CreateDebate


Debate Info

3
22
Iran North Korea
Debate Score:25
Arguments:22
Total Votes:26
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Iran (1)
 
 North Korea (16)

Debate Creator

excon(18261) pic



Who is Trump gonna attack first? Iran, or North Korea?

Iran

Side Score: 3
VS.

North Korea

Side Score: 22

Who is Trump gonna attack first? Iran, or North Korea?

If he were the last administration, we'd be in wars worldwide already.

Side: Iran
AlofRI(3294) Clarified
1 point

Strange, the last administration was there for 8 years and we had NO feeling that we might go to war. We had treaties (that have been broken now), We had Ambassadors in most countries, (we don't, now), We TRIED to negotiate with Russia, but they declined and Putin took over. Still, we had a nuclear treaty with them and it stood … until Trump. We had quality people in the, now stripped State Dept. If we had that "last administration", we would be doing something to prevent Putin from meddling in our next election …. other than saying: "I don't know why he WOULD". We wouldn't be having sex with Kim, he'd be hurting even worse from sanctions. Bront, you have a strange thought process.

Anyway, My money is on Iran … Bolton has always wanted to "Bomb, bomb, bomb Iran!" ;-)

Side: Iran
Amarel(5669) Clarified
3 points

we had NO feeling that we might go to war.

You might have had that feeling if you were one of the Americans deployed to Iraq after we gave it back, Libya, or Syria. Or if you were one of the drone pilots dropping bombs in Pakistan, Oman, Yemen, or some other country we hadn’t consulted with before bombing their territory.

You might have had that feeling, but the news was different in those days.

Side: Iran
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
1 point

AL i thought America was already supposed to be at war with NORTH KOREA !!!!! LMMFAO!

https://carnegieendowment.org/2017/12/14/rocket-men-how-trump-is-increasing-risk- of-nuclear-war-pub-75025

Even after the Cold War, when the Soviet Union collapsed and the threat of nuclear destruction receded, the world’s nuclear states continued to follow the diplomatic and behavioral norms of that era. Years of inflammatory statements by North Korea and Russia, for example, were met with comparative calm from the United States, whose responses were carefully calibrated to deter aggression. Global leaders learned to look to the United States as a voice of nuclear reassurance.

Donald Trump’s inability or unwillingness to abide by these norms has revived the sense that Armageddon is once again within the realm of the possible. Tensions with North Korea have grown under his administration, and the danger of nuclear confrontation is now higher than at any time since the Cuban missile crisis. Part of this, of course, is due to North Korea’s pursuit of nuclear capabilities. But much of the blame lies with Trump himself.

ROTFFLMMFAO !!!!!! The FEAR MONGERING only works on you SMALL MINDED SOCIALIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Side: North Korea
1 point

Strange, the last administration was there for 8 years and we had NO feeling that we might go to war.

We dropped bombs and reduced Syria to rubble. We were in a war when Obama started. Obama dropped more bombs than all othern non- WW2 Presidents combined.

https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jan/09/america-dropped-26171-bombs-2016-obama-legacy

I like the reference section over the fiction section.

Side: Iran
1 point

If we had that "last administration", we would be doing something to prevent Putin from meddling in our next election ….

The last administration found out about Russian election meddling in 2014. It did nothing. We know this from the Mueller Report.

Mueller's report looks bad for Obama

(CNN)-

The partisan warfare over the Mueller report will rage, but one thing cannot be denied: Former President Barack Obama looks just plain bad. On his watch, the Russians meddled in our democracy while his administration did nothing about it.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/19/opinions/mueller-report-obama-jennings/index.html

Side: North Korea
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
1 point

Here is what the OBIE LOVER typed - Strange, the last administration was there for 8 years and we had NO feeling that we might go to war.

The above shows how FUCKIN STUPID the SOCIALIST is and now it is time to FUCK with the BRAIN DEAD that knows nothing !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

https://www.latimes.com/projects/la-na-pol-obama-at-war/

Before he took office in 2008, Barack Obama vowed to end America’s grueling conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. During his second term, he pledged to take the country off what he called a permanent war footing.

“Our systematic effort to dismantle terrorist organizations must continue,” he said in May 2013. “But this war, like all wars, must end. That’s what history advises. It’s what our democracy demands.”

But Obama leaves a very different legacy as he prepares to hand his commander-in-chief responsibilities to Donald Trump.

U.S. military forces have been at war for all eight years of Obama’s tenure, the first two-term president with that distinction. He launched airstrikes or military raids in at least seven countries: Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Somalia and Pakistan.

BOY it is shown you have your HEAD stuck up the ASS of LEFTIST MEDIA and the LIES they tell you well all you do is just SWALLOW the PUKE !!!!!!!!!!

Side: North Korea
2 points

How long ago was it that you were bitching about Trump liking Kim?

Side: North Korea
2 points

They’re both shit holes why not attack the two of them together?

Side: North Korea
2 points

Agreed Miss Jody, which country is worse to you?..............................................................................................................................................................

Side: North Korea
1 point

I think North Korea , entire families are sent to “re-education camps “ the population seems to be always at levels of near starvation .Have a look at the military parade they host every year and ever individual you will see is as thin as a wafer

Side: North Korea
2 points

Both represent real dangers and the old adage, attack is the best form of defense is particularly good potential option to deal with the threat posed by these two rogue states.

They've been put on notice;- don't poke the tiger.

Side: North Korea
1 point

https://www.latimes.com/projects/la-na-pol-obama-at-war/

Before he took office in 2008, Barack Obama vowed to end America’s grueling conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. During his second term, he pledged to take the country off what he called a permanent war footing.

“Our systematic effort to dismantle terrorist organizations must continue,” he said in May 2013. “But this war, like all wars, must end. That’s what history advises. It’s what our democracy demands.”

But Obama leaves a very different legacy as he prepares to hand his commander-in-chief responsibilities to Donald Trump.

U.S. military forces have been at war for all eight years of Obama’s tenure, the first two-term president with that distinction. He launched airstrikes or military raids in at least seven countries: Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Somalia and Pakistan.

Your DUMB ASS is really IGNORANT and lack of KNOWLEDGE proves how STUPID you are !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Side: North Korea

I'm not quite sure which war the Democrat Party will support this time, but there is one thing we all know... for a fact!

The Democrat Party has declared war on every single unborn baby, including healthy viable babies.

The sad fact about this war is how these defenseless innocent human lives have no means of protection, other than Pro life people fighting on their behalf.

Side: North Korea