CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:7
Arguments:9
Total Votes:8
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Why I said Nom was buttfucked, by aliens. (7)

Debate Creator

YIsRisenLord(1222) pic



Why I said Nom was buttfucked, by aliens.

Nom, and I I thought it was someone else at the time, said something about me and Borgs that was outrageous, so I returned fire and said he was kidnapped by aliens, and buttfucked for cash. You say outrageous shit about me with a troll account, I return firt. You use your original account to attack attack and block me, I make this fucking post to defend myself. You attacked me first, then I defended myself.
Add New Argument

Nom, and I I thought it was someone else at the time, said something about me and Borgs that was outrageous, so I returned fire and said he was kidnapped by aliens, and buttfucked for cash. You say outrageous shit about me with a troll account, I return firt.

Ahahahahaha!!! Listen, you hilarious lunatic, if you want to "return fire" then that's fine. No problem. The problem arises when you label yourself a Christian, because that is the opposite of what Jesus told Christians to do in those circumstances. What you are fond of doing when you are clearly in the wrong in an argument is something I have noticed the American right does almost constantly: you try to change the argument.

Just to remind you, my argument is -- and always was -- that you are a fake Christian hypocrite who couldn't give a shit about what Jesus wants. All you care about is what you want. Dealing with you is like dealing with a spoilt 12 year old child. I want. My rights. Me, Me, Me.

Amarel(5393) Clarified
1 point

I really would like to explain to you that you're stupid without necessarily hurting your feelings.

You're a mentally disabled child calling people names. It doesn't hurt anyone's feelings. Rather, it's a bit shameful for onlookers how pathetic yet amusing it is.

1 point

Neither could you care about Yeshua or democracy. When you areon my debate lying about me, you will abide by my rules, comrendez vouz, mon cher? You are the one who slandered me first, and no, I do not have to tolerate any slander, ever. You need a nice serving, of Bull Shitoki mushrooms, coming right up. Would you like anything, else, with your order?

0 points

Couldn't you just say this to him in a reply on a debate he doesn't control?

1 point

Hi Amarel. Couldn't seem to reply to your laughable far right propaganda on the other thread. Seems I got banned for linking evidence. Oh well. Lol. 😆

First, he said while alleviating inequality we should avoid leveling down, not your convenient misunderstanding.

There's no misunderstanding. Mounk is pretending he doesn't understand socialism. Indeed, it looks like he's inventing his own economic policy where we just throw all the excess wealth away which is currently being hoarded by the one percent. In socialism you see, what we do is take all that excess wealth and divide it among everybody else, so everyone except the one percent becomes better off and no-one starves.

There. That was easy. As for the rest of your stupid twaddle, I'm afraid I'm not even interested in reading it. That's how contemptibly dishonest, stupid and biased I find you.

Amarel(5393) Disputed
1 point

Misunderstanding socialism? The article was about CDC guidelines that would cause more death in the name of racial equity.

There must have been a shiney object in your room.

And an opinion piece in support of an ad hominem is not evidence.

Amarel(5393) Clarified
1 point

Case in point.

Nom can respond in that debate if he wants, but Quantumhead will have to use one of Burrito's countless other accounts to do so. .