CreateDebate


Debate Info

18
14
Do not cage animals Cage animals >:(
Debate Score:32
Arguments:20
Total Votes:46
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Do not cage animals (9)
 
 Cage animals >:( (10)

Debate Creator

123abc(3) pic



Would you cage an animal for food which is abusing them?

More people should uncage animals

Do not cage animals

Side Score: 18
VS.

Cage animals >:(

Side Score: 14
2 points

Stop caging animals and choose this side so we can save the animals from their misery

Side: Do not cage animals
Saintnow(3684) Clarified
1 point

Who is going to end your misery ?

Side: Do not cage animals
2 points

Caging animals have their downsides like having stress or bad produce.

Side: Do not cage animals
2 points

Animals should be allowed to live out their lives in their natural habitat and be protected when necessary.

People try to rationalise their cruelty of caging animals by arguing that it is the only way to ensure the survival of some of the more endangered species.

This of course is nonsense as those animals on the endangered species list could be protected on properly managed reservations.

Caged animals suffer extreme stress which manifests itself by them relentlessly and aimlessly pacing up and down.

Animals were born free and should be allowed to remain free.

Side: Do not cage animals
Negligentt(397) Disputed Banned
1 point

How do you protect animals with no fences or cages? Voodoo?

Side: Cage animals >:(
Antrim(1287) Disputed
2 points

Animals, such as elephants and tigers are already being protected by ''ranger patrols' in designated nature reserves throughout Africa and have been for decades.

Of course some poachers will get through the security net, but in the main many species of animals which were facing extinction are making a comeback as a result of organised protection programmes.

I didn't realise that there were moonbeams such as you in existence who are totally ignorant of what is going on in the world in which they live.

Were you always a thick shithead?

Does stupidity run in your shithead family?

Have you been living on the moon for the past 40 to 60 years you broken down brainless shithead?

It's dumb filth such as you who needs to be chained and locked up in a confined cage and not released until they can pass a basic general knowledge test on the world around them.

In the meantime your utter stupidity makes you a danger to the public and to yourself.

Side: Do not cage animals
1 point

Hello dc:

Animals who live a GOOD life taste much better than animals who've lead a stressful life.. Turns out Adrenalin in the meat makes it taste shitty..

excon

Side: Do not cage animals
Negligentt(397) Disputed Banned
1 point

Me needs a link to prove dat that be true MJ leaf. Gets on the move, scurry off, and go fetch us da link.

Side: Cage animals >:(

I think it needs to be cleared that fencing is way different from caging..

there are organisations which know their role well in preserving and protecting the endangered species. When we talk about caging animals for our food, I feel it is abuse.. but there is a counter argument too.., if we do not harm the species as a whole, not making it endangered, then i feel it would be okay to cultivate them.. however, we do find that men still continue to consume some endangered species, which is wrong.

http://webecoist.momtastic.com/2009/04/09/12-endangered-animals-that-people-still- eat/

Side: Do not cage animals

People usually forget the classifications; wild animals and domestic animals.

When i see an idiot being eaten up by a cage broken free lion in his home, i will call the police when the animal is almost done eating so that neighbours don't also suffer his stupidity.

And infact, if not greed for money, why would one capture an animal for pet or zoo purposes.

Keeping a lion or any animal caged sickens them. No living thing is to be caged(except for psychological problems problems). But men want to be wiser than God the designer, trying to bring animals meant for the forest home.

Many generation have come to pass where lions and others have been in the forest without man's involvement and they have also survived fine just like the race of man.

No lion will beg to stay in a five star hotel, it will rather kill it quickly.

Rich people buy animals and inject them some meds to tame them, and use them as luxirious accesories just like old times human slavery.

That is an animal abuse.

But the domestic ones kept at home should have enough space to move about freely mostly in the day until bed time.

Side: Do not cage animals
Negligentt(397) Disputed Banned
1 point

Da snake be in a cage. Can we put da snake in da cage or let it loose on da kids??

Side: Cage animals >:(
jeffreyone(1383) Clarified
2 points

Ummm! You're confused? Admit it and let me help you.

Or i have no idea what you're talkng about.

Side: Do not cage animals

It depends on the animal. Are we seriously expected to let a predatory creature free with no fences or bars? Lions would mame us and rip out our inner organs, then eat us alive. Non cage supporters are sick.

Side: Cage animals >:(
1 point

How is it considered abuse if you're going to eat it anyway?

Side: Cage animals >:(
Atrag(5666) Banned
1 point

Food should never

abuse animals.

Side: Cage animals >:(
1 point

Dang, you beat me to that one. .............................................................

Side: Cage animals >:(