1
point
You gave me a multiple choice question, and I gave you one of the possible answers. The question was answered. You now want an answer to the question "why?", but that would be a new question. That's incredibly dishonest. I didn't ask you a multiple choice question. I had asked you an open question. The original question was why (open question) I didn't ask a multiple choice nor duel choice question. Although you had implied that I had asked a duel choice question, now you are claiming that I had asked a multiple choice question, you contradict yourself. Liar. Let's Scrutinise! Side: Russia
That's incredibly dishonest. No, it isn't. I answered your fucking question. I didn't ask you a multiple choice question. What the fuck. Yes you did. "Who has better military hardware? Russia or the USA?" That is a multiple choice question. I had asked you an open question. What the fuck is an open question? The original question was why (open question) Bullshit. I didn't ask a multiple choice nor duel choice question. Yes you fucking did, you dishonest sff. Although you had implied that I had asked a duel choice question, No, your duel choice fucking question implied that you asked a duel choice question you dsff. now you are claiming that I had asked a multiple choice question, you contradict yourself. Multiple means more than one you complete fucking asshole. Liar. Fuck you. Let's Scrutinise! You should stop that. You are incredibly bad at it. Side: USA
1
point
No, it isn't. I answered your fucking question. No, this time just no. I've changed my mind, just this time for once, please let's just be serious. What the fuck. Yes you did. "Who has better military hardware? Russia or the USA?" That is a multiple choice question. That wasn't the question that we were talking about. I had asked why afterwards. "Why" was the question that we were actually referring to. "Why" was not the question that came after the one that we were just discussing. Side: Russia
1
point
No, it isn't. I answered your fucking question. No, this time just no. I've changed my mind, just this time for once, please let's just be serious. What the fuck. Yes you did. "Who has better military hardware? Russia or the USA?" That is a multiple choice question. That wasn't the question that we were talking about. I had asked why afterwards. "Why" was the question that we were actually referring to. "Why" was not the question that came after the one that we were just discussing. "Why" was the question that we were discussing. What the fuck is an open question? Bloody hell. What country do you actually come from (open question)? Have you ever heard of an open or a closed question before (closed question)? God. Yes you fucking did, you dishonest sff. One would think you called me an sff affectionately at this rate. You like to calling me a fucking like, don't you? I really am not sure whether I should or shouldn't take this tripe seriously or not. Multiple means more than one you complete fucking asshole. No, it means more than two in most cases. Fuck you. I feel like my time is being wasted. You should stop that. You are incredibly bad at it. This is really boring. Can't we just start afresh? Let's just forget the past, ok. Side: Russia
I've changed my mind, just this time for once No, it is not the first time you have changed your mind. That wasn't the question that we were talking about. Wrong again. I had asked why afterwards. Yeah, after you accused me of not answering the question. "Why" was the question that we were actually referring to. No it wasn't. "Why" was not the question that came after the one that we were just discussing. You just said it came afterwards. "Why" was the question that we were discussing. Again, you just saying it doesn't make it true. What country do you actually come from (open question)? So, you are saying that I could have answered that India was the greater country between USA and Russia? Context, asshole. One would think you called me an sff affectionately at this rate. Only an sff would. You like to calling me a fucking like, don't you? No, I don't like it. But, I am truthful, so I can't stop. I really am not sure whether I should or shouldn't take this tripe seriously or not. I suggest you do the opposite of what you think you should do since you are always wrong. No, it means more than two in most cases. Fuck you. By definition it means more than 1. The fact that even you aren't stupid enough to fucking claim that it isn't more than 2 all the time should have clued you in. I feel like my time is being wasted. How do you think I feel? Let's just forget the past, ok. Sure. I have no doubt that you will continue doing the same things and I will continue to call you out on it. I just won't add "like always". Side: USA
1
point
No, it is not the first time you have changed your mind. Taking it out of context, you're right. Putting it in context, you're wrong. Wrong again. When you say wrong, it might as well become a swear word for you to use. Yeah, after you accused me of not answering the question. I had asked "why" before I had accused you. I asked why you believed what you did about the USA and China, before I accused you of not answering it. No it wasn't. No it wasn't. Really? So I was asking "when" or "where" or "how" or "what" instead, now was I? You just said it came afterwards. The question we were referring to was definitely "why". Don't worry, this time I didn't make a typo, I didn't spell it as "y". Again, you just saying it doesn't make it true. Any quotations? So, you are saying that I could have answered that India was the greater country between USA and Russia? Context, asshole. You're statement suggests that I was asking "which". I was asking "why". I had asked "why" you believed the USA was greater. We already knew that you believed that the USA was greater, so the "which" was ruled out. I wanted to know "why". You answered the first question, but not the one we were referring to now. There was no question after the one we were referring to now. The one we were referring to now was the second question. Only an sff would. Why would you hate someone that you are trying to help? No, I don't like it. But, I am truthful, so I can't stop. Why don't you like it? I suggest you do the opposite of what you think you should do since you are always wrong. You're trying to push me into doing that. Yeah, I get it. I'm not wrong though. Fuck you. By definition it means more than 1. The fact that even you aren't stupid enough to fucking claim that it isn't more than 2 all the time should have clued you in. Multiple means at least one more than the standard amount. The standard amount is more than two. In most cases (contexts) it is more than two, since in most cases the standard amount is two. That is why we have lots of words created that feature the word "bi". Since bi is usually the standard amount. Now go ride that bicycle, it will help deal with the stress! How do you think I feel? Cross that you aren't getting what you want? Sure. I have no doubt that you will continue doing the same things and I will continue to call you out on it. I just won't add "like always". It's good exercise for your brain, you will thank me afterwards. Side: Russia
Taking it out of context, you're right. Putting it in context, you're wrong. You have made it abundantly clear that you don't understand context. I had asked "why" before I had accused you. No, you didn't. We can scroll up and verify your bullshit claims. I asked why you believed what you did about the USA and China, before I accused you of not answering it. Why the fuck are we talking about China now? I had asked "why" you believed the USA was greater. YOU DID NOT ASK WHY IN THE QUESTIONS I QUOTED!!!!!!!!!!!!! You answered the first question I WIN I WIN I WIN I WIN. You just admitted you have been wrong this whole fucking time. Boom fucker. Why would you hate someone that you are trying to help? Because he won't accept the much needed help. Why don't you like it? Because if I am using that kind of language that means I am dealing with a stupid forgetful fucko. You wouldn't even want to deal with you. I'm not wrong though. You are. Multiple means at least one more than the standard amount. The standard amount is more than two. So, now you are claiming that multiple only means 4 or more. You were so close. You said something that may have been right. Why would you say something this stupid? Now go ride that bicycle, it will help deal with the stress! What stress? Why would I come here if you weren't super entertaining? It's good exercise for your brain, you will thank me afterwards. I will thank you when you finally admit you are wrong. Side: USA
1
point
You have made it abundantly clear that you don't understand context. How come? No, you didn't. We can scroll up and verify your bullshit claims. Yeah right. Why the fuck are we talking about China now? Because that was the original statement. That was the second question, the one you didn't answer, the one we were talking about. There was no question after that. You pretended that there was. YOU DID NOT ASK WHY IN THE QUESTIONS I QUOTED!!!!!!!!!!!!! You quoted the right question. Why are you saying you haven't? I WIN I WIN I WIN I WIN. You just admitted you have been wrong this whole fucking time. Boom fucker. You answered the first question I had ever asked, but not the second one. You didn't answer the question after the one that we were originally talking about, because there wasn't anyway. Btw, you're wording should have been third question, not second. Because he won't accept the much needed help. What if it was your own son? Lack of empathy, again. Because if I am using that kind of language that means I am dealing with a stupid forgetful fucko. You wouldn't even want to deal with you. So you admit that you don't care about me, then? You are. Oh whatever. So, now you are claiming that multiple only means 4 or more. You were so close. You said something that may have been right. Why would you say something this stupid? I meant to say that the standard amount is two, not more than two. It's only a typo. What stress? Why would I come here if you weren't super entertaining? If I am entertaining, that means you actually like me. I will thank you when you finally admit you are wrong. So you're brain isn't being exercised until I admit that I am wrong? How come? If I never admit that I am wrong, are you implying that I am to blame for your brain not being exercised? Side: Russia
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
Just say "Yes, Cartman, I wasn't talking about America or Russia when I said you don't know how to use adjectives" But that wouldn't be the complete truth would it? When you replied to a post I had made about Russia and America you clearly didn't know how to respond. Side: Russia
But that wouldn't be the complete truth would it? The statement would be 100% accurate. You would say it if you wanted to be right. When you replied to a post I had made about Russia and America you clearly didn't know how to respond. That wouldn't be the complete truth would it? Side: USA
1
point
The statement would be 100% accurate. You would say it if you wanted to be right. No, it wouldn't be. You are assuming that you knew what I was talking about. Are you sure you would admit to that? I don't think you would. That wouldn't be the complete truth would it? The complete truth is that you jumped the gun and had assumed what I was saying. Side: Russia
1
point
What part of the statement is inaccurate? That means which part of the statement says something wrong. Before I can address your bullshit argument about it being incomplete I will need to address your bullshit argument about which part is wrong. I'm surprised, you can do better than this. I was right to say that when we were talking about Russia and America, you didn't which adjectives you should have used to describe them. Want me to elaborate? I will. Ask, NICELY. Side: Russia
Can't answer the question. Not surprised. I was right to say that when we were talking about Russia and America, you didn't which adjectives you should have used to describe them. Hey, you forgot a word again. I of course disagree with your statement. Want me to elaborate? I will. Ask, NICELY. Please elaborate kind sir. Side: USA
1
point
Can't answer the question. Not surprised. I already did answer it, successfully. Hey, you forgot a word again. I of course disagree with your statement. What word did you think I had missed out? Obviously you're brain failed to fill in the sentence with the word "state". "I of course". Am I supposed to place in the words "did", "then", or "obviously"? Whichever x? I _ inserted, it wouldn't have changed the message you would have been trying to get across. Please elaborate kind sir. Thank you. OK, I will. It is the quantitative and the qualitive adjectives you used to describe Russia and the USA. Side: Russia
I already did answer it, successfully. Yes, but you won't admit that your answer was that the statement was 100% accurate. So, since you admit that the statement is 100% accurate, you can say it and be honest. What word did you think I had missed out? Obviously you're brain failed to fill in the sentence with the word "state". I love how you asked me which word you left out directly before you admitted to leaving out a word. Then blamed me for it. Am I supposed to place in the words "did", "then", or "obviously"? There is no need to insert any words. I wrote a complete sentence, just keep reading. It is the quantitative and the qualitive adjectives you used to describe Russia and the USA. Which quantitative and qualitative adjectives are you referring to? Side: USA
1
point
Yes, but you won't admit that your answer was that the statement was 100% accurate. So, since you admit that the statement is 100% accurate, you can say it and be honest. I can't admit that IamSparticus was 100% accurate, because it wasn't. You should stop lying. I love how you asked me which word you left out directly before you admitted to leaving out a word. Then blamed me for it. When did I blame you for when I had missed a word out? I had blamed you for not being able to figure out what type of missing word I used was. It was only the word "of" which was placed before the word "the". Can that be all that hard? There is no need to insert any words. I wrote a complete sentence, just keep reading. I never said that you hadn't definitely written all the words that you had intended to write. I asked whether or not you did. Get it right. Which quantitative and qualitative adjectives are you referring to? Definitely, wrong, best, obviously, great, economic, financial. Their Examples. Side: Russia
I can't admit that IamSparticus was 100% accurate, because it wasn't. You should stop lying. My statement, you dumb shit. Why the fuck would you be talking about his statement? When did I blame you for when I had missed a word out? Every single time I told you about it. I had blamed you for not being able to figure out what type of missing word I used was. Same difference. You left out a word and claimed I did something wrong. It was only the word "of" which was placed before the word "the". Can that be all that hard? You can't even read when all the words are there. I never said that you hadn't definitely written all the words that you had intended to write. Context fucker. Why the fuck are you adding words to what I wrote when I wrote down everything I intended to write? I asked whether or not you did. Get it right. Bullshit, you fucking liar. Definitely, wrong, best, obviously, great, economic, financial. Ha. Those were used correctly. Their Examples. Correction: There Side: USA
1
point
My statement, you dumb shit. Why the fuck would you be talking about his statement? You used the word "his". Not "yours". Pronouns are important, Cartman. Every single time I told you about it. Any quotations? Same difference. You left out a word and claimed I did something wrong. I claimed that we both did something wrong. I'm losing my temper. You can't even read when all the words are there. That depends upon a lot of factors. For a start, you have failed to prove that I am always wrong. Context fucker. Why the fuck are you adding words to what I wrote when I wrote down everything I intended to write? You're intention had changed. Bullshit, you fucking liar. Lol. Ha. Those were used correctly. Bullshit, you fucking liar. My point is... Correction: There I make typo's often. I write too fast I think. Side: Russia
1
point
My statement, you dumb shit. Why the fuck would you be talking about his statement? You used the word "his". Not "yours". Pronouns are important, Cartman. Every single time I told you about it. Any quotations? Same difference. You left out a word and claimed I did something wrong. I claimed that we both did something wrong. I'm losing my temper. You can't even read when all the words are there. That depends upon a lot of factors. For a start, you have failed to prove that I am always wrong. Context fucker. Why the fuck are you adding words to what I wrote when I wrote down everything I intended to write? You're intention had changed. Bullshit, you fucking liar. Lol. Ha. Those were used correctly. Bullshit, you fucking liar. My point is... Correction: There I make typo's often. I write too fast I think. Side: Russia
1
point
My statement, you dumb shit. Why the fuck would you be talking about his statement? You used the word "his". Not "yours". Pronouns are important, Cartman. Every single time I told you about it. Any quotations? Same difference. You left out a word and claimed I did something wrong. I claimed that we both did something wrong. I'm losing my temper. You can't even read when all the words are there. That depends upon a lot of factors. For a start, you have failed to prove that I am always wrong. Context fucker. Why the fuck are you adding words to what I wrote when I wrote down everything I intended to write? You're intention had changed. Bullshit, you fucking liar. Lol. Ha. Those were used correctly. Bullshit, you fucking liar. My point is... Correction: There I make typo's often. I write too fast I think. Side: Russia
You used the word "his". Not "yours". Pronouns are important, Cartman. I know they are important, that's why I want you to learn how to use them. I never said "his". "The statement would be 100% accurate. " "What part of the statement is inaccurate?" "Yes, but you won't admit that your answer was that the statement was 100% accurate." the the the. No "his". Any quotations? Do you deny doing it every time, or do you deny doing it ever? I claimed that we both did something wrong. I'm losing my temper. Well, only 1 of us did anything wrong. That depends upon a lot of factors. For a start, you have failed to prove that I am always wrong. I disagree. You're intention had changed. The context shows you are wrong, and I have directly told you my intention didn't change. I write too fast I think. Wow. You aren't pushing it on me. Finally. Side: USA
1
point
I know they are important, that's why I want you to learn how to use them. I never said "his". So you admit to caring now? Why do you change your stance often? You said you didn't care, at first. "Yes, but you won't admit that your answer was that the statement was 100% accurate." the the the. No "his". If my statement is 100% accurate, then IamSparticus's isn't. Since you're saying I can't admit to that means that you believe I am lying. You were basically saying that I was wrong and that IamSparticus's statement is 100% as opposed to mine. So yes, there is a "his". Do you deny doing it every time, or do you deny doing it ever? I deny ever blaming as soon as I missed a word out. I only blamed you for blaming me. So I didn't blame you when I had missed a word out. Context, remember. Well, only 1 of us did anything wrong. It's you who likes being wrong, not me. It's you who likes being aggressive, not me. I disagree. You may disagree, but at least I digress. The context shows you are wrong, and I have directly told you my intention didn't change. Then you are lying. Wow. You aren't pushing it on me. Finally. Pushing which one on you? The fact that I made a typo, or the fact that you didn't think I had? Side: Russia
So you admit to caring now? Why do you change your stance often? You said you didn't care, at first. None of that had anything to do with caring. Why are you twisting my words instead of admitting I didn't use the word "his"? If my statement is 100% accurate, then IamSparticus's isn't. No one gives 2 shits about your statements because they are all bullshit. Pay attention fucker. I quoted myself over the course of the debate showing I never used the word "his". Stop pretending it has anything to do with you. So yes, there is a "his". You are incapable of admitting a simple fact. I only blamed you for blaming me. You blamed yourself you stupid asshole. Why the fuck should I be chastised for also blaming you? The fact that I made a typo, or the fact that you didn't think I had? The fact that you made a typo. You didn't try to blame me for anything. It's refreshing. Side: USA
1
point
None of that had anything to do with caring. Why are you twisting my words instead of admitting I didn't use the word "his"? Why would you want me to learn anything if you don't care? No one gives 2 shits about your statements because they are all bullshit. Pay attention fucker. I quoted myself over the course of the debate showing I never used the word "his". Stop pretending it has anything to do with you. You said that I don't want to admit that my comment was 100% accurate. You also said that I didn't want to admit that IamSparticus's statements were 100%. You believe that I am confused therefore. You admitted to this. I never said that you used the word "his". So piss off you pile of shit. You had said that the word "his" applies. You're a sham, bastard. You blamed yourself you stupid asshole. Why the fuck should I be chastised for also blaming you? You didn't blame me of the same thing that I blamed myself of. You blamed me for something else. The fact that you made a typo. You didn't try to blame me for anything. It's refreshing. I had blamed you primarily for not understanding what I had wrote. Do you get it now? I didn't blame you for my fingers slipping. Side: Russia
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
Just because I didn't add "without the fucking sass" doesn't mean you should have given me fucking sass when you fucked up. Did you know that there was an experiment where humans had to read a piece of text where the letters of each word were twisted round? Did you know that the average persons brain was still able to fit together what each word actually was within the sentence? You only had trouble with there not being a two letter word "of" before "the". What's your excuse? Side: Russia
1
point
Where is the experiment where assholes forget fucking words? Just admit you made a fucking mistake without attacking the person who noticed. Why are you using the word "fucking assholes"? Shut up with calling people assholes for a start. I have an example here: May not be the best, but it will do for now. Side: Russia
1
point
1
point
1
point
It is lazy of you because it is my job? Why would it make you lazy if it is my job? The original word wasn't lazy. Your original character that you had displayed indicated one of thankfulness. So therefore your word was "nice" of or "good" of. You need to stop changing your character. Stop changing your stance. Anyway, next time try removing the word "of" from your posts like I did. If you remove a function word, one can still figure out what the other person is saying. Side: Russia
The original word wasn't lazy. Yes it was. That's what I was trying to convey. I think I would know better than you. Your original character that you had displayed indicated one of thankfulness. When the hell have I ever indicated any kind of thankfulness to you? So therefore your word was "nice" of or "good" of. So, you agree that you were wrong about people leaving out words. If I leave out words you can't figure out what I said. Stop changing your stance. So, you couldn't figure out my stance when I left out a word. Excellent. Study complete. Anyway, next time try removing the word "of" from your posts like I did. It is my study, you lazy fuck. If you remove a function word, one can still figure out what the other person is saying. No, I just proved that if I remove a function word you can't figure out what I was saying. Side: USA
1
point
Yes it was. That's what I was trying to convey. I think I would know better than you. You do know what you were trying to convey better and you know that the word wasn't lazy, originally. When the hell have I ever indicated any kind of thankfulness to you? For my responses to you. You do try to act thankful for my responses. So, you agree that you were wrong about people leaving out words. If I leave out words you can't figure out what I said. I can figure out what you had said, due to context. I am right about context and I am right about leaving out words. So, you couldn't figure out my stance when I left out a word. Excellent. Study complete. I could figure it out. I figured it out to such an extent that I knew when you were changing your stance. Does it suck that I can tell when you're lying? It is my study, you lazy fuck. So you conduct a study that is biased? No, it's my study, I asked for you to collect the evidence for my study. No, I just proved that if I remove a function word you can't figure out what I was saying. I find that incredibly amusing. Read the full post Side: Russia
The original word wasn't lazy. Yes it was. That's what I was trying to convey. I think I would know better than you. Your original character that you had displayed indicated one of thankfulness. When the hell have I ever indicated any kind of thankfulness to you? So therefore your word was "nice" of or "good" of. So, you agree that you were wrong about people leaving out words. If I leave out words you can't figure out what I said. Stop changing your stance. So, you couldn't figure out my stance when I left out a word. Excellent. Study complete. Anyway, next time try removing the word "of" from your posts like I did. It is my study, you lazy fuck. If you remove a function word, one can still figure out what the other person is saying. No, I just proved that if I remove a function word you can't figure out what I was saying. Side: USA
1
point
Yes it was. That's what I was trying to convey. I think I would know better than you. You do know what you were trying to convey better and you know that the word wasn't lazy, originally. When the hell have I ever indicated any kind of thankfulness to you? For my responses to you. You do try to act thankful for my responses. So, you agree that you were wrong about people leaving out words. If I leave out words you can't figure out what I said. I can figure out what you had said, due to context. I am right about context and I am right about leaving out words. So, you couldn't figure out my stance when I left out a word. Excellent. Study complete. I could figure it out. I figured it out to such an extent that I knew when you were changing your stance. Does it suck that I can tell when you're lying? It is my study, you lazy fuck. So you conduct a study that is biased? No, it's my study, I asked for you to collect the evidence for my study. No, I just proved that if I remove a function word you can't figure out what I was saying. I find that incredibly amusing. Read the full post Side: Russia
You do know what you were trying to convey better and you know that the word wasn't lazy, originally. I absolutely wrote that statement with the word lazy in it and simply deleted the lazy. For my responses to you. You do try to act thankful for my responses. Dumb and delusional is a terrible combination. I can figure out what you had said, due to context. I have proof that you couldn't. I am right about context and I am right about leaving out words. You are trying to convince me that you know what I wrote better than I do. That is you clearly failing to understand context and sentences with missing words. I could figure it out. You can't even figure it out now that I told you what the missing word was. I figured it out to such an extent that I knew when you were changing your stance. Yep, you are so honest you won't even let the truth change your mind. Does it suck that I can tell when you're lying? That would make you some kind of idiot savant. Thankfully, you can't, so I don't have to worry about it. So you conduct a study that is biased? Yes, it was biased. The study was only done on a troll. I can't be too sure that the results can be translated to humans. No, it's my study, I asked for you to collect the evidence for my study. Ooooooooooooooooooooooh. No wonder you are trying so desperately to fake the results. It makes so much sense now. You could have saved yourself so much trouble by finding someone who believed what you believed to gather the evidence. Your study is a failure. I find that incredibly amusing. We all find your study failing to be amusing. We are surprised you do too. Side: USA
1
point
I absolutely wrote that statement with the word lazy in it and simply deleted the lazy. Then you should have not wrote the word lazy. Glad you deleted it. Dumb and delusional is a terrible combination. Now you have stopped acting thankfully. I have proof that you couldn't. Even more proof that I can. You are trying to convince me that you know what I wrote better than I do. That is you clearly failing to understand context and sentences with missing words. Incorrect. I understand most of the words you use. Get it right. You can't even figure it out now that I told you what the missing word was. I could figure it out. And it wasn't lazy. You lied. But the original word wasn't "lied". But it wasn't "truth" either. Yep, you are so honest you won't even let the truth change your mind. Then that wouldn't be honesty, would it? That would make you some kind of idiot savant. Thankfully, you can't, so I don't have to worry about it. You said I was good at twisting round words. Therefore you made it out like I was an idiot savant. Yes, it was biased. The study was only done on a troll. I can't be too sure that the results can be translated to humans. The study is biased because of the way the results were garnered. You're study is blind to a lot of factors. Therefore your hypothesis about me were incorrect. Also, can you prove that I'm a troll. I am human. Ooooooooooooooooooooooh. No wonder you are trying so desperately to fake the results. It makes so much sense now. You could have saved yourself so much trouble by finding someone who believed what you believed to gather the evidence. Your study is a failure. The evidence is to prove whether you are honest. The experiment is not based on whether or people are honest. It's all about you. We all find your study failing to be amusing. We are surprised you do too. "We"? There's just you. I see, you fail to find my study amusing. Clearly you do not find me amusing. Why are you posting to me then? Side: Russia
1
point
1
point
1
point
You didn't know I would treat you like an asshole by default, since I didn't. You came on here acting like an asshole to see who would treat you normal even though you are acting like an asshole. First off, I didn't start off acting like an asshole towards anyone. You had acted like an asshole towards me constantly, which means by default, since you came to me acting like the asshole. Even TrumpsHair had told you that your persistence indicated some sort of personal issue. Just don't get so hooked up over words. I'm just trying to be friendly here. Take my word. Side: Russia
First off, I didn't start off acting like an asshole towards anyone. Yes, you did. You had acted like an asshole towards me constantly, which means by default, since you came to me acting like the asshole. I already explained why I did. I didn't realize it was a test to see who would accept you being an asshole without telling you. Even TrumpsHair had told you that your persistence indicated some sort of personal issue. Yeah. Dealing with assholes is an indication of issues. I'm just trying to be friendly here. I don't think what you are doing could be considered friendly by anyone. Side: USA
1
point
Yes, you did. Who did I act like an asshole towards? I already explained why I did. You're explanation was false. So now you admit that by default you were acting like an asshole towards me? This is an example of you constantly changing your stance. I didn't realize it was a test to see who would accept you being an asshole without telling you. You can't realise something that isn't true. You were acting like an asshole towards me, you had just admitted this, so you weren't simply just telling me that I was an asshole. Even if you were telling me that I was an asshole, you shouldn't act like an asshole yourself as your means to prove it to me, unless you wanted to act like what you accuse others of. Can't you see that I don't need to be told that I'm something that I'm not? Yeah. Dealing with assholes is an indication of issues. You haven't been dealing with assholes. You have been growling at an innocent person. You don't think that I can change, so why spend time trying to work on me? I don't think what you are doing could be considered friendly by anyone. Of course. You're excuse for this is that you think I don't have a personality. If I don't have a personality, then I can't be friendly. Sadly, I do have a personality, so I am being friendly. Side: Russia
Who did I act like an asshole towards? Anyone who decided to read your arguments. So now you admit that by default you were acting like an asshole towards me? This is an example of you constantly changing your stance. You are hilarious. You were acting like an asshole towards me, you had just admitted this, so you weren't simply just telling me that I was an asshole. You think that means I was being an asshole. Now you are claiming that just calling someone an asshole is not being an asshole? Even if you were telling me that I was an asshole, you shouldn't act like an asshole yourself as your means to prove it to me, I didn't. That's solely your opinion. You think speaking the truth makes someone an asshole. Can't you see that I don't need to be told that I'm something that I'm not? Can you admit anything negative about yourself other than you make typos? You don't think that I can change, so why spend time trying to work on me? Good point. Why do you keep spending time trying to work on me? Of course. You're excuse for this is that you think I don't have a personality. If I don't have a personality, then I can't be friendly. Sadly, I do have a personality, so I am being friendly. What exactly is friendly about accusing me of thinking you have no personality? Side: USA
1
point
Anyone who decided to read your arguments. Can you provide any examples of these people? You are hilarious. I hope this is an act of kindness. You think that means I was being an asshole. Now you are claiming that just calling someone an asshole is not being an asshole? You did more than just calling me an asshole. You lied about me. I didn't. That's solely your opinion. You think speaking the truth makes someone an asshole. But you hadn't spoken the truth. Me: Right. You: Wrong. Me: Right. You: Wrong. See the cycle? You love cycles. Why not take it out on the pavement, with your bicycle? Can you admit anything negative about yourself other than you make typos? I bet you think I shouldn't be allowed to breath. Good point. Why do you keep spending time trying to work on me? I wasn't working on you. What exactly is friendly about accusing me of thinking you have no personality? It means I am being honest. I am being a friend to you by sticking to the truth, as opposed to lying to you. Side: Russia
I hope this is an act of kindness. Of course it isn't. You did more than just calling me an asshole. You lied about me. Neither of those statements is accurate. I bet you think I shouldn't be allowed to breath. Of course you shouldn't be allowed to breath. You can't answer simple questions. You are a drain on society. You are a terrible person. It means I am being honest. You can't even be honest about your own thoughts. What makes you think you can get mine right? I am being a friend to you by sticking to the truth, as opposed to lying to you. Are you being a terrible friend, or are you just too dumb to know what the truth is? Side: USA
1
point
Of course it isn't. Therefore you don't care for me. Neither of those statements is accurate. Honest? Of course you shouldn't be allowed to breath. You can't answer simple questions. You are a drain on society. You are a terrible person. So you don't care about me. Do you have empathy? You can't even be honest about your own thoughts. What makes you think you can get mine right? You can't even be honest about your own thoughts. What makes you think you can get mine right? Projection. Are you being a terrible friend, or are you just too dumb to know what the truth is? Why are you insulting you're friends? Side: Russia
1
point
"Russia's banking system is more piercing, their scientific unit is more devastating, their savings is noticeable atop of theirs, their international banking union is so far beyond theirs (the sanctions have really prevented them), the USA currency vastly outweighs itself, their average family income is intriguingly scaling theirs, etc." You have no authority or legitimacy when attempting to discuss grammar with others. Side: USA
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
Thank you for admitting you were wrong and not blaming typos. I blame both myself an the typos. What is different is what I blame myself of. I don't blame myself of being grammatically incompetent. I blame myself of making a tiny slip up in my coordination of pressing the key. You're point? What exactly gave you the idea that I care about you thinking I am judgmental? You never gave me a reason to think you didn't care, for a start. Liars always care. You're too brazen. Side: USA
I blame both myself an the typos. I haven't seen it. You're point? You blame other people for having problems reading your typos. If you really did blame yourself for your typos I would expect more of an apology. Liars always care. Do you care if I think you are judgmental? Side: Russia
1
point
I haven't seen it. It is if you understood both the context and the words. You blame other people for having problems reading your typos. If you really did blame yourself for your typos I would expect more of an apology. I don't need to apologise if the person was able to read my typos. I blame myself for making a typo. I don't blame myself for you pretending that you were unable to read it. Do you care if I think you are judgmental? I do, but not for my own sake. Liars care about what other people think because for their own sake. Honest people care about what other people think for other peoples sake. You care due to the former. You were denying that you cared for either the former or the latter. If you deny that you cared for any of the reasons you are a liar. If you denied caring for the former, then you are liar. Side: USA
It is if you understood both the context and the words. I will keep a look out for that then. I don't need to apologise if the person was able to read my typos. I know, you asshole. You need to apologize because people weren't able to read with your typos. I don't blame myself for you pretending that you were unable to read it. I wasn't pretending. Side: Russia
1
point
1
point
1
point
Oh man. He is so insanely delusional. He is seeking attention from people that have pledged to not give him any while claiming he isn't a troll. That's like textbook trolling. Well, isn't seeking attention normal in a conversation? I couldn't have a discussion unless I sought attention. It isn't hard to think about. Not that I demand attention from you nor IamSparticus. Side: USA
1
point
1
point
1
point
Don't bother, Cartman's downright masochistic. I've tried to convince him, for his own good, to stop trying with SaintNow and Blizzard, but he's a stubborn one. What does he want out of me, exactly? That's what I just don't get. I wouldn't say I'm like Saintnow though. Blithering heck, Saintnow is dumb. So is FromWithin. I don't bother with them to. Side: USA
1
point
Please Cartman, ignore this guy, it's been too long now, and everyone else has left this debate, I'm asking you for your sanity and health, because I care about my allies. Don't listen or respond to this troll anymore (on this debate). Let's move on Well, everybody does leave debates whenever Cartman responds to me. I get you're point about him. I have been asking him to just give it all a rest as well. Not that I'm a troll. Side: USA
1
point
|
