I can't tell if the other arguments are poor until a good argument is made against it...so the logical choice is this side. :D

I'd change, still waiting to see a good argument. Poor arguments aren't convincing enough.

I am convincible as hard as it may be.

Good, rational, argumentation with verifiable facts has the best chance with me.

A poor argument for my side doesn't really mean a damn thing to me if I know that better arguments for it exist.

Well it would be the good arguments and this is because when you are debating you want to prove your point and get people on your side. The way for you to be able to do this is only if you have a good argument then you can win people to your side. So if someone makes a good enough argument then i would turn to their side.

Good arguments would definitely make me rethink my point of view ;I don't look for points ,I look for reasoning and validity in the arguments,which if I see on the opposite side,I would rethink my point .

Pretty much nothing is going to make me rethink my stance on anything. I'm too old and onery. II'm set in my ways. Maybe if I ended up homeless I may become a liberal but that's a long shot. I'd rather just shoot myself.

I don't think the arguments necessarily have to be "good" to convince a person.

I believe the most important thing in convincing anyone is to cater to their perspective. As long as the argument addresses the specific perspective of the individual, it will be more convincing.