Why does America need to do what other countries will not?
This
Side Score: 10
|
 |
That
Side Score: 33
|
|
|
|
|
Most European countries led by Germany's ''Mad Merkel'' have accepted 100s of 1000s of so called refugees. Germany alone let in over one million Muslim immigrants during 2016 with countless more 1000s swamping other European nations such as Sweden who are now paying an extremely heavy price for the bleeding hearts within their governments. Today's sad eyed, so called, refugees with their hard luck stories are tomorrow's terrorists, rapists, muggers, acid throwers and rioters. Well done the ''POLITICIANS''. Well done the shit heads who voted them into power. There is no doubt that the generations to come will curse the politicians of today who condemned their nations to the hell of Muslim terrorism, civil unrest and 'UNCONTROLLABLE'' crime for ''as far as the eye can see'. China, Russia Saudi Arabia and Japan are among those nations which are maintaining a high degree of protection for their citizens by exercising a moratorium on the import of Muslims and ensuring that their values and way of life are protected. THE AUSTRALIANS MAKE SURE THESE NOMADIC ALIENS DO NOT INFEST THE MAINLAND NOR CONTAMINATE AUSTRALIAN SOCIETY BY CORRALLING THEM INTO THE ISLANDS OF NAURU AND MANUS. UNDER SOME STRANGE ''EXCHANGE AGREEMENT', THESE MUSLIMS HAVE BEEN ACCEPTED BY THE U.S. AND WILL BE ARRIVING SOON. As the Muslims expand the great tracts of the western towns and cities which they have ''appropriated'' so the way of life of the indigenous populations will retract along with the opportunity to enjoy their freedom for which they sacrificed so much in two horrific world wars. How the shrewd and clever nations of the world must look on in bewilderment, and perhaps in some instances, even glee, at the nations of the west destroying themselves. I repeat myself, 'YOU COULDN'T MAKE IT UP'. Side: This
You're missing the point, a very obvious point which is that people don't really care about what happens as long as it doesn't affect them directly. As long as they don't have loved ones who are blown to pieces or don't suffer personal injury or obvious financial loss they couldn't give a damn. Yes they'll give lip service to the endless stream of atrocities and make all the right noises of feigned sympathy for the victims, but once that mandatory chore is over it's, right, what's for lunch. Side: That
I live in Germany and can tell you that we are not paying an "extremely high price". There has been terrorist attacks but still not enough to refuse to help. We are not so weak. I imagine that the number of people killed by terrorists per year in Germany is probably similar to the number of people killed by toddlers in the US. We have to keep things in perspective. Yes it's scary but let's not be snowflakes about it.. There are FAR more destructive and deadly things in our society than refugees. Side: That
Angela Merkel under more pressure over refugee policy as it is revealed migrants committed 142,500 crimes in Germany during the first six months of 2016 Seems you don't know what is going on in Germany there Arag Side: This
That's strange as every German publication I've read clearly states that violent immigrant crime has reached alarming new hights with an increase of over 50% being recorded in 2016. Why don't you go and spew out your fictitious drivel in cities such as Munchen where rape and other violent crime committed by Muslim immigrants has become part of everyday life. I don't think you live in Germany, nor have even been there, I think you live on the moon and have done so all your life. Side: This
Hello Pancho Villa, You're much too quick to '' shoot the messenger''. I genuinely don't hate anyone, not even filth like you. Because I point out that the dark skinned subspecies of this world have contributed little or nothing to the advancement or welfare of mankind and are responsible for the greater percentage of violent crime in every country or community in which they live doesn't give you the right to call me disgusting names. Our dark skinned brothers with their primitive brains infest western nations because they, and/or their kind, have turned their own countries into poverty stricken disease ridden shitholes. In the main, dark skinned people cannot help it, they are totally unsuited to successfully competing in a white man's world so they become resentful and this resentment turns quickly to violence which erupts into an ever descending spiral of further violence. Why do you blame me for pointing out these indisputable and self evident truths? White flight from the black crime centres of Detroit and now Chicago has ensured that these once proud and prosperous cities will degenerate to closely resemble the shitholes of many middle eastern/ African countries. I mean, how is that my fault? I don't want it to be that way, but that's the way it is. Side: This
Hey FRAUD looks as if Germany is having a problem what do you think ? Angela Merkel under more pressure over refugee policy as it is revealed migrants committed 142,500 crimes in Germany during the first six months of 2016 That not a problem as you see it ? Side: This
"Why should America take refugees when the rest of the world won't": Lets look specifically at Syrian Refugees: Jordan: 628,000 Lebanon: 1,048,275 Iraq: 245,543 Egypt: 119,665 (possibly as high as 500,000) Turkey: 2,688,686 (Sub Total: About 4.7m) Argentina: 3,000 Australia: 3,146 Canada: 40,081 Germany: 300,000 (estimated). Greece: 31,000 Kuwait: 120,000 Norway: 8000 Russia: 5000 Slovenia: 10,000 Sweden: 38,636, USA: about 10,000 It's not the case the US is being asked to do what other countries are not. It's the case, that the world is dealing with literally millions of refugees fleeing the Syrian war, and feeling persecution, violence and death in many other countries. America is being asked. as it's position of being the richest country on the planet, who regularly thumps it's chest about being a beakon of freedom to help out. Side: This
11
points
It's the case, that the world is dealing with literally millions of refugees fleeing the Syrian war Nope. Parts of the West and the Middle East isn't "the world". Notice, many Muslim countries aren't on your list. No Asian countries are on your list. And basically all of Africa and South America is not on your list.The point? 95%+ of the world isn't on your list. It's been left up to a handful of nations to "deal with it". Side: That
|
1
point
Because America isn't run by a nearly oligarchal democracy (Russia), a corrupt "democracy" (China) or a theocracy that partially mimics a democracy (Saudi Arabia). One would assume the "leader of the free world" would be interested in the freedoms of the people of the world. National Security is always something that needs to be balanced, one cannot jeopardise one's own citizens but at the same time refugees are people too and deserve the same rights as any other human. Side: That
4
points
Looks as if Germany is having some problems with refugees there Arag. Better brush up on what is happening in your own country. Side: This
|
