I read what you wrote, it was a very short sentence, and very straight to the point in stating that men are different than women.

Yes, the two genders have differences. This is sexual dimorphism.

I may have made the error of equating the difference to that of greater or less rather than any other possibility but that difference still should not qualify as a reason for exclusion or separation. Everyone has difference but can work through them to be greater than others who seemed advantaged.

Alright, there are two things that have stood out to me in your argument so far. This statement: "Everyone has difference but can work through them to be greater than others who seemed advantaged" and "stating that men are different than women." It appears to me that you believe that I am stating that one gender is superior than the other. When I simply said that the two genders had differences you almost immediately assumed that I was saying that one gender is better than the other. In order for you to understand my argument you'll have to throw this notion aside.

For instance, when I stated that "Men and women learn differently for the most part as well, it might actually work best if some courses were co-ed and others were gender specific." you immediately assumed that I was saying one gender had superior mental power than the other. I can't really say this is your fault, I would argue that it is simply Modern Western views on gender that have trained you to assume that sexism was what I was pushing. On the topic of schooling I feel that the people from NASSPE say it better than I do. source