CreateDebate


Debate Info

306
192

Mark Begich (D)


Ted Stevens (R)

Debate Score:498
Arguments:109
Total Votes:511
Ended:11/05/08
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 
Mark Begich (D)
(66)
 
 
Ted Stevens (R)
(43)

Debate Creator

CreateDebate(732) pic



This debate has ended. You can no longer add arguments or vote in this debate.

Who should I vote for in the 2008 Alaska Senate Race?

CNN Election Center (www.cnn.com)


Mark Begich (D)

Side Score: 306
Winning Side!
VS.


Ted Stevens (R)

Side Score: 192
7 points

Aside from the fact that the 84-year-old Ted Stevens just got indicted by the FBI, Mark Begich, the Mayor of Anchorage, is at the forefront of the Environmental movement. Alaska is the United States' leading energy producer and it would be a huge step for the Environmental movement in the United States if a "green" Democrat were to represent Alaska in Washington.

Supporting Evidence: Begich's Global Warming Platform (www.begich.com)
Side: Mark Begich
AKlifer(7) Disputed
6 points

How is Mark "Buddies deals" Begich a leader in the Enviornmental movement, by supporting ANWR drilling?

Or perhaps by clear cutting in town to put unneeded storm drains in that allow automotive runoff unfiltered and directly into the bay and ocean, killing fish & fowl? (Of course these have also been "buddy deals," as the folks that were paid big $$ bragged that he brought them up to SIDEWAY BORE into the ground with their expensive rigs shipped here to AK (vs. just putting in a culvert). How about all of the unneeded repaving in town with added curbs (not animal friendly nor snow removal friendly when motor graders are out in the winter, they break it up & it must be repaved over&over;), that makes Huey Long look amateurish. But then ongoing concrete projects cost lots&lots;of money & require lots and lots of concrete...shall I go on? I know LOTS of such deals, including his realtor fees made on local "required" deals as mayor... check out www. begichbaggage.com, too. Inform yourself!

At least Stevens cares about Alaskans, villagers without indoor plumbing, healthcare and heat. He can & does something for all of us, not himself.-An Alaskan.

Side: Ted Stevens
aksk8er(5) Disputed
5 points

This country doesn't need "green" right now!...Oil needs developing in our country NOW,...we need to stop handing opec billions of dollars and making those countries richer and richer!

Side:
Ted Stevens (R)
6 points

Mark Begich has an “Ethics Pledge” on his website.

Mark Begich’s ethics pledge includes:

1. Making financial records, detailed, and open to the public

2. Ban secret meetings, earmarks, and hidden connection

3. Stop special senate privileges

4. Provide campaign records in a timely manner

5. Giving Alaskans straight answers and accessibility

Supporting Evidence: The Begich Ethics Pledge (www.begich.com)
Side: Mark Begich
AKlifer(7) Disputed
7 points

Dancyn, Do you know WHY Begich put that "Ehics Pledge" up?

because he has been accused of so many backroom deals!

Check out Ray Medcalf's posts. He even gives tours in town of Mark Begich's dirty little deals. Did you know that the city is in the shopping center business (given a non-competitive bid to Outside TX developers, Begich $ supporters, of course!) He is extremely unethical & is for #1! Mark Begich, of course! We are spending $7M+ to close a downtown street to make it a pedestrian walkway "we need," coincidentally that holds 2 Begich&wife;businesses. How about the 2 shops she got for low price at the new airport terminal after no one would bid becuase of the price they would cost? Hers were placed under the wire. He became a realtor so he could make monies off oc "town deals." he has run shameful ads, running on the grief & loss of his father many eons ago in a plane crash-ug. Not all Begich's are so self serving, however. His brother Nick is an outstanding enviornmental legal mind who has written 2 books on the subject & helped several Native grooups, including Chickalook Athabascans. Learn your facts & open your eyes!

Side: Ted Stevens
Denali(26) Disputed
6 points

Mark Begich failed to report his wife's stock holdings. He didn't submit an accurate campaign disclosure report. When his report was filed, he is now facing the same crime on a state level that Ted Stevens is facing. To be fair, Begich should be indicted and face proceedings. A complaint has already been filed with the Alaska Public Offices Commission. Therefore, I can not agree that your posting of his ethics pledge is valid. He broke his promise.

Side: Begich failed his own ethics pledge
6 points

Begich holds the unique position of a Democrat that favors drilling in ANWR. Most of Alaska's population supports drilling, though up until the present time, Stevens has been unsuccessful at garnering support for drilling. This shows the necessity for change, which Begich can provide. Begich is not afraid to cross party lines for the sake of supporting those that will elect him, which is beneficial in that it shows both his devotion to Alaska and the possibility of him uniting the two parties over issues that he feels strongly about.

Supporting Evidence: Oil and Gas: Alaska's industry (www.juneauempire.com)
Side:
Mark Begich (D)
6 points

Begich's willingness to break from his own party and natural left of centre constituency should bould well for his ability to step across the aisle and solve issues practically while in office.

Side: Mark Begich
6 points

Latest pictures out today show an unhappy Senator Stevens trying to avoid the press yesterday afternoon. Several of his fellow Republican's appear to be abandoning ship in support of him. A spokesperson For John McCain said this, "The indictment was a "sad reminder" that the next president will have to work to rebuild the public's trust." Apparently McCain often argued with Stevens over the appropriation process since it led to corruption often times and then The American people lose faith in government. Senator Stevens met with the federal judge yesterday, who set the ground rules concerning his indictment. He pled innocent but if convicted he might get 5 years for each of the 7 counts against him. He son, Ben, also may be implicated. As the oldest sitting Republican in the Senate it is a sad time. He will be remembered for this, not his previous 40 years of service to the Alaskan people. This is another incident of how power corrupts and how important drilling for oil in Alaska is to the Oil companies. They are more than eager to court and woo senators with bribes. And meanwhile the Alaskan people now may suffer without a strong representation in Washington at a critical time when someone needs to protect Alaska's best interests. He will be so busy defending himself he may not have much time to devote the state he represents. Guilty or not, he should apologize to the people who put him there, for any hint of dishonesty and for this distraction to the real work at hand.

Supporting Evidence: Senator Stevens vs the Fed Govt (news.yahoo.com)
Side: Alaska without a voice
6 points

Senator John McCain distanced himself immediately from Senator Stevens by donating $5000 he had received from a PAC Northen Light tied to the indicted Senator. It was donated to the Flight 93 Memorial Fund. This was very smart on McCain's part as it seems the Republican party needs to dodge every bullet coming their way. With so many seats up for grabs in this upcoming election and rumors flying that the democrats are going to make a big sweep, McCain didn't waste any time or beat around the bush in showing that this is not good for the party's image whether true or not. The Republicans appear to be on the defensive during this campaign season. This is not a good position to be in. With so many issues on the front burner, gas prices, a prolonged war, economic problems on the homefront, this issue regarding Stevens just adds fuel to the flames.

Supporting Evidence: McCain returns donations (embeds.blogs.foxnews.com)
Side: National concerns for state politics
5 points

If this is really going to the year of change for the Democrats in Washington, then the first person that they are going to have to beat is the longest-tenured Republican Senator. Their platforms are world apart and Begich is running on Stevens' weakest points. Mark Begich's top issues are Education, Environment and Ethics. Senator Ted Stevens has stated that he believes that it will take 700-900 years to see the effects of Global Warming, received a "D" rating from the National Education Association in 2007 for his Education voting record, and is currently under indictment by the FBI, facing criminal charges.

Supporting Evidence: Mark Begich's Full Platform (www.begich.com)
Side: Mark Begich
5 points

Due to his recent indictment, Stevens faces a time-consuming legal battle which will presumably distract him from his senatorial duties. Distractions aside, Stevens has enough trouble fulfilling such duties as it is; the veteran lawmaker is perhaps best known outside of Alaska for the erroneous claims he made on the senate floor to the effect that the commercialization of the internet is preventing e-mails from reaching their intended destinations in a timely manner. Given an opportunity to address the nation's significant infrastructure challenges, Stevens chose not to educate himself on the topic beforehand. Whether he belongs in prison has yet to be decided; that he does not belong in the U.S. Senate has been clear for years.

Stevens Discusses Net Neutrality on Senate Floor
Side: Mark Begich
5 points

It is even more absurd if you listen to the entire ten and a half minute clip of him ranting on about net neutrality. He is more coherent in most of this clip than he is in the youtube video, though it is still very obvious that he feels completely comfortable confidently speaking on an issue that he only has subjective "facts" on. He is completely out of touch with both common sense and reality.

Supporting Evidence: Full audio clip of Stevens discussing net neutrality (www.publicknowledge.org)
Side:
Mark Begich (D)
5 points

This is a good example of how out of touch Senator Stevens is. Of course he is older and can't be expected to be Internet savvy. But also he should at least have a working knowledge of these things. If he doesn't, he should have the common sense to remain quiet and not show his lack of keeping up with the times. It would again be an argument for term limits. Sometimes change or young blood is necessary for a different perspective.

Side: Internet
5 points

It's also somewhat amusing to hear him spend a minute and a half trying to describe what Netflix is.

Side: Senator Stevens voting record
5 points

Senator Stevens, because of his recent federal indictment on corruption charges, has apparently adapted a defensive posture toward any mention of his legal troubles. On public radio's "Talk of Alaska" August 19th, the long-serving Stevens became hostile anytime a caller mentioned his federal case. With Stevens likely to win the Republican primary August 26th against little known opposition, he still faces a tough re-election battle this November. It is clear that the corruption charges will not go away.

Senator Stevens on Alaska Public Radio
Side: Stevens Adopts Defensive Tone
5 points

Frankly, never has the issue of ethics been this far to the forefront of an election. Mark Begich is running with the ethics issue very high in his platform. Ted Stevens is trying to stay out of jail.

In April, the National Republican Senatorial Committee finally launched "begichbaggage.com" after months of stalling in a attempt to attack him on the very issue he believes to be incredibly important. The site currently features four tidbits about Begich's mortgage and taxes. Meanwhile, everything "unethical" that you need to know about Senator Ted Stevens is currently posted on the front page of every major news outlet.

Supporting Evidence: Begich takes step toward Senate campain (www.adn.com)
Side: Mark Begich
5 points

In a Senate race with the clear choice between new voices versus keeping the old guard, it appears that change will happen, whether Alaskans want it or not. With the indictment of Senator-For-Life Ted Stevens for bribery, corruption will now be the issue in the campaign. Will Stevens tough it out or resign for the good of the Republican Party and the citizens of his great state? Stay tuned.

Side: Clean Politics
5 points

That Stevens' career may end amidst charges that he violated the law should be of little surprise; Stevens' career began in a similar fashion. By the senator's own admission, he and his associates "were violating the law" by "lobbying from the executive branch" on behalf of Alaska during its Eisenhower-era campaign for statehood, even though, as Stevens himself admits, "there's been a statute against that for a long time." In doing so, Stevens became a hero to many Alaskans, while at the same time demonstrating his contempt for the rule of law. One who routinely breaks such laws ought not to be writing them.

Supporting Evidence: Stevens on Alaskan Statehood (nl.newsbank.com)
Side: Clean Politics
Inkwell(328) Disputed
3 points

Exceeding one's legal limits has long been a practice of elected officials. Thomas Jefferson, a long time opponent of excessive executive power changed his mind when elected. He far exceeded his authority in funding the Louisiana Purchase. But like you describe regarding Alaskans, the purchase was so popular that no one squawked about it. Same thing happened over and over under President Andrew Jackson. It appears that if Stevens is out, his opponent may enter under the same ethical/legal cloud. Stevens has been an effective Representative of his electorate. If Alaskans vote for change now, they should be sure of what they are getting to replace him. If the newcomer is under the same cloud but isn't as effective, what is accomplished by jettisoning Stevens?

Side: Ted Stevens
5 points

There are some disturbing trends in Stevens' voting record, especially in regards to his attachment to oil:

6/10/03 - voted no to funding research for hydrogen cells

6/16/05 - voted no to reducing US dependence on foreign oil

11/03/05 - this one is very suspicious - voted no to an amendment that would have Alaska pay the US treasury 50% of revenues from oil and gas, though would give Alaska the ability to file a civil action to request a percentage increase in revenues. the leasing and production of oil and gas would be prohibited after the civil action was filed.

6/14/07 - voted no to clean energy achievement bill

6/21/07 - voted no to alternate energy subsidies

Stevens refuses to support alternate forms of energy and he opposes any regulation of Alaska's oil profits. He clearly wants to keep the US dependent on oil and he wants to personally benefit from it as much as possible.

Supporting Evidence: Stevens' voting record (www.votesmart.org)
Side: alternative energy
5 points

There seems to be a “culture of corruption” surrounding Ted Stevens and other Republicans in that state. Congressman Don Young (R) is also under criminal investigation for bribes as well. This is a disturbing trend for Republicans. According to an editorial from The Nation, “For years Republicans maintained a political monopoly in the state by fusing oil money and pork-barrel politics. Now it's all unraveling.”

Supporting Evidence: Alaska Senator Latest Victim of Culture of Corruption (news.yahoo.com)
Side: Clean Politics
5 points

Among other principles, Begich's ethics pledge states that all senators should abide by a law of making financial records easily accessible. So far he has lived up to this, and if he becomes senator and continues to follow through, it can be a start of a truly incredible thing. From the personal scope, one of the biggest economic issues in the United States is having to wonder if your tax money is being wasted or stolen by politicians. If he and others in his state release their records and are able to account for every dollar of the state's budget, it will but people's minds at ease and would place tremendous pressure on other politicians to follow his lead. This would be especially important if Stevens is shown to have accepted bribes and lied.

Supporting Evidence: Begich's financial records (begich.com)
Side: financial disclosure
5 points

Mark Begich understands the impact the Internet has had since its inception. Ted Stevens has been completely lost on any Internet-related issues, as made clear when he describe the web as "a series of tubes" after rambling, confusing remarks in a speech. Stevens also voted against Net Neutrality.

A Series of Tubes
Side: Internet
5 points

In this specific race, state issues have blended with a sense of concern for the present national agenda. By this I mean that national petroleum considerations have brought the long time divisive issue of drilling in Anwar to the front of this political arena. Since both candidates align themselves with what polls indicate to be the Alaskan consensus of allowing drilling we must consider other issues. Perhaps the more pressing issues presented in the collective Alaskan Consciousness are not of the candidates themselves but more a reflection of affecting national politics at the state level. The candidate for change over the incumbent, the old house against the new acquisition, partisan politics (scandal) over a clean slate. They are not people so much as representations of ideas.

Begich's response to scandal allegations and it's effect on the race
Side: National concerns for state politics
5 points

Mark Begich wants to repeal the Patriot Act, a review of the controversial FISA act, and also pledges to restore habeus corpus. Many feel the executive branch of government has oversteeped constitutional checks and balances and has unfairly used legislation to spy on its citizens.

Supporting Evidence: Patriot Act (begich.com)
Side: Patriot Act
5 points

Begich is a lifelong member of the National Rifle Association. He is a strong supporter of the second ammendment and firmly believes in the right to bear arms. His views differ from most Democrats, also showing his willingness to act in a bi-partisan manner.

Supporting Evidence: Gun Rights (www.peninsulaclarion.com)
Side: Gun rights
5 points

Environmental issues are clearly a factor in the State of Alaska and though Senator Stevens has addressed these issues he has lacked specific focus on finding effective solutions by region. This consideration of flexible solutions for energy consumption throughout Alaska has been outlined in a recent interview with Mark Begich. He does not yet have a proven track record in the Senate and whether or not he will provide an effective lobby for his positions remains to be seen. However, this interview at least shows an acknowledgment that diverse solutions are required for one of the worlds most complex problems, especially in a state with the land mass of Alaska.

Supporting Evidence: Diverse Energy Solutions (www.mahalo.com)
Side: alternative energy
5 points

In February of 2007 Ted Stevens sponsored Senate bill #49, which would have effectively banned Wikipedia, Myspace, Facebook, and all other social networking sites from public schools. The reason the senator gave for this ban was to protect children from predators and "cyber-bullying". However, the language in the bill was so over broad and vague that it would have served as an effective means of limiting the libertarian medium that is the internet. Banning any online forum is limiting freedom of speech. The internet has become an invaluable tool for schoolchildren today and to take away user policed forums would be a suppression of the marketplace of ideas. Besides, many social networking sites already have appropriate security measures in place such as one I'm sure will be familiar to all of you, the "Report this comment" button. (ha ha ha)

Supporting Evidence: Senat Bill #49 (thomas.loc.gov)
Side: Internet
5 points

Senator Stevens voted against LIHEAP Legislation, this bill would help the lower income families with heating needs. "The high cost of energy is the top concern facing Alaska families and Senator Stevens' vote against federal aid is an outrage," said Begich. Some 14,000 families may experience a harsh winter if this legislation is not passed.

Supporting Evidence: Begich: Vote Against Energy Assistance An Outrage (begich.com)
Side: Mark Begich
5 points

Interestingly enough, Senator Ted Stevens voted "no" on establishing the Senate office of Public Intergrity in March 2006. And another odd vote came on that same month, he voted "yes" to allowing some lobbyists to give gifts to congress, this also happened in March 2006. Quite possibly that was a generous time for him and some of his very supportive friends, like Veco Corp. Maybe he wanted everyone in politics to feel the love?

Despite his spiraling out of control situation with the Federal charges he now faces, his fellow conservative friends are bailing him out and donating alot of money to helping him maintain his seat. He recently had one of his best fund raising quarters in his career. But with the likes of Orrin Hatch, Kay Bailey Hutchinson and Kit Bond throwing money at his re-election campaign, he just may somehow pull off a win in Alaska. the big question though is can he telecommute fom jail and serve in the Senate? There's always a first time for everything. And this may warm him up to the Internet, he never seemed to cyber-savvy and opposed many social websites. We shall see.

Supporting Evidence: Senator Stevens on the issues (www.ontheissues.org)
Side: Senator Stevens voting record
5 points

Regardless of Sen. Steven's reputation or what he's come to symbolize to the Alaskan voters, the controversy surrounding his dealings with Veco Corp. present a microcosm of what ails and impedes our political process and its concern for and productivity within our nation.

Alaska is one of, if not the most, rich and bountiful states, both in its natural resources and in its environment, of the United States. The appointed leader who is responsible for the legislation concerning Alaska, it's people, and it's resources (especially in an age during which we are attempting to move away from dependence on foreign energy sources) needs to be and reflect a high ethical standard of both honesty and fairness.

Although many claim that Steven's pull in Congress, as evidence in the "Bridge to Nowhere" project and his effectiveness in bringing up to $2 million to clean up the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill from the Alaskan coast, is reason enough to support him in November, his lack of transparency in the Veco case should call his integrity into question and beg serious consideration of the policies and proposals of Mark Begich.

Supporting Evidence: Steven's Veco Case (www.bloomberg.com)
Side: Steven's Veco case
5 points

Since Alaska has more veterans per capita that any other state, it is vital that the senatorial candidate elected has their best interest at heart. If elected, Begich hopes to update the much outdated and low-coverage G.I. Bill to provide for education coverage for vets. A proposed plan would benefit veterans who have served since 9/11 by covering the full cost of the highest priced public college in their state.

Begich's new G.I. bill would satisfy many promises that the current administration has not and provide a clear future for our Iraq soldiers' higher education.

Begich for the new GI bill
Side: Begich for troops
5 points

As an Independent conservative and a small-government Alaskan, Mark Begich knows how necessary it is for Alaskans to maintain their freedoms. Alaska is one of the few states with the "State Privacy Provision" written into their constitution and so, even though a democrat, Begich knows that supporting the Independent is the way to go if he is going to maintain speed through November. He has introduced since last month a 5-point plan entitled "Protecting Alaskans' Rights"

"As a US senator I will fiercely fight against government intrusion into lives of Alaskans."

This is especially important now because Washington is looking into drilling prospects in the Alaskan Wilderness. Begich hopes to harness that attention and turn it into profit for out-of-work Alaskans.

Begich speaks up for an Independent Alaska
Side: Independent
5 points

I find it very interesting that, up until this point, Mark Begich has refrained from pin-pointing the scandal and trial that will keep Ted Stevens (R) away from the campaign trail in the Alaska Senate race.

Instead, Begich is focusing his campaign against the incumbent senator on the issues that are of immediate concern to the state and the people of Alaska. The opportunity to use Steven's corruption scandal involving $250,000 of funds the senator received from VECO Corp. against the GOP in this race is prime campaign ad material, yet Begich has decided to address the issues and not curtail into a endless cycle of sound bites and mudslinging between the parties.

Such a decision, if it holds out through the fall with Stevens' trial in September, is worth noting and reflects a much-needed "change" in traditional political discourse and the democratic process.

Supporting Evidence: New Politic (www.guardian.co.uk)
Side: New Politic
5 points

In an ominous turn of events for Ted Stevens., the selection of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin as John McCain's running mate has hurt Steven's re-election chances and helped Mark Begich. Prominent Republicans like Bree Buchanan, sister of Pat Buchanan, are talking about how Gov. Palin has "stood up to the corruption of Ted Stevens" and canceled "the bridge to nowhere". McCains talks about how Palin stood up to the Alaska Republican establishment, and he means Stevens and Congressman Don Young. When your political party starts running against you, look out!

Side: Mark Begich
4 points

At least Mark Begich isn't under investigation from the FBI.

Side: Mark Begich
4 points

An article from MSNBC states that the Justice Department indicted Senator Ted Stevens (R). Prosecutors say he received $250,000 in gifts and services from VECO Corp. He has been under suspicion for his home renovations and his business dealings with wealthy oil contractors. He has been the longest serving Republican senator—it’s time for new blood. Also, his indictment doesn’t look good for his chances on re-election. It does not look like a good year for the Republicans.

Supporting Evidence: Justice Department indicts Sen. Ted Stevens (www.msnbc.msn.com)
Side: Mark Begich
GreggG(22) Disputed
6 points

There is a difference between being indicted and being found guilty. Stevens was indicted by a federal grand jury. He has yet to have a trial comprised of a jury of his peers. There are plenty of instances where people have been indicted but have not been found guilty of crimes. We have to assume Steves is innocent until a jury rules against him or he accepts the government's charges.

Also "it's time for new blood" is not a good thing, especially for a state with little population. A lot of Alaska's development has come because of Stevens' experience in Washington. The state has recieved more federal money per capita than any other in the union. When losing a politician with that great a skill in bringing money home, Alaska will lose out on the federal funding it has recieved over the years.

Side: Federal Money
dancyn(31) Disputed
5 points

Ted Stevens does deserve a fair trial—I’ll give him that. If he is found guilty, I stand by what I said of “new blood” only because as I stated in another argument that bribery should not be tolerated in a constitutional republic. And if he breaks the law, then he deserves punishment.

From what I’ve been reading on some comments of other Alaskans (http://community.adn.com/adn/adn_pubstory_478349?page=1) who stand by Stevens, one has said, “I don't care what he did. He doesn't deserve to go to jail. This man has done more for Alaska than anyone.” Then another comment, which does not favor Stevens, “He's hurt many fishermen lives, damaged the enrichment of our state coffers, made Japanese trading companies rich and provided for great wealth for his cronies.” I’ll just say that God only knows if this man is innocent or not. If Stevens is found guilty, it shouldn’t matter if he’s done a lot of “good” in that state. What should matter is that principle should triumph over pragmatism.

Supporting Evidence: Pragmatism vs. Principle (www.minutemenunited.com)
Side: Clean Politics
5 points

You bring a great point, Igor. Mark Begich, being on the forefront of the Environment movement is a big plus. We, as a nation need to look into “green” solutions as far as the oil and energy crisis looms on the horizon. The Alaskans will be fortunate to have someone like Mr. Begich moving in such a progressive way. He is looking to help the families and communities of Alaska with the profits from their energy producers (the state is number one). We now see where those profits went under Ted Steven’s reign as senator all those years…

Supporting Evidence: On the Issues --Mark Begich (begich.com)
Side: Mark Begich
5 points

Could there possibly be a great priority for a politician than getting his/her terroritory the frits of their resources? By ensuring Alaska benefits from its riches Begich proves himself to be an excellent candidate.

Side: Mark Begich
4 points

Mark Begich's campaign slogan is "Honest Leadership For Alaska". He has led Anchorage as mayor efficiently and has experienced a great swell of popularity there. Chuck Schumer, the head of the Democratic campaign Committee said "We think Alaska is a state we'll win." He is confident and his numbers have increased this month. Bothcandidates are about even in votes from men but Begich carries the woman's vote by a 22 point lead. Overall Begich received 63% favorablity in a recent Rasmussen poll. This is up from 56% last month. And now with all the fallout of Senator Ted Stevens' 7 felony charges, stemming from allegations of bribery by Veco Corp, an oil company. Added to this is that Senator Stevens is the oldest serving Republican in the senate, age 84. Many think that after 40 years in government Alaska needs a change. This might be the perfect time.

Supporting Evidence: Rasmussen report Alaskan Sanate race 2008 (www.rasmussenreports.com)
Side: Mark Begich
3 points

Sometimes a politician who is dearly loved and has served his constituents well stays a little too long. In Ted Steven's case it has long been well known that he is a bully, but when the bully is on your side who cares? Just like George Allen's Macaca moment, Ted Stevens has become an embarrassment to Alaska. Not because he made a mistake but because he became a cliche. Everybody knew what he was yet as long as it wasn't making the states residents look like fools it was tolerable. Now it's clear that Alaskans will have to choose between humiliation or reality. Unfortunately at a time like this an honorable man steps aside and takes an accounting of his blessings. In this case just as pride cometh before the fall, surely Ted Stevens pride will lead him to a very great fall. Such as it is, Alaskans really have no choice.

Side: Clean Politics
3 points

So long as Gov. Palin holds off on making any public statement that either approves or disapproves of Sen. Ted Stevens as he continues on with his indictment trial, a substantial (albeit "theoretical") voter shift is left hanging in the balance.

Should Gov. Palin openly endorse the incumbent and well-known Senator, you could put money down that Stevens would see an immediate upswing in the polls and perhaps just enough to stave off any last minute ad stretch Begich might have in his cards as election day approaches.

Nonetheless, Palin's platform of "being tough against corruption" or what-have-you leave her in a pinch so far as her public position on Sen. Stevens.

On the other hand, if Palin gives a thumbs-down (or if she doesn't say anything at all) Mark Begich (D) can ride this trial against Stevens and the unavoidable disappointment it will inflict on his voters all the way to a upset victory and unseating of Stevens in November.

Up to this point, however, the campaign is a permanent fixture on the national stage both on account of the indictments against Sen. Stevens and for the rising star of Gov. Palin as GOP Vice Presidential hopeful.

Only time will tell who benefits the most from the attention, the Democrat Begich or the GOP.

Supporting Evidence: An Interesting Situation (thehill.com)
Side: An Interesting Situation
1 point

Yesterday Sen. Ted Stevens (R) lost a bid to dismiss the charges of corruption piled against him on account of his much publicized financial relationship with VECO Corp. The trial begins on September 22nd and will take place in Washington rather than Alaska (which the Senator also put a bid in for and lost as well.)

All this has to come as good news for the Mark Begich campaign who is just barely ahead of the incumbent Republican according to the most recent polls. With the Senator tied up with the trial proceedings in the next few weeks, Begich is hoping to gain an advantage through heavy campaign ad cycles and public appearances to extend his lead amongst Alaskan voters.

Supporting Evidence: Lost Bids (www.reuters.com)
Side: Lost Bids
1 point

Mark Begich hiked his campaign trail out into the rural areas of Alaska making stops in towns such as Nome, Bethel, Kotzebue, Akiachak, and Kasigluk. From this tour, Begich has put together an eight-point plan to strengthen Alaska's rural communities.

The plan breaks down accordingly:

1. He wants to cut energy costs and implement more efficient energy standards for community buildings and private homes. He aims to develop more efficient renewable generation systems and bring the gasoline, oil, and gas development benefits to the people in the rural areas of Alaska.

2. He wants to improve health care for Alaska natives by closing health care funding gaps; developing Alaska's own health care professionals; funding water and wastewater improvements; investing in the Denali Commission Success; expanding long-term care options for Alaskans; and improving behavioral health services.

3. He plans to offer more economic opportunities to rural Alaskans by bringing affordable high-speed internet services to rural businesses; backing the regional corporations and tribal governments; protecting the Small Business Administration's 8(a) program for economic development; and bring more federal funding to the state.

4. He promises to strengthen public safety in order to guarantee Alaskan families' safety.

5. Begich plans to boost rural education by repealing the No Child Left Behind Act and supporting policies that "respect community values" (http://begich.com/issues/rural). He will endorse a culturally relevant curriculum; prioritize early learning programs; and offer more opportunities for higher education to rural Alaskan high school students.

6. He want to see cooperation between tribal leaders, federal agencies, and business owners towards the shared goal of economic development and progress on Alaska's federal lands.

7. Begich will devote himself to protecting subsistence rights in the hunting and fishing industries.

8. Last of all, Begich is seeking to empower his fellow Alaskans to make their own decisions as to how to best serve, protect, and improve the rights, conditions, and economic progress of their state.

The Democratic Senate hopeful notes the inspiration that motivated his economic plan, "“As I’ve traveled through rural Alaska , I have visited with elders, teachers, hospital staff, and community leaders. My rural plan is based on conversations and ideas I have heard loudly and clearly from Alaska ’s Native peoples.”

Supporting Evidence: Begich Eight Point Rural Economy (alaskareport.com)
Side: Begich Eight Point Rural Economy

This is kind of a deal breaker for me, and for I imagine many patriotic voters: Stevens voted against educational benefits for veterans of the Iraq war because it's a volunteer army? Huh?

"I think supporting our veterans, especially those who felt the calling to service, is not a controversial issue. It's troubling that Senator Stevens is trying to make a false distinction between what our country owes veterans of today and veterans of wars past." Matt Browner Hamlin

Give this post a thumbs up if full veterans benefits are an essential, urgent priority.

Supporting Evidence: Mark Begich: Standing Up to Ted Stevens for Today's Veterans (www.vetvoice.com)
Side: Mark Begich

“Would you have any difficulty finding an 84-year-old guilty of a crime if you knew that a conviction might result in a prison term?”

Curious that sending Ted Stevens to jail at the age of 84 is an issue, but where's the beef about sending him to congress at that age? In the video, Mark Begich talks a great deal about the future of Alaska. Is Stevens really in a position to talk about the future?

This is also another deal breaker for me, (although, to keep things in perspective, veteran's benefits are a no-brainer). What kind of hubris does it take to be that old and run anyway? Suggests a kind of arrogance to me, or worse yet, senility, and all the poor judgment that goes along with that kind of mental deterioration. Issues aside, the average life expectancy for an American male at present is 75.4 years, it just doesn't make sense to gamble on being around long enough to make a difference!

TPMtv at Netroots Nation: Mark Begich
Side: Mark Begich
1 point

Mark Begich (D) has spoken out in frustration with regards to the bailout plan both in its first form that failed in the House on Monday and in its new form as it now sits in the House after passing the Senate last night.

He claims that the plan is still missing the point by doing more to compensate Wall Street without providing the proper protections for Main Street.

"They must focus on an economic stimulus package for both the long-term and the short-term."

The proposals that Begich has supported are "an expansion of FDIC insurance for private deposits up to $250,000 that was added by the Senate on Tuesday" (newsminer.com). He also wants to establish solid protections for 401K plans and other savings accounts and the finance options for American homeowners.

Supporting Evidence: Begich's Bailout Hopes (newsminer.com)
Side: Begich's Bailout Hopes
1 point

The latest Rasmussen Report shows the Alaska Senate race neck-to-neck as Democrat Mark Begich has pulled within one point behind incumbent Republican Sen. Ted Stevens.

The polls show the race at 49 percent to 48 percent in favor of Stevens who (as you know) is facing seriously challenges to his campaign as he undergoes investigations in court in Washington, D.C.

The most inspiring fact, however, for Begich's people is the Rasmussen's results claiming "Begich currently leads his opponent 56% to 39% among unaffiliated voters in Alaska. The race is identical between men and women, with 49% going for Stevens and 48% who favor Begich."

The importance of the "unaffiliated vote" or the "independent vote" or the "undeclared vote" cannot and should not be underestimated in this year's election and with the economic crisis working in favor of Democratic candidates as of late, the math for Begich is looking very good for the month of October.

Supporting Evidence: Virtual Tie (www.rasmussenreports.com)
Side: Virtual Tie
BigIron(477) Disputed
1 point

Let me not get ahead of myself here and forget to mention the much-needed shock treatment that the Sarah Palin Vice President nomination alongside John McCain has given to the recently slumping campaign of Republican Ted Stevens.

The same Rasmussen poll above shows Palin with a 62 percent approval rating (not great but not bad) and an steady decrease the farther removed the race becomes from her speech at the RNC.

However, the boost she gave to the Republican base offers a little (time will tell just how much) momentum to the Stevens race and can hopefully provide enough fuel to carry the small lead in the polls all the way to November.

(At the least, maybe it diverted some attention away from his trial proceedings in D.C.)

Supporting Evidence: Palin Boost (community.adn.com)
Side: Palin Boost
1 point

He is a firm and fair voice for Alaska.

Side: Mark Begich

My father lived in Alaska off and on from 1952 until his death in 2003. He was what they call a real sourdough. He knew everything there was to know about the state- he would go on tirades about James Michner because he described a certain area poorly in his novel Alaska. My father was also a red neck, a working man, and a history buff- and he never, ever had anything but contempt for Ted Stevens. He new plenty of people with connections in Alaskan politics, and he said they all agreed that Stevens was as crooked as the day is long- and in summer, Alaskan days last a mighty long time. Based solely on my dad's views, I say vote for Begich simply to vote against Stevens.

Side: Mark Begich
1 point

Incumbent Republican Senator Ted Stevens was found guilty today on seven charges for the illegal gifts he received from for home renovations from Veco Corp.

Stevens is allegedly to face up to 5 years in prison. However, it is expected that the Senator will most likely serve very little to no time in prison under federal sentencing guidelines.

Although Stevens is still permitted to campaign against Democratic challenger Mark Begich to preserve his seat, Stevens is facing a very brutal climb in a very short time as election day is just over a week away.

Stevens will still be able to serve on the Senate should he beat Begich on November 4th.

The Democratic Party is jumping at this opportunity to push their filibuster-proof majority in Congress. Look for a hike in campaign funds and ad campaigns over the next few days from Begich aiming to capitalize on his rival's unfortunate circumstances.

Supporting Evidence: Stevens Found Guilty (www.foxnews.com)
Side: Stevens Found Guilty
7 points

Ted Stevens is innocent until proven guilty. The one fact that is undeniable is that he has successfully carried Alaskan issues before the US Senate since 1968. The Alaskan population has several reasons to be thankful that Ted has been our US Senator. He has also taken care of business for each and every American which is one of his responsibilities as a US Senator. The cummulation of his record in the Senate is one that we as Americans and Alaskans can be proud to display as an example of what a Senator should be. This trial deserves the attention of the media. It will be the defining moment, nationwide, of the enduring right to a fair trial. It is a moment that US Senator Ted Stevens has to stand before our nation, and prove his innocence. It is a time for Americans to preserve his innocence, unless proven guilty. It is a time that all Americans will be viewing the test of whether we still have rights. I encourage the media. To find it in their ethics to deliver the truth. I encourage the American public to engage in this unfolding revelation of a moment in history which may determine our rights as citizens and as a free nation.

Side: Our responsibility as a free nation
6 points

Ted Stevens has served as a Senator since 1968. During his tenure, he has become a true power broker in Congress, which has served Alaska well. Largely due to Stevens, Alaska recieved more federal money per capita than any other state in the union. When granted statehood, much of rural Alaska's residents lived in third world conditions. One of the keys of success for DC politicians is to steer money back home. Stevens was arguably the greatest politician of his era in doing just that. And, because of his politicking skill, billions of federal dollars were spent in Alaska which helped the state's development.

Supporting Evidence: State of Dependence (findarticles.com)
Side: Federal Money
IgorDerysh(35) Disputed
5 points

That may have been true prior to his recent indictment, but the Republicans have already replaced Stevens on the many committees and subcommittees that he sat on after the controversy surrounding him forced the long time Senator to step down. While he may receive the support of his colleagues, on both sides of the aisle, on a personal level, politically every Republican Senator and their mothers are trying to distance themselves from Stevens.

If Stevens does choose to pursue re-election, it would be interesting to see how much help the weakened Republican National Committee will provide his campaign.

Supporting Evidence: GOP Replaces Stevens (www.cqpolitics.com)
Side: Committee Assignments
5 points

Another thing the Republicans are doing is trying to unload of "Stevens Money" as quickly as they possibly can. Top Republicans Norm Coleman, Elizabeth Dole, Susan Collins and others have announced that they would be donating to charity money that they received from Ted Stevens "Northern Lights" political action committee.

Stevens' PAC has donated in excess of $340,000 in this campaign cycle alone. That's a big chunk of cash now being re-directed from campaign cash to various charities.

The Republicans are running for the hills and perhaps its time to start considering if Stevens will even be on the ballot this year.

Supporting Evidence: GOP Giving Away Stevens Money (firstread.msnbc.msn.com)
Side: Campaign Contributions
chudon(26) Disputed
5 points

In the wake of his indictment the veteran Sen. Stevens has declared a statement of innocence to mixed replies on capitol hill. It is true that the GOP isn't exactly up in arms sharing his enthusiasm for definite innocence, however it seems that perhaps the public is ready to take up his cause. It is possible that in the same way the New York Times alienated readers from both sides of the isle earlier this year after publishing a potentially scandalous piece about Vicki Iseman and Sen. John McCain, Senator Stevens' indictment may have rallied his constituency and solidified his base within the state of Alaska.

Supporting Evidence: Support Rallies for Stevens (ap.google.com)
Side: Stevens rallies base
6 points

AP story detailing that Mark Begich failed to include his wife's stock holdings on his disclosure report. The GOP has filed a complaint with the Alaska Public Offices Commission. This acquisition is of the same nature that Ted Stevens is facing in federal court. Alaska's Governor should call for the immediate proceedings for a formal indictment. The judicial system should treat all cases in an equal and fair manner. Mark Begich should face the inquiry of his peers.

Side: Begich fails disclosure
6 points

Go with the experience/ can't afford a "freshman" senator right now.

Side:
Ted Stevens (R)
5 points

Since most Alaskans support drilling in ANWR, it is not logical for an Alaskan to vote to replace Stevens with a democrat. 70% of Alaskans and 57 out of 60 members of the Alaskan legislature support drilling. However, democrats have been the ones preventing the drilling, and while Begich does support drilling, he only supports it because his state would directly benefit from it – if he did not have this personal interest, he almost definitely would not want to drill. Electing him to the senate would add more power to the democrats, and if you are an Alaskan, this means that there is less of a chance of your state progressing.

Supporting Evidence: Democratic party's refusal to support ANWR (www.klamathbasincrisis.org)
Side:
Ted Stevens (R)
IgorDerysh(35) Disputed
5 points

Mark Begich does, however, also supports the ANWR drilling, unlike many congressional Democrats. In fact, one might make the case that if Alaskans support drilling in ANWR it would make sense to elect Begich in order to have a voice on the opposition. And so if Aluglio is right, and Begich is simply basing his platform on poll numbers, than he's the Alaskan's best bet to have their voice heard.

Supporting Evidence: Begich's Energy Plan (www.begich.com)
Side: alternative energy
aluglio(27) Disputed
5 points

I agree that drilling in ANWR may not be the best path for us. However, this is a democracy. Elected officials are obligated to reflect the demands of those that elected them. It is undeniable that the majority of Alaskans support drilling, and you can not criticize Stevens for doing what any elected official should, and probably would, do in such a situation.

And I am not too sure how your position relates to this debate, being that both candidates support drilling in ANWR

Side:
Ted Stevens (R)
kevind(7) Disputed
5 points

Considering the scope of the impact that the drilling question carries, it is narrow and irresponsible to consider it solely through an Alaskan standpoint. Perhaps the 30 % of Alaskans and the 3 members of the legislature are considering the question through a global, rather than local, lense.

Side: alternative energy
aluglio(27) Disputed
5 points

What is your support for "the scope of the impact that the drilling question carries"? There is plenty of support for both sides of the issue. And you suggest that 70% of Alaskans are selfish about the oil, though it is also possible that these 70% are more informed than the average American on the issue.

One rarely publicized fact is that only the "1002 section" of ANWR is being considered for drilling. This section has been deemed suitable for designation as wilderness, meaning that, due to the lack of wildlife in the area, drilling would not have an effect on the wildlife.

Supporting Evidence: A Pro-drilling argument. (www.heritage.org)
Side: Section 1002
5 points

Since his first full term that ended in 1972, Stevens has never received less than 66% of the vote. Despite the charges against him (which have yet to be proven), it is obvious that his constituency has approved of the job that he has done, and Stevens must have their best interests in mind. Alternately, Begich is a newcomer that is possibly catering to Alaskans' interests for solely political reasons. He lost elections in 1994 and 2000, and narrowly won without the majority vote in 2003, showing the strong possibility that his initial, authentic views had to be changed to get elected.

Supporting Evidence: Polls and Stevens (www.politico.com)
Side:
Ted Stevens (R)
BarrettBrown(32) Disputed
5 points

It is strange that one would try to make the case for Stevens based on the opinion of Alaskan voters; the most recent round of polls show that the same Alaskans who have given him the benefit of the doubt in the past no longer approve of their veteran senator. Stevens is behind by eight points in a Rasmussen poll released a few days ago, and his recent indictment will probably not allow for much of a comeback.

Side: Clean Politics
5 points

After 9/11, new restrictions were placed on international travel to the United States. This led to less foreign visitors to America, drastically impacting the tourism industry. Ted Stevens co-sponsored bi-partisan legislation establishing a non-profit marketing campaign to boost the image of America as a vacation destination for people from other countries.

Supporting Evidence: Tourism Bill (64.233.169.104)
Side: Tourism
5 points

Ted Stevens has always been quite fair when weighing environmental and economic concerns. Alaska is a battleground for that issue -- a land of pristine wilderness also ripe with natural resources. Stevens understands the importance of growing Alaska's economy but has always been mindful of environmental issues. In this instance, he argued against a proposed gold mine which would impact the salmon community in a region of the state.

Supporting Evidence: Fishing vs. Gold Mine (dwb.adn.com)
Side: Economy and Environment
IgorDerysh(35) Disputed
5 points

Alaska is also a huge labor state. Another huge different in platform is Begich's strong support of the AFL-CIO and labor unions and Ted Stevens' opposition to them. Stevens receives very low approval ratings on Project Vote Smart from the AFL-CIO and other labor organizations while one of Begich's key issues is stronger labor unions within the state.

One of the key things that Begich promises to do that Stevens has not during his everlasting tenure is to bring Alaska into the national and global economic scheme rather than be isolated in that little box on the bottom of a U.S. map.

Here is Begich speaking to the AFL-CIO:

Begich's Message to the AFL-CIO
Side: Labor
5 points

Ted Stevens supports stem cell research, breaking with President Bush on this issue.

Supporting Evidence: Stem Cell Research (www.truveo.com)
Side: Stem Cell Research
chudon(26) Disputed
5 points

The courage to break from the current administration on limited decisive issues is not a platform but rather one of the most basic tenets required of any politician in a democracy. Senator Stevens has remained a fixture in the Senate due to his previous record of widespread popularity in Alaska which stems chiefly from his ability to procure federal funds. Now that his indictment has taken center stage even if he is acquitted he may find himself unable to effectively complete the task Alaskans previously respected him so dearly for.

Supporting Evidence: Indictment affects Alaksan Politics (www.usnews.com)
Side: Stem Cell Research
5 points

This is true, it is refreshing when a candidate is willing to vote their conscience instead of toeing the partyline. It appears that both candidates Senator Stevens and Begich have been known to think independently at times. This bodes well for Alaskans. It could that Alaskan frontier/wildereness/survival mentality emerging.

Side: Stem Cell Research
5 points

Ted Stevens nearly had the clout to have the so-called "Bridges to Nowhere" funded in a transportation bill in 2005. The bridges would have connected rural Alaskan areas with bigger areas, allowing for development and expansion. Critics accused the construction of the bridge as "pork barell" projects which was unneeded and a waste of money. However, this shows Stevens' influence in bringing federal money for Alaskan projects. The project was eventually cancelled in the face of national outrage about the project. Stevens' near success at pulling off this legislation, in the face of animosity, shows his abilities to lobby for his state.

Supporting Evidence: Bridges to Nowhere (www.washingtonpost.com)
Side: Bridges To Nowhere
chudon(26) Disputed
5 points

It is arguable that the very same tactics employed by Stevens to gain federal funding, frequently addressed as "Pork Barreling", during his long tenure in the Senate have contributed to the public controversy over his indictment. It is reasonable to assert that Alaskans do not wish any longer to be associated with needless and shady spending. The same bill mentioned in the previous post would have allocated $453 million to two bridges intended for rural development as part of an ear-mark to the 2005 bill. However, this means of eliciting funds has produced such distaste in the senate that it has made as many enemies as friends. That money may have otherwise been allocated to to the Interstate 10 bridge across Lake Pontchartrain, a major thoroughfare that was severely damaged during Hurricane Katrina. Alaskans certainly do want federal funding but to what end?

Supporting Evidence: federal money (www.washingtonpost.com)
Side: Federal Money
IgorDerysh(35) Disputed
5 points

The Bridges to Nowhere fiasco is what brought earmarks and pork barrel spending into the lime light, but it was bound to happen when one attaches as many earmarks as Stevens has throughout his career. Considered by some to be the King of Pork Barrel spending, the Washington Post Reports that between 2004 and 2008 Stevens secured or played a major role in nearly 900 earmarks worth over $3.2 billion.

Stevens frequently bullied the Senatorial system in order to bring in astronomical sums of federal taxpayer dollars to pet projects in his home state.

Supporting Evidence: Stevens: King of the Earmark (blog.washingtonpost.com)
Side: Federal Money
5 points

Begich has little chance of raising anything near what Senator Stevens has, which was over a Million in the last few months alone. With that much money rolling in, one wonders who exactly makes these donations. And if Mark Begich can't bring home the bacon like Senator Stevens did, could he get elected? Already he has spent most of his own money to fund much of his campaign. But now with the Senator Stevens up to his neck in indictments, some of his own money may go towards his defense.

Unless those same generous donors will come to his rescue now? That remains to be seen.

Supporting Evidence: campaign funding (64.233.167.104)
Side: Campaign Contributions
5 points

You should vote for Senator Ted Stevens. Why?

The proof is in the details of the case. There are a number of important facts to consider before passing final judgment on an icon of the Senate, who has often championed issues on both sides of the aisle. Can't we give the man who single-handedly ushered Title IX through the US Senate some benefit of the doubt? Do you know and understand Title IX? Title IX leveled the playing field between men and women athletic teams at the university and high school level - this was not a popular stance with his Republican colleagues. So please take a collective breath and consider the facts before passing final judgment.

First, a criminal making deals to stay out of prison is often not a credible source. Mr. Allen of VECO fame is just that - a convicted criminal trying to do whatever he can to lessen his jail sentence.

Second, the justice department indicted Senator Stevens for not reporting gifts under the US Senate ethics rules. They did not indict him on bribery or corruption charges because they knew they could not prove a quid pro quo. What does this mean? It means they cannot prove Senator Stevens ever did anything for VECO in return for political favors.

Third, relating to the lack of reporting of gifts, Senator Stevens submitted paid bills in the amount of $130,000 to VECO and he maintains these were the only bills he ever received. It is possible that he believed that was more than enough to cover the renovations of his vacation property. Given the scope of the renovations, one can argue that Senator Stevens is out of touch with the reality of construction costs. This is a far cry and a legal mile from knowingly and willingly taking gifts and purposely avoiding reporting them on his Senate ethics reports.

His political opponets will continue to report that this is a case without a defense and they are wrong. Here is the prediction of the year: Senator Stevens will win re-election relatively easily after the citizens of Alaska are allowed to objectively sort through the lies and the truth. My guess is Senator Stevens is out of touch with the realities of cost but he is not a criminal. I look forward to the year 2009 when Senator Stevens returns to the Senate floor wearing his Incredible Hulk tie and he once again takes on his own party and supports a worthy cause like Title IX.

Where is the cry about Senator Obama's sweetheart land deal in Illinois? Did he report that deal on his Senate ethics report? The answer: No!

Side: Mark Begich
5 points

Compare the facts between Senator Obama and Senator Stevens. Why the indictment against Stevens while Obama gets a free pass? Could it be that unfashionable "R" behind Senator Stevens' name?

Obama Says He Regrets Land Deal With Fundraiser

Senator Bought a Parcel From His Neighbor, a Now-Indicted Political Operative

By Peter Slevin

Washington Post Staff Writer

Sunday, December 17, 2006; Page A06

CHICAGO. Dec. 16 -- Antoin "Tony" Rezko is a political insider, an energetic Chicago dealmaker and campaign fundraiser often in the headlines for being on the wrong side of good government. Indicted in October on influence-peddling charges, he also has a habit of befriending prospective political stars.

One of them was Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), who was offered a job by Rezko in the early 1990s while a top student at Harvard Law School. Obama did not take it, but over the years, the two men stayed in touch, and Rezko backed Obama's successful 2004 U.S. Senate campaign, raising money and contributing his own.

After Antoin "Tony" Rezko, right, leaves the Chicago federal building with his attorney in October after pleading not guilty to influence-peddling. (By Nam Y. Huh -- Associated Press)

Who's Blogging?

Read what bloggers are saying about this article.

The Truth About Obama

Mikey Likes It!

The Brutality of Reason

Full List of Blogs (68 links) »

Most Blogged About Articles

On washingtonpost.com | On the web

Save & Share Article What's This?

DiggGoogle

del.icio.usYahoo!

RedditFacebook

In June 2005, in what Obama now describes as a "boneheaded" mistake, Obama and Rezko's wife bought adjacent properties on Chicago's South Side, closing the deals on the same day. Seven months later, wanting a bigger yard for his $1.65 million house, Obama bought a slice of the Rezko property for $104,500.

After news of the deal broke last month in the Chicago Tribune, Obama said he had erred by creating the appearance that Rezko had done him a favor by selling him a portion of the lot. For the first time since he entered the national spotlight, the 45-year-old freshman senator found himself on the defensive, discussing a personal decision he had come to regret.

"There's no doubt that this was a mistake on my part. 'Boneheaded' would be accurate," Obama said in a telephone interview Friday. "There's no doubt I should have seen some red flags in terms of me purchasing a piece of property from him."

Obama recently donated to charity $11,500 that Rezko had contributed to his federal campaign account.

There have been no allegations that Obama, whose political fortunes are soaring as he mulls a run for president, broke the law or committed any ethics violations. He said he has done no government business with Rezko, who is facing charges in two unrelated criminal cases.

But leaders of Chicago watchdog organizations describe Obama's behavior as a surprising error in judgment, particularly for a politician noted for his tactical skills, his ambition and his support of state and federal ethics legislation.

"It's disappointing because there has been speculation about Tony Rezko, and whether he was crossing ethical lines, for a number of years," said Cynthia Canary, director of the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform.

Jay Stewart, executive director of Chicago's Better Government Association, said, "Being a lawyer, he did everything by the book, but there's a higher expectation of him."

To Chicago political observers, it made sense that Rezko tried to get close to Obama. A Syrian-born businessman whose fortunes seemed to rise and fall with his latest deal, Rezko was known for cultivating politicians, including Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich (D) and Rep. Luis V. Gutierrez (D-Ill.).

Rezko created a real estate development company and operated dozens of Chinese eateries and pizza restaurants. After Blagojevich rode into office in 2002, Rezko emerged as a friend and close adviser. He recommended people for significant state jobs and, a federal grand jury charged, soon tried to shake down investment firms that wanted to do business with Illinois.

Side: Alaska without a voice
chudon(26) Disputed
5 points

The question at hand here is not Senator Barrack Obama and whether or not similar indictments should have been levied against him. Although as a matter of interest the senator was not accused of any wrongdoing himself only of knowing and interacting with someone, "Antoin Rezko", who was, whereas Senator Stevens is in fact being charged with a crime. Also parallels such as the ones you suggest cannot be substantiated with the opinions of bloggers.The bigger and more relevant issue here is how this controversy will affect both Senator Stevens' campaign and the GOP Nationally in the coming months. The senator is missing the kind of outspoken support from his party that would allow him to effectively curtail the media firestorm that has befallen him. Instead many prominent republicans including Republican National Nominee John McCain have taken great lengths to avoid voicing their beliefs in his innocence and have tried to substantially distance themselves from the matter.

Supporting Evidence: GOP support for Stevens not there (www.kansascity.com)
Side: Clean Politics
5 points

Ted Stevens has been underestimated as an institution in the minds of the every day Alaskan. Sometimes referred to as the "Senator for life" he has had a long and well respected career in Alaskan politics (though certainly not everywhere). What must be considered here is the ability of this man to remain beloved by the persons of his state despite current political troubles. The ideal state representative lobbies aggressively for his constituency, and some would argue that though Stevens is excessive he has done his job more effectively than any other previous representative for Alaska. The first new Rasmussen poll has come out since the Senators indictment Tuesday. It would seem to suggest that the Senators legacy as an institution may far outlive his recent political scandal.

Supporting Evidence: Most Recent Rasmussen Poll (www.rasmussenreports.com)
Side: Federal Money
love2write1(45) Disputed
6 points

Although it seems that Alaskans benefitted from his amazing ability to get more pork barreling spending and other perks for Alaska I have to wonder at what cost. Would the people of Alaska still be enamoured with him if they knew his methods were shady and unscrupulous? And the money that went to Alaska would have gone somewhere else if he haadn't snatched it up. The senate should be concerned with the big picture and the country as a whole and not just seeing what they can do for their particular state, possibly in hopes of being re-elected and a "Senator for Life".

And should we even have Senators for life? Maybe it is time to consider term limits again. If a senator worked his entire adult life in government and has no idea what it means to work in the private sector or working class, can he really relate to his constituents? Can a member of the senate who is 84 years do the job of a 40 year old senator, or is he limited by his age?

Two wrongs don't make a right could be said for this situation with Senator Stevens. Ethics, morals and values still count for something.

Side: Federal Money
chudon(26) Disputed
5 points

It is arguable that Sen. Stevens' methods were widely publicized during his lengthy tenure on the Senate floor and that Alaskans found his methods a morally acceptable means of procuring federal funding. Perhaps when considering Alaska geographically it is easy to empathize with the isolation of the state. It has one of the most underdeveloped infrastructures of all the states. As the 49th state to be incorporated into the union it has had to struggle with development comparatively and thus overcompensated presently with Senator Stevens. The length of his tenure represents the ever present thought of development and growth in the minds of Alaska's populous.

Supporting Evidence: The 49th State (xroads.virginia.edu)
Side: Clean Politics
5 points

It appears as though the long time Senator will be provided a chance to clear his name before the coming election. Stevens was granted an early trial date set tentatively for Sept. 24 by U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. Stevens' campaign response to his indictment has been a very thorough concise reaction with such confidence in his innocence that it may have done the impossible...survived a media scandal! With constituents already rallying behind him against the indictment, if he is able to win his trial he may very well have a serious chance at re-election. To be improperly charged, acquitted, and to have come out on top all before the election could prove a diamond in the rough for the Stevens campaign. (But only if he's innocent.)

I'm reposting because my other post is hidden for some reason.

Supporting Evidence: Stevens Gets Early Trial Date Set (www.wtop.com)
Side: Stevens rallies base
love2write1(45) Disputed
6 points

There was no mention of the beloved Senator Stevens today in Alaska's newspaper Anchorage daily news on the front page. Having served 40 years and in court today for possible misconduct, I'm wondering what's missing here? There's a story about mass caribou killings but nothing about Senator Stevens. This strikes me as odd since all the major online news sources have it on their home page. He is almost like the grandfather of the Senate, the longest serving republican. And Alaska is his state. Was this buried, or are the caribou bigger news?

Side: news coverage
5 points

While Steven's sits and pleads not guilty to the charges against him and his deals with Veco, opposition arises from within his own party.

Dave Cuddy, a bank president, real estate developer, and Anchorage native, has announced his bid to take Steven's seat in the U.S. Senate.

"Stevens has served Alaska for 40 years" says Cuddy, "but his time is over." Inevitably, if this phrase reflects the sentiments (or growing sentiments) of a large Alaskan Republican and Independent voting block, Cuddy may be the most viable Republican candidate to actually have a seat on the Senate floor.

Cuddy is presenting himself as "not Stevens" and is running a platform counter to the "big money" economic interests and in support of introducing new and innovative legislation targeted at bolstering the Alaskan economy while at the same time respecting its natural resources and wildlife.

Is Cuddy the new Alaskan Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate?

Supporting Evidence: The New Republican? (www.davecuddy.com)
Side: The New Republican
5 points

At this point, it seems that the Alaska senate race is progressing in favor of Ted Stevens with regards to his standing amongst the faithful Republican voters who have secured his seat in the Senate for the past 40 years.

And, while the legal proceedings continue to cast a growing shadow over Stevens' reputation nationally, it will be interesting to see how the case affects the voter turnout on his behalf.

Stevens has been a staple of Alaskan politics, a figurehead of political pull who has brought much-needed financial contributions and economic growth to the state of Alaska.

I think that, while the pundits hustle to paint the Republican Senator in a negative light to keep ratings as the trial continues, it is important to keep a perspective of Ted Stevens as a man and as a politician who has served the state of Alaska for almost half a century.

Keeping Perspective
Side: Keeping Perspective
5 points

Despite being 84-years-old and facing federal charges and a trial that will occupy him for much of the campaign, Alaskan Republicans voted Ted Stevens as their nominee for Senate once more, this week.

While Stevens did not receive his usual landslide win, receiving just 63 percent of the vote, he will continue on an uphill climb to win his Senate seat for a final time as he goes up against the young and popular Mayor Mark Begich who won his primary with 91 percent of the vote.

Supporting Evidence: Stevens Wins GOP Primary (ap.google.com)
Side: Primary
4 points

No more news stories on Stevens today except hidden in the back pages.

I have a question I desperately need answered. Did Obama disclose his sweetheart land deal with Tony Rezco - yes, the one that he made well over $100,000 in equity almost instantly? If he did, where is the outrage and the indictment against Obama? Oh wait, he is a Democrat so there is no need to pursue it. I get it. If you are a Republican, you get blistered and indicted. If you are a Democrat, you get a pass because you are running a historic campaign and it is "our time." Our time for what? To have a person who is President who acknowledges a boneheaded deal that gave the perception of corruption?

And I guess CreateDebate only hires Democrat bloggers as well. I was being considered for a position writing in the various political column until I opposed a Democrat and favored a Republican in my writing - low and behold since then I can't even get a response as to whether I got the job.

Hmmm...objective sight, eh?

Side:
Ted Stevens (R)
BarrettBrown(32) Disputed
6 points

Well, it probably doesn't help that you are making unfounded accusations against the site simply based on the fact that you haven't heard from its owners for a couple of days. The trial just ended a little over 24 hours ago, you know, so they may very well be still making their decision. The idea that they would only be inclined to hire Democrats or Democratic sympathizers is ridiculous, as the whole point of the site is to provide for debate. Also, you need to work on your grammar and sentence construction if you expect to work as a writer in any capacity.

With regards to the single sentence you include here that is actually on topic, you should be happy that the stories on Stevens have moved off the front page.

Side: news coverage
3 points

I think it's fair to say that the media's frenzy to pick up any and every piece of information they can on Gov. Sarah Palin after McCain announced her as his running mate comes as somewhat of a relief and an energetic push for the dedicated base of the Republican Party of Alaska as the proceedings regarding Sen. Stevens' relationship with Veco Corp. have taken somewhat of a backseat after her acceptance speech on Wednesday night.

Palin's relationship with the Senator may prove beneficial as she carries a good reputation with Alaskan voters. However, there are push polls trying to falsely accuse Palin of endorsing the increasingly unpopular Senator (hoping to sway voters to support Begich [D]) in the Republican primaries. While Palin denies that she has explicitly endorsed Stevens, she has asked for clarity regarding his relationship with Veco and expressed her concerns about how it reflects on the state of Alaska.

From this vantage point, as the trial proceeds and the general election picks up steam, it will be interesting to see how the Alaskan voting responds.

Supporting Evidence: Palin and Stevens (www.politico.com)
Side: Palin and Stevens
3 points

Innocent untill proven guilty. I would rather have someone who made a mistake then a left wing idiot like Begich.

Side: Ted Stevens
3 points

Despite his recent indictment Stevens has "satisfied voters from his party, capturing 63 percent of the vote." Stevens has shown competitive numbers in the polls against Mark Begich as well.

Stevens has a strong voting record missing only 24 votes in this congress. Votes that have shown Stevens to cross the aisle include SCHIP and funding for stem cell research. Stevens’ most obvious challenge is his current case and his membership removal from subcommittees. He is fully supported by his party, and pending this case this is could be one of the most watched 2008 Senate races.

Supporting Evidence: Senate Final Say (www.washingtonpost.com)
Side: Ted Stevens
1 point

This past Friday, Sen. Ted Stevens stopped into Juneau to claim his endorsement from eight Alaskan fishing groups: the Alaska Crab Coalition, Alaska Independent Tenderman's Association, Fishing Vessel Owner's Association, Alaska Seine Owners, Alaska Whitefish Trawlers Association, Western Gulf of Alaska Fisherman, Alaska Scallop Association, and Southeast Alaska Seiners Association.

The endorsement is a refreshing break and much-needed press for the Stevens campaign outside of the trial proceedings in Washington.

Stevens expressed his extreme gratitude for the continued support of the fishing groups and they responded by thanking the 40-year Senator for his voting record on behalf of Alaska's fishing industry; in particular, the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1976, which founded 200-miles of fishing boundaries along the U.S. coastline.

Stevens has also been involved in the Pacific Salmon Treaty that was revised and extended another ten years and addresses escalating expenses hindering the commercial fishing industry.

Stevens graciously accepted the accolades for his prior achievements on behalf of Alaska's fishermen but pointed his vision on the present issues and how to better prepare for the future.

He cited the high cost of fuel as the most pressing issue facing fishermen in Alaska. He proposed an income tax credit for commercial fishermen and pushed for a small loan provision from the U.S. Department of Agriculture to help out Alaska's farming community.

""We're trying in every way we can to find some way to bring down this cost of operation, which is primarily the cost of fuel," the Senator said.

Perhaps his most poignant comment came with regards to the increase of illegal fishing on the Alaskan coast. He promised to meet with the United Nations in the near future to put tight regulations and restrictions against these illegal, unregulated, unreported (IUU) fishing vessels that are hindering Alaska's fishing industry.

"They're not legal anywhere in terms of the fishing activities but they're owned by international investors. They are the largest vessels now in the world. They are larger than the Queen Mary, some of them. They are just amazing vessels and they're out there on the high seas and they're just sandpapering the bottom of the ocean."

Supporting Evidence: Fisherman Endorsement (www.juneauempire.com)
Side: Ted Stevens
1 point

The Alaska Senate race is among six which Republican Senator John Ensign of Nevada characterized as being within the margin of error according to polls for the National Republican Senatorial Committee which is led by the Nevada Senator. The implication is clearly that in a year where Republicans are troubled by the burden of an unpopular outgoing administration, so many "pick 'em" races is "so far, so good" for the Republicans.

Side: Ted Stevens
1 point

The proceedings on the Stevens' financial ties to the Veco Corp. are underway.

The prosecution accused Stevens of using Veco Corp. as his "own personal handyman service" by having them do "hundreds and thousands of dollars worth in work done on his home" (reports the Anchorage Daily News).

Stevens' defense countered the claim by shifting the blame to Veco's chief executive officer, Bill Allen, who, the defense argued, failed to notify the Senator of the exact amount of the remodeling work on his place nor did he show Stevens all the bills for the service.

Brendan Sullivan, Stevens' lawyer, stated, "When you see the evidence ... you'll see he had no intent to violate the law, no intent to conceal anything. He didn't want these things, he didn't ask for these things. He told some of them to take them back. He never once hid anything."

The most interesting development at this point came at the introduction of Stevens' relationship with his second wife, Catherine, who controls the family finances according the defense.

Sullivan relayed a Stevens' quote claiming, "'When it comes to things in and around the teepee, Catherine controls.' That might be a little old-fashioned, but Ted's old-fashioned. The most important thing to know is Catherine ran the financial part (of their household.)"

"She was the person who opened the account, reviewed the bills, she was the person who wrote the check."

However influential this marital dynamic is in determining the outcome of this case, the big testimony that "will be the centerpiece of the trial" according to the article is Bill Allen, the Veco executive, who has yet to be sentenced.

More on the trial as further proceedings unfold.

Supporting Evidence: From the Courtroom (www.adn.com)
Side: From the Courtroom
1 point

Thankfully, this race won't be limited to the two major parties. But excluding everyone else, voting against Stevens is not necessarily a good move regardless of how unpopular he may be for issues that get a lot of attention like his indictment or his support of the revised Wall Street bailout. Begich is endorsed by Wesley Clark who has no congressional experience.

Side:
Ted Stevens (R)
1 point

Stevens Tape Reveals Knowledge of Investigation Before Charges

The drama continues over Stevens's $250,000 worth of gifts from oil company Veco. Stevens's friend and Veco chief executive, Bill Allen agreed with the FBI to record a conversation about legal strategy. The tape offers little to condemn or abdicate Stevens, but it may better inform voters of the investigation and Stevens's behavior under pressure.

In the October 2006 tape, Stevens states,

"The worst that can happen to us is we run up a bunch of legal fees, and might lose and we might have to pay a fine, might have to serve some time in jail. I hope to Christ it never gets to that. . . . I don't think we have done anything wrong."

Supporting Evidence: Listen to the Tape and a Washigton Post Article (www.washingtonpost.com)
Side: Steven's Veco case
1 point

The prosecution rests today in the case against Republican Sen. Ted Stevens' financial dealings with Veco Corp. after three weeks of testimonies from the Veco workers associated with the Senator, the most integral of which was former chief Bill Allen.

Allen's testimony stated that the controversial renovations to Stevens' cabin were made "to make room for visiting grandchildren" (according to the report in the Washington Post.)

He mentioned that the Senator would occasionally request invoices for the project but that he "ignored the requests because he liked him too much and the senator never ended up paying VECO."

The defense is set to present their case after the request to acquit Stevens before the case goes before a jury is heard by U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. The defense has scheduled Sen. Daniel Inouye (D) and former Secretary of State Colin Powell as witnesses.

Supporting Evidence: Prosecution Rests (www.washingtonpost.com)
Side: Prosecution rests