Why do liberals never mention gang violence in gun debates?
because
Side Score: 5
|
 |
too brown to speak against
Side Score: 13
|
|
|
|
|
They do, take the shite out of your ears. The usual liberal opinion on gang violence is that it would be drastically less if those dipshits could not obtain guns so easily. LOL...did that answer work out the way you hoped it would? I know...ouch, right? Cheers, mate. Side: because
3
points
The usual liberal opinion on gang violence is that it would be drastically less if those dipshits could not obtain guns so easily. Gangs usually have stolen and/or illegal guns. When the cops do anything to gangs, liberals call it police brutality, racism & systematic oppression. How do you plan on disarming 33,000 U.S. gangs by the way? Side: too brown to speak against
3
points
|
@Pat, I don't know what part of the world you're from but your name sounds Irish in origin. Guns and explosives were always illegal in Ireland, both North and South but the terrorist gangs were able to bring weapons and explosives in, literally by the shiploads. If anyone thinks that any government, left, right or straight up the middle would risk the inevitable bloody violence of making a crackdown on all firearms they're 'loopy'. Side: too brown to speak against
|
