Which was a better trilogy?
Starwars
Side Score: 9
|
Lord of the Rings
Side Score: 7
|
|
|
|
3
points
2
points
The Star Wars story is way bigger and more complex than Lord of the Rings. All of the movies Included the clone wars animations, maybe cover 10% of the whole Star Wars saga. Star Wars facinated a lot of people by the story, complexibility and awesomeness. Just the idea of the laserswords and lightspeed from 1974 is amazing. These are classics where Lord of the Rings has no chance! Side: Starwars
Honestly, when it comes to 'classics', LOTR is far more 'classic' than Star Wars. Tolkein redefined and spurred a whole new genre into action. As for Star Wars, even though the books and story may be good, I think Star Trek took the Sci-Fi genre off instead. Also, I don't mean to be mean, but it brought a smile to my face. You wrote the word (or non-word) 'complexibility'. I thought it was funny (not in a bad way. New words are fine, especially when they're just suffixes and prefixes added to them!) Side: lord of the rings
1
point
I would say Star Wars. Good acting, the effects are pretty cool and its a classic. I never understood Lord of the Rings. Also starwars has something lord of the rings doesn't have... the force and some guns....and for sure it doesn't have this huge battle station that can destroy planets...I would say it is the best series of movies made. :D Side: Starwars
|
2
points
1
point
|